Kissinger Calls For Attack On Iran If Revolution Fails, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 13 times


reply posted on 24-6-2009 @ 12:06 PM by john124
edit: sorry wrong thread

[edit on 24-6-2009 by john124]


reply posted on 24-6-2009 @ 12:25 PM by john124
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
Originally posted by john124


Thank you john.



no problem.

Twitter messages talk of brutality much worse and bodies beaten bloody unconscious or dead being dragged away to warehouses. This is turning into a catastrophe of a huge magnitude. The woman in the video is right, at some point the west will have to do something. If Russia veto a resolution at the UN tell them to go to hell.

Something tells me America would have been better if John Mccain was president. It's not like I don't like Obama, I just don't think he fully understands this Islamic regime yet.

IMO the deaths could be over a thousand already, maybe more.


reply posted on 24-6-2009 @ 06:29 PM by Gorman91
reply to post by Sundancer


As I've said elsewhere, why would the CIA fund the collapse of the Iranian regime? If a democratic Iran wins and the current power removed, this would mean the middle east would have a friendly Iraq, Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and India. There would no longer be justification for being there! Hezbollah and Hamas would collapse from no funding, Syria would give up trying to do anything, Israel would be unquestioned in its occupation o Palestine, and Iran would have no interest in bullying Israel.

Not only that, but this would tip the power balance as well. The fleeing of all those who stand against a united free middle east will cause China and Russia to be more involved. Those that oppose us only have China and Russia to run to anymore if Iran falls.

Why would the US risk more drama with China AND Russia whilst trying to maintain a presence in the middle east?

Where will this money come from? how do you plan on being on the defensive in a new cold war where Russia and China stand at odds to you and each other.

What you'd have is a 3 way split sphere of influence. And when 3 superpowers begin building spheres on influence in the same area.... well... just look at history.

The US cannot defend the entire middle east against Chinese and Russian influences, while at the same time remaining defensive-aggressive to North Korea, while at the same time funding the formation and securing of the African Union and it's health interests, all while at the same time keeping it's people calm and not revolting.

By all means pal, tell me your strategy on how to do this.

If you still think the CIA did it, than you really have no strategy education. Even basic video games for 10 year olds tell you this basic lesson.

[edit on 24-6-2009 by Gorman91]

[edit on 24-6-2009 by Gorman91]

[edit on 24-6-2009 by Gorman91]


reply posted on 24-6-2009 @ 06:39 PM by SpaceMonkeys
reply to post by Gorman91


Your missing the crucial fact that "they" want a world war, they've been gearing up for this for a while.


reply posted on 24-6-2009 @ 06:55 PM by Here Now
reply to post by bobbylove321


He reminds me of that Goon leader from south africa from "Lethal Weapon 2"..

I think it was 2.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^