Australian scientists may have worked out the mystery of teleportation, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 56 times


reply posted on 22-6-2009 @ 02:58 AM by Exuberant1
Originally posted by Pappa_Bear
Someone correct me if I am wrong here; but isn't teleportation the disassembly, movement to another location, and reassembly of an organic or inorganic object?


You are correct.

But data can also be teleported. And while it is not tangible, it does exist.

Instantaneous transport of data across space is a big step.

Quantum entanglement has been known of for quite some time now, I am glad that its potential for communication is being explored publicly.

I would like to see this sort of experiment done with the transmission of data across large distances.

We can already transmit data into the past - before it hes been sent.
Here is how it works:

"Let's say that Alice on a space station sends a signal to Bob, who is on a distant space ship. Let's call Alice's frame of reference S, and Bob's frame of reference S'. If Bob's space ship is traveling away from Alice at a significant portion of the speed of light, then in S' event B can happen before event A, so according to Bob, the signal is received before it's sent, just as we said could be the case. More importantly, by choosing Bob's speed fast enough, we can make B occur as long before A as we want. Since, according to the principle of relativity, the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference, Bob should be able to use the same technique Alice did to send a superluminal signal back to Alice, and he can make it have the same speed according to S' that Alice's signal had according to S.

Ok, so here's the trick, if we make sure Bob is going really fast, then he can receive the signal long before it's sent, so when Bob sends his superluminal signal back to Alice it will arrive back at Alice's space station (event C) before Alice ever sent her signal in the first place (event A). What's more, since events A and C both happen at Alice's position, and Alice is moving at less than the speed of light (by assumption), then A and C have a timelike separation. This means that if C happens before A in frame S', then C happens before A in every frame of reference. Put another way, C is inside the past light cone of A, which will be true in every frame of reference. So as long as she has a fast enough moving relay station, like Bob's space ship, Alice can send messages into her own past. "
-Unperson

*We already have the technology that reflects an incoming signal in just one direction, always - no matter what... And it is also old technology. This would make sure that the beam always went to the right place in the past.

what's more: the efficiency of this technology has been increased by over four (possible five) orders of magnitude over the past 28 years.

[edit on 22-6-2009 by Exuberant1]


reply posted on 22-6-2009 @ 03:35 AM by Applesandoranges
Originally posted by ctjctjctj
reply to
post by Applesandoranges



Yes, I read the book entitled Anastasia.

Life is in fact Paradise. Ironically, we have distanced ourselves from Nature over the generations.



Very true indeed.


reply posted on 22-6-2009 @ 03:44 AM by The_4th_horseman
reply to post by Cygnus_Hunter


Maxwells' Demon Solved
extrapolated hypothetical harmonic photon fractals

A simple question, does "11d predictive analysis of quantum theory of photons using a 7d navigation logic structure which requires no calculation for "11d harmonic Fibonacci fractals", just logic

use ALL "sides" of the 3-D-reality versus the hyperspace companion dimension boundary at the same time in the same equation. Being able to flip into hyperspace and proceed there is one way in which 3-D objects could experience time travel or teleportation

Which is "static field manipulation value of the vacuum expectation value for particle ground state, and with this you time travel on a spiral wave d/dt". Using "N" for navigation


reply posted on 22-6-2009 @ 03:46 AM by odyseusz
Made in 1994. Old


[edit on 22-6-2009 by odyseusz]



reply posted on 22-6-2009 @ 03:50 AM by The_4th_horseman
Originally posted by odyseusz
Made in 1994. Old


[edit on 22-6-2009 by odyseusz]



But can you do this with no calculator? Just using a barebrain, no education, just intuition? I can


reply posted on 22-6-2009 @ 03:50 AM by ocker
QUANTUM- ATOM -OPTICS
a copy from their web site
www.acqao.org...

The Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Quantum-Atom Optics (ACQAO) combines pre-eminent Australian theoretical and experimental research groups in quantum and atom optics. Our aim is to create a powerful network to advance the rapidly developing field of Quantum-Atom Optics .

We are exploiting the quantum nature of multiple particle quantum states of atoms and photons, including entangled light and Bose-Einstein condensates (BEC). The Centre focuses on fundamental research, but our long term goal is to underpin and develop the next generation quantum technology.

