I think
theoretically there is some basic merit to the Russian plasma stealth technology but to think that it is better, more effective, on par
or anywhere close to stealth via design shape management is sheer fantasy at the current state of development.
Someone may have already linked to this information, but I understand the Russians are selling India on the idea of plasma stealth and claiming that
in trials with Indian witnesses a Mig outfitted with plasma stealth had a 10 fold reduction in RCS. (I'm trying to find link...
I really should
bookmark this stuff when I find it)
Many Russian aerospace fans adamantly claim that the incident where Russian fighters overflew the USS Kitty Hawk in October 2000 was proof that the
Russians plasma stealth works and works well.
LINK
But there has been no public claim from Russia that stealth had anything to do with this incident.
Also there is certainly valid science behind plasma and it's contribution to reducing RCS - it is no secret that plasma can reduce the reflectivity
of microwaves as well as act as a shield or even be used essentially as a mirror for electromagnetic radiation as well as laser depending on
frequency.
LINK
The problem with this is as one other post indicated,
heat, light and the ability to track the energy footprint. An alternative could of course
be Cold plasma.
Many publications credit Russian scientist Anatoly Klimov on discovering that plasma reduces the RCS of an aerial vehicle in the late 1970's -
However, it seems this phenomenon was first researched back in 1968 by US aircraft manufacturer Northrop, evidenced by a paper Northrop presented to
the AIAA entitled "ElectroAerodynamics in Supersonic Flow".
This paper was alledged to have been pulled shortly after being published due to the radar cross section reducing information present in it.
(Aerospaceweb may have more info on this or may be able to confirm or debunk that this indeed happened).
However, there are other papers available on the internet now that cover this subject and seem to outline what the original Northrop paper said.
LINK
Since even before that 1968 paper came out, US aerospace companies had researched this extensively - and you can bet every so often they have
revisited this technology to check it's viability with the current state of science.
Are the Russians onto something? Sure...there is great potential in what they are working on but it is not on par or a leap beyond the current state
of stealth in the US. IMHO.
[Edited on 6-5-2004 by intelgurl]