Originally posted by grapesofraft
reply to post by James Random

---

I dont really think the Bilderbergs are about control. If they were it could have easily been accomplished in certain times in the last 100 years.

Originally posted by grapesofraft
reply to post by James Random

---

Ok now this is getting a litte off track. It is hard to believe that some of the smartest, richest people in the world are a bunch of superstitious people who have time to run around worrying about numerology. That is the beliefs of a bunch of fools and these men are not fools nor do they run around dressed half naked in goats costumes performing homo erotic rituals in the middle of formulating plans to rule the world.

[edit on 22-6-2009 by grapesofraft]

Originally posted by grapesofraft
reply to post by James Random

---

Well I am sure somewhere down the line my ancestors believed that if you walk under a ladder you get bad luck or if you step on a crack you break your mamas back. But then luckily someone along the line got smart enough or educated enough to realize that was retarded and stopped believing it.

Originally posted by grapesofraft
reply to post by prevenge

---

How exactly does a person go about making money fighting imaginary aliens?

Originally posted by Bachfin
reply to post by grapesofraft

---

Yeah mate the NWO isn't real.. just keep telling yourself that as they herd you into the gathering center for you RFID chip and cancer injections..

I bet the Bilderboogers could answer that for ya more clearly, but I bet all they'd have to do is declare war on 'em to start making money, and without one shot being fired.

There's a new bill working its way through Congress that is cause for some alarm: the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 (PDF summary here), introduced by Senators Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) and Olympia Snowe (R-ME). The bill as it exists now risks giving the federal government unprecedented power over the Internet without necessarily improving security in the ways that matter most. It should be opposed or radically amended.

Essentially, the Act would federalize critical infrastructure security. Since many of our critical infrastructure systems (banks, telecommunications, energy) are in the hands of the private sector, the bill would create a major shift of power away from users and companies to the federal government. This is a potentially dangerous approach that favors the dramatic over the sober response.

One proposed provision gives the President unfettered authority to shut down Internet traffic in an emergency and disconnect critical infrastructure systems on national security grounds goes too far. Certainly there are times when a network owner must block harmful traffic, but the bill gives no guidance on when or how the President could responsibly pull the kill switch on privately-owned and operated networks.

Furthermore, the bill contains a particularly dangerous provision that could cripple privacy and security in one fell swoop:

The Secretary of Commerce— shall have access to all relevant data concerning (critical infrastructure) networks without regard to any provision of law, regulation, rule, or policy restricting such access…