Would our military personnel honor the Constitution or just follow orders?, page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 23-6-2009 @ 07:37 PM by Hastobemoretolife
reply to post by dooper



True true, I do know one thing, it wouldn't be hard to send the blue helmets into a frenzy.

I wonder what they would do when several 30.06 are whizzing by there heads, in multiple areas at a time. What are they going to do abandon their posts to go help out their buddies?

Not really marital law if there are no People to enforce it.


reply posted on 23-6-2009 @ 07:43 PM by visible_villain
reply to post by CBS01


You asked :
Would our military personnel honor the Constitution or just follow orders?

History holds the answer ...



Source : Wikipedia

Those troops who have 'ethical, moral, or legal' issues with their orders will simply be eliminated -



Source : Ivan's War By Catherine Merridale, p. 69



reply posted on 23-6-2009 @ 07:53 PM by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by visible_villain



Are you seriously comparing our troops to those of the Red Army under Stalin??? I am seriously dumbfounded!!! Talk about apples and oranges!!! I am tempted to just go off on you, but I'll keep to my ATS personal mantra, and attack the post and not the poster!


reply posted on 23-6-2009 @ 07:55 PM by dooper
reply to post by Hastobemoretolife



They couldn't paint enough blue helmets fast enough to replace those with bullet holes.

Not that I have anything personal against UN troops, but they have no business on US territory. Foreign troops on American soil, regardless of good intent - they're fair game.

I can't think of anything that would rile up the population like such a stupid move such as that. In fact, they'd have to relocate the UN. I know a few boys from that neck of the woods, and while they'll fight each other over the slightest difference, they'd make short work of foreign intruders.

That is why I think the NWO folks are dreaming. Delusional.

Many in history were delusional. Many thought they'd run things the way they wanted, and made grand, detailed plans to do so.

The problem is, many stiff-necked people just don't want to cooperate.

A foreign military presence?

They may as well shoot themselves.


reply posted on 23-6-2009 @ 07:59 PM by dooper
reply to post by visible_villain



Vusible, your analogy leave out one very critical element. Actually, two.

First, the Russians of the day were accustomed to being "ruled." One ruler for another made little difference in their daily lives, and was more easily pushed upon them.

The people had no history of self-determination. No experience. No longing.

Second, the people were unarmed. A few White Russians fought for a while, but they were too few.

Americans KNOW what freedom is like, they are unaccustomed to being "ruled," and they are well-armed.

Look at what's going on in Iran. Now imagine an armed Iran. . .


reply posted on 23-6-2009 @ 08:07 PM by Hastobemoretolife
reply to post by dooper



I agree, I'm from the south I know how it is, brothers will beat each other bloody try to break up the fight they will turn on you beat you down then go back to fighting each other.

Same here I don't have anything against the UN either, but there is no reason for them to be in uniform on American soil.

Also I feel the same way as you. I think TPTB are delusional, way out of touch with reality. Kind of reminds me of the Romans(or was it the greeks?) where one senator wanted the slaves to where arm bands so they could identify who were and were not slaves and the other senator objected because they would know how many of them are and there would be an uprising.


reply posted on 23-6-2009 @ 08:15 PM by one4all
My thoughts are like this,if you took every soldier on earth and added up the number of people you have you then have the number of humans it would take to completely change the course of human history.

Lets say there are thirty million soldiers worldwide in active duty as we speak,if you could find a way to get ALL OF THEM TO OPERATE AS ONE GROUP YOU WOULD HAVE AN INSTANT NEW WORLD ORDER,A GLOBAL DEMOCRACY,IN THE TRUEST STATE THAT DEMOCRACY CAN POSSIBLY EXIST IN ON OUR PLANET.

Instantly.

Would the military forces of the world follow orders and shoot on command?

They are doing a job that they are screened for suitability and then chosen to do and that they also personally choose to do,this is a deadly combonation so unless THEY DID NOT TRULY BELIEVED IN THE CAUSE THEY WERE ORDERD TO SHOOT YOU FOR,I wouldnt roll those dice,not even once.

Personally I would not shoot my family based on any principal.No one would.

