Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Domestic livestock breed in numbers that sustain their kind despite being food animals for humans. Dolphins and whales, however, do not, and cannot keep their populations stable when humans are slaughtering them on this sort of scale.
The amount of pilot whales they harvest do not seem to effect their numbers much, it at all, does this make it acceptable to you? It's not like they are taking more than they need for survival. They are not endangered and the kills are relatively small, unlike other commercial kills by other nations that would wipe out 50,000+ in one season in the past. The number of pilot whales in the North Atlantic seems to be between 250,000+ on the low side to 440,000 - 1.3M on the high side. We aren't talking an endangered species here, pilot whales are one of the most numerous whales in the world and the numbers they kill are relatively small.
I take it your point is mankind shouldn't be eating any wild animals, but us subjecting livestock to truly horrendous lifetimes is somehow ok? I don't get how you can get those two thoughts to coexist in your moral compass at the same time. For me they are both sources of food to be properly harvested, managed and maintained. It would be different if they were endangered or not used for food, but that is not the case. I don't particularly like that most domestic livestock lead such horrible lives, but it's a trade off I am willing to live with to have steak and chicken on my grill.
You whole point of Domestic livestock sustaining their numbers is a joke. Mankind would eat through all the cattle and pigs in the world if we didn't not artificially maintain those numbers.


Where is PETA now huh? Oh wait they are too worried about a damn fly in the White House mean time these
poor things are being slaughtered for no apparent reason! 