It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by warrenb
reply to post by KEMIK
they show no characteristics of Ball lightning
ball lightning does not hover or travel at slow speed
ball lightning is usually over before you know what you saw
and it usually has a tell tale "tail" of lightning
assuming of course that ball lightning is even a real phenomena and not some made up excuse to explain UFO's...
[edit on 22-6-2009 by warrenb]
When the film was finally returned to Mariana by the US Air Force, after a newspaper reported that Mariana complained about this confiscation, more than 30 images out of the 290 had been removed. According to Mariana, the first 30 images showed the objects more closely at the time when they were stationary, and a rotary ring around them could be distinguished. It is obvious, according to Mariana, that these first frames show neither birds nor jet fighters.
The Great Falls, Montana UFO Color Film August 15, 1950:
What is the meaning of this footage? For Captain Edward Ruppelt, head of USAF's Project Blue Book, the film shows two unidentified flying objects. They are not birds, they are not meteors, they are not aircraft, they are not clouds, they are not balloons. They are Unidentified Flying Objects. They qualify as "unknowns", which means in the Blue Book classification, that they are "true" UFOs. All experts that analyzed the video agree, except that they are not 100% sure that they were not aircraft. The Condon Report agrees. Moreover, the Condon Report's analysis adds that the discs are true elliptical shaped objects, disk shaped objects. More than 50 years later, the footage has kept its credibility, and that could not have been possible if it was faked or showing airplanes. It could be detected with today's technologies. Is it necessary here to recall that the Condon Report barely qualifies has a UFO promotion effort?
Originally posted by jkrog08
reply to post by tristar
I was just trying to compliment your thread. If you would read my thread you would see that I specified the interview was rehearsed, I do my research, my threads take days to make, let alone the research. I really do not understand you attitude dude. We are all in this together, it is not a competition. You presented a video, I presented two threads with further research into one of the videos in your OP. What would you have me do? My thread and easynow's is better than any online reference to the Tremonton case. By the way, the video in my thread was only a small part of the whole, and actually FYI I submitted that to ATS Premium 2 weeks ago, so I did not copy your thread if that is what you think. I was actually worried when I saw your post, I thought there might be some issue but there wasn't, well except for your statement, that was way out of line IMO. I really think you misunderstand my meaning here on ATS, but since you said "maybe I should look at your avatar", maybe you should have a look at my profile to see exactly what I am about and what I contribute. Again, this is not about me, you, or anyone; It is about all of us joining in unity to uncover the truth. So I am sorry if I offend you or whatever but I think you are blowing this out of proportion BIG TIME. I will not comment further on your thread.
[edit on 6/22/2009 by jkrog08]