But thats why military operate in squads and have a chain of command that happens to have the ultimate punitive tool--YOU GET SHOT IF YOU DONT SHOOT AND YOUR LEADER OR YOUR RIGHTHAND MAN WILL PULL THE TRIGGER FULLY BELIEVING THAT YOU ARE SUFFERING A MOMENT OF WEAKNESS AND THEY ARE ACTUALLY HELPING YOU FULFILL YOUR OBLIGATION TO THEM AND THE MILITARY BY CAPPING YOUR BUTT.

So I am afraid that there is a lot more involved in the actions we are talking about than a single personal moral decision,you simply dont have the time to debate the issue when there is a gun barrell pointed at your forehead.


Many would shoot on orders and many will not.

If you are talking domestic control you are in a MEXICAN STANDOFF.

If you are talking national interest conflict with moral questionmarks,EVERYONE IS UNLOADING IN WHATEVER DIRECTION THEIR COMMANDER POINTS,PERIOD.



reply posted on 23-6-2009 @ 09:41 PM by visible_villain
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
reply to
post by visible_villain



Are you seriously comparing our troops to those of the Red Army under Stalin??? I am seriously dumbfounded!!! Talk about apples and oranges!!! I am tempted to just go off on you, but I'll keep to my ATS personal mantra, and attack the post and not the poster!


Not at all ..

And I know my point is terrifying -- yet there it is ...

Obviously what's now going on in the US is identical to what went on in the Soviet Union in the 1930's as Stalin 'consolidated power', and what went on in Germany toward the same end during that same period as well ...

And I don't think you're dumb or dumbfounded -- just too terrified to think clearly.

This is exacly where they want us, my friend ...


reply posted on 23-6-2009 @ 09:47 PM by visible_villain
Originally posted by dooper
reply to
post by visible_villain



Vusible, your analogy leave out one very critical element. Actually, two.

First, the Russians of the day were accustomed to being "ruled." One ruler for another made little difference in their daily lives, and was more easily pushed upon them.

The people had no history of self-determination. No experience. No longing.

Second, the people were unarmed. A few White Russians fought for a while, but they were too few.

Americans KNOW what freedom is like, they are unaccustomed to being "ruled," and they are well-armed.

Look at what's going on in Iran. Now imagine an armed Iran. . .

Look --

This is all well and good ... and very poetic and patriotic as well ... whatever ...

I don't care how many 'well armed citizens' you put in theatre, all I need is one unmanned drone and 'somethin extry special from the boys in the lab' ...

Capice ?

Anyway, for a bunch of people who claim they 'deny ignorance' , it's clear you all have no idea what on its way to your doorstep ...

Take care, and good luck.


reply posted on 23-6-2009 @ 10:06 PM by Jakes51
Originally posted by visible_villain
Originally posted by dooper
reply to
post by visible_villain



Vusible, your analogy leave out one very critical element. Actually, two.

First, the Russians of the day were accustomed to being "ruled." One ruler for another made little difference in their daily lives, and was more easily pushed upon them.

The people had no history of self-determination. No experience. No longing.

Second, the people were unarmed. A few White Russians fought for a while, but they were too few.

Americans KNOW what freedom is like, they are unaccustomed to being "ruled," and they are well-armed.

Look at what's going on in Iran. Now imagine an armed Iran. . .

Look --

This is all well and good ... and very poetic and patriotic as well ... whatever ...

I don't care how many 'well armed citizens' you put in theatre, all I need is one unmanned drone and 'somethin extry special from the boys in the lab' ...

Capice ?

Anyway, for a bunch of people who claim they 'deny ignorance' , it's clear you all have no idea what on its way to your doorstep ...

Take care, and good luck.


You are probably correct with the drone analogy and large amounts of insurgents could be neutralized. However, that is where our armed forces need to and walk away from their consoles and refuse to take the orders. You mentioned purges of the past, Stalin's purge of the military and Hitler's Night of the Long Knives; and it is safe to say that it could happen here as well. All we can do is hope that the armed forces don't blindly follow unjust and immoral orders. Hopefully, most of them are educated enough to discern right from wrong and have the cajones to make the right choices under pressure.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Give Obama a Break! He Isn\'t All That Bad.
  Posted 4 days ago with 32 member flags
Congress Is Fired
  Posted 13 days ago with 8 member flags
Why are Americans so scared of different Politcal Ideology
  Posted 7 days ago with 8 member flags
Mitt or Barack? - Give me a break!
  Posted 4 days ago with 3 member flags
What Happens When Taxpayers Strike?
  Posted 14 days ago with 2 member flags