Originally posted by Electro38
To the people criticizing this post. You are missing the point, it's not really about one person, Neda. It's what she represents symbolically, i.e.
the oppression of the people in Iran and their current struggle.
And how funny that some are calling this propaganda or manipulative or contrived. For the first time in history the people doing the actual protesting
and defiance are the ones who are also doing the mainstream reporting via internet, youtube, twitter, and with cellphone cameras!
So now I guess they're (the people protesting in the streets of Iran) trying to manipulate us with some kind of propaganda? Wow. And by the way that
video was released on the internet way before the main media started showing it in it's heavily censored form. We couldn't even see her face when TV
media started showing it.
I just wanted to add that I am surprised by the anti-Iranian tone in this thread, as well as the misogynistic attitude.
No one's diminishing the struggles and atrocities in Iraq, or any other place.
So were feeble minded idiots because we're using the symbolism and imagery of what happened to that girl as a basis for broader understanding of
what's happening there?
If it's a powerful symbol and it moves people towards a greater good why should it be unimportant or why do you need to diminish it?
[edit on 22-6-2009 by Electro38]
Fair enough. We are not disputing the need for an umbrella symbol to represent a movement. Many of our points are based on the question of "why does
it always have to be a woman"? Men are being victimized in this world by the elites all the same, yet it seems that women are the only ones people
seem to care about. This is an equality matter, no matter where you are in the world. Men are being overlooked as the symbols they should be as well.
Why not have a symbol that covers men and women alike? Why just a woman? Ok so, alot of men are doing the oppressing over there,but they're the men
of a tyranical government also. The men in the streets fight for equality and freedom. In the states, however men are getting looked over in droves,
even forgotten. The male is the minority now and are oppressed by women these days and the favor they seem to be getting from government. I'm just
saying, why not use this man as a
symbol?
Graphic Content- -Please do not open
if squeemish to graphic images. This guy died the same as Neda, yet he lies in the street, not a martyr for his cause, but a carcas to be
overlooked while a pretty female gets all the attention because of simply being a female. With all due respect to women, I am just a little tired of
the double standard of women being victimized (the same as men) in this supposed equal world while they also get to scream "I am woman hear me
roar"...are you a victim who should have the world pity you for every injustice that happens to a woman or are you the "lioness that roars" and
don't need all of this extra attention and favor from government? Like someone said back a few posts, a million men can die and nothing, yet one
woman dies and the world turns over on their ear. It just seems like when I look into the dictionary under 'equality', this will not be the
representation or definition I will be reading about. Let's give some of the men credit over there as well, only then can we be assured that we are
headed in the right direction concerning equality. I had better silence myself from any further posts though. I have heard of many on here actually
losing their accounts for speaking out against feminism and against the ostensible hypocrisy of equality between men and women. On that note, I
digress any further steps toward the line in the sand. I do, however, think the men over there need a little credit though as they are marching and
dying right beside of the women.
[edit on 22-6-2009 by Phenomium]