Buzz Aldrin: "Let's aim for Mars"

*FIRST OF ALL BUZZ ALDRIN WILL BE THE GUEST ON CNN AMERICAN MORNING TOMORROW (WEDNESDAY JUNE 24) FROM 6-9AM*

Buzz Aldrin: "Let's aim for Mars"

www.cnn.com...

•Buzz Aldrin: Our mission to the moon was shared by the world as an adventure
•He says he became depressed after the mission was over
•Aldrin says he took on a new mission: to open space to the average person
•He says a mission to colonize Mars would restore adventure of space travel

[edit on 23-6-2009 by ufo reality]

Also news worthy:
www.cnn.com...
www.foxnews.com...



[edit on 23-6-2009 by ufo reality]

New Buzz fro an old favorite.
Sure were going to Mars, when pigs fly.
This sounds like Kennedy and his Moon speech that ended
up being accomplished under Nixon.
Accomplished under Nixon, no wonder people doubt the Moon Landing.
Much less the the Moon orbit and the Moon liftoff back to Moon orbit
and final re-entry.
Mathematically too complex as orbit requires exact mass, size and
altitude and velocity determination or the astronaut is lost for an
undetermined amount of time.
Hail the great Nixon Moon Landing, no wonder people think Bush did zilch.

www.foxnews.com...

&

Wednesday June 24:
Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz Aldrin encourages the U.S. to aim for Mars. Watch the interview tomorrow on CNN’s American Morning.

Too bad opposing views can't be aired.
I'd like to see programs like that.
I hope all the space cadets the best but if we go through
more conspiracies I hope one of these Buzz cadets going
to Mars tells us what he did all that time.
These slight of hand magic shows are getting into real life
playtime and hope a mk ultra camp is not the next stop
for the Mars playbook.

reply to post by ufo reality


I think the real reason is that NASA forbade him (even possibly threatened his family etc) from disclosing the space critters and UFO's he saw. That would depress anyone. Imagine growing up and being fed lies and discovering the truth but not being able to share it with the world.

I'd go nuts too.

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
Accomplished under Nixon, no wonder people doubt the Moon Landing.

Nixon was in office for exactly 7 months prior to the Moon landing...I think the 9 years of work and billions of dollars spent before he became president were the reasons we went to the Moon.

Much less the the Moon orbit and the Moon liftoff back to Moon orbit
and final re-entry.
Mathematically too complex as orbit requires exact mass, size and
altitude and velocity determination or the astronaut is lost for an
undetermined amount of time.

That's why they do engine burns to correct the spacecraft's path along the way.

It's true that it would be practically impossible to launch a rocket into lunar orbit using only the original direction the rocket was going when it lifted off -- but that's not what they do. They check their position/direction, see how far they are "off", do some simple math, then make an engine burn to get them back on course...then after a while they do it all again.


[edit on 6/24/2009 by Soylent Green Is People]

reply to post by Soylent Green Is People


Does the Lander takeoff, into orbit and then orbit shift to
the Control Module.

Flying up to catch the orbiting Control Module seems difficult
without aligning into the same orbit.

Unless the Control Module was angled to the approach of the
Lander.

However the Space Shuttle does this maneuver quite well.

ED: Nixon was still in control and got Johnson the Space Center
as part of the space scam or whoever the Nixon backers were
at the party before JFK was assassinated. Well the Illuminati
bakers were probably not at the Johnson party. Too close for
comfort.

[edit on 6/24/2009 by TeslaandLyne]

reply to post by TeslaandLyne

Well, it took off in the direction of the command module (i.e., along the best trajectory based on their calculations), but once it got close to the command module the LEM used its reaction thrusters to correct for the inevitable slight differences between the actual path and calculated path.