Quantum-atom optics research at ACQAO comprises six experimental projects directed and supported by a central theory core. For a detailed description of the research activities in the Centre, please click on the project titles in the diagram below.

ACQAO is a multiuniversity collaboration involving the Australian National University, Swinburne University of Technology and University of Queensland.


reply posted on 22-6-2009 @ 03:55 AM by The_4th_horseman
reply to post by misfitoy



wave / particles are seen from 2 dimension with 2d results, quantum theory predicts 3 solutions, as the result was a 2d answer? Pretty simple

Eg; a cube most people think has ONLY 3d, quantum theory "should" have 13d to "create" the cube. Harmonic Spiral mechanics, but to "see" the cube requires 14d.

No calculator needed, this should take 2 minutes to solve - logic


reply posted on 22-6-2009 @ 04:07 AM by The_4th_horseman
reply to post by ocker



Simple tachyon structures require 2 points, Omega and "N", that will "always" be true. Both exist, this explains the "past" & future" variables. Navigation requires using the "now", let's call that variable "Aleph".

You can bend light throught time in your mind, or apply this to spin inertia navigation. Just use inverse variables.

harmonics can be one of several keys.

This took me 5 minutes to understand and comprehend.


reply posted on 22-6-2009 @ 04:12 AM by The_4th_horseman
reply to post by Pappa_Bear



Almost correct, use an inverse variable (shadow) & we are already there


reply posted on 22-6-2009 @ 04:12 AM by misfitoy
Originally posted by The_4th_horseman
reply to
post by misfitoy



wave / particles are seen from 2 dimension with 2d results, quantum theory predicts 3 solutions, as the result was a 2d answer? Pretty simple

Eg; a cube most people think has ONLY 3d, quantum theory "should" have 13d to "create" the cube. Harmonic Spiral mechanics, but to "see" the cube requires 14d.

No calculator needed, this should take 2 minutes to solve - logic


Erm.... was that response meant to go to my post??

I was just saying that this subject reminded me of a movie...



reply posted on 22-6-2009 @ 04:15 AM by Exuberant1
Originally posted by The_4th_horseman
reply to
post by ocker



...No calculator needed, this should take 2 minutes to solve - logic ...

...This took me 5 minutes to understand and comprehend....



You must be the smartest kid in your whole class.

Apparently you didn't hear the bad news about tachyons - you must update your info; one of your variables has changed.




[edit on 22-6-2009 by Exuberant1]


reply posted on 22-6-2009 @ 04:16 AM by The_4th_horseman
reply to post by Adroc



There is no time barrier, just a human perception, we "remember" yesterday, "see tomorrow" & experince today".

Quote "Use the Force Luke" = StarWars


reply posted on 22-6-2009 @ 04:18 AM by ocker
reply to post by The_4th_horseman



Optical entanglement is a key requirement for many quantum communication protocols. Conventionally, entanglement is formed between two distinct beams, with the quantum correlation measurements being performed at separate locations. Such setups can be complicated, requiring the repeated combination of complex resources, a task that becomes increasingly difficult as the number of entangled information channels, or modes, increases. too pave the way towards the realization of optical multimode quantum information systems by showing continuous variable entanglement between two spatial modes within one beam. the technique is a major advance towards practical systems with minimum complexity. We demonstrate three major experimental achievements. First, only one source is required to produce squeezed light in two orthogonal spatial modes. Second, entanglement is formed through lenses and beam rotation, without the need for a beamsplitter. Finally, quantum correlations are measured directly and simultaneously using a multipixel quadrant detector.


reply posted on 22-6-2009 @ 04:29 AM by The_4th_horseman
reply to post by ocker



Thanks for you input, much appreciated ; )

Quote
"Optical entanglement is a key requirement for m(any) quantum communication protocols. Conventionally, entanglement is formed between two distinct beams", that is correct, but to "see" this result of "only" 2 light entanglements requires a 3rd variable, which is in the "seeing". eg; Shroedinger

Do you need the inertia variable of navigation? There are 3 or more dimensions needed.

No calculator needed
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 7 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 8 days ago with 72 member flags
Renowned Geophysicist Says Strange Sky Sounds Are Real
  Posted 1 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 19 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 7 days ago with 49 member flags