reply to post by ufoenthusiast
] By the way, in your other post you mentioned that Dr. Zeki Eker said it was possible that it was a hoax. But in the TUBITAK report, it says that it
was definitely not CGI or a model, and that the footage was genuine.
I think you’re missing the point here. As I have said the whole analysis is nothing but merely a preliminary examination (01/31/2008) which says
that because of the lack of reference no particulars can be made regarding location, distance, size or the nature of the object itself.
After having made this conclusion I find it strange to say the least, to conclude that it is no model.
I don’t know how much they would have charged for further examination and to film other objects under the same circumstances using special equipment
However, Mr. Akdoğan and/or his organisation seems to have made no further (financial) efforts to let them investigate a little further and rather
decided to keep the money.
Your reasoning is quite funny, you firstly refer to the TUBITAK as an authority which backs up the authenticity of the footage but then you don’t
wonder why they aren’t convinced by the filmed objects to be some craft with occupants as you are. They don’t seem to be that much impressed by
the overwhelming evidence either.
If Prof. Dr. Zeker is the authority you refer to then go ask him what else it possibly might be.
So um yeah, lol... my question is, what other possible way could they have "hoaxed" this then? What, did they fly a remote controlled hover craft
and record it with a camera? Oh wait, let me guess, it's just a superior mirage illusion caused by an old saucer test craft that sunk into the ocean
during WWII but floated back up to the surface recently. Those pesky old ships!
You have a vivid fantasy. Unfortunately this is your problem not mine. You should use it creatively writing books or drawing.
I don’t believe the TUBITAK report (which as I mentioned was and is only preliminary) that it can’t be a model used in a way which creative minds
like yours have filmed in some way.
Again, if they can’t make any statement regarding location, distance or size, how are they able to say it is conclusively no model???
And ofcourse Dr. Eker, the director of a prestigious, state-run scientific institute isn't going to come out and say, "yeah, it's definitely of
extraterrestrial origin," because he certainly has no proof to make that claim. HOWEVER, let us take a closer look at some of the occupants inside,
I’d rather not – I’m scared to death! Have you tried to estimate their size?
I neither have your fantasy nor your medication. It’s useless to try identifying some alleged occupants from a cluster of pixels.
Btw where is the original footage (uncut) which was supposed to be made public?
I’d like to blow up some pixels myself, if I may - adding some of the missing time in the footage, deciding whether the frames in question are
relevant or not.
As your nickname implies dear “ufoenthusiast” you are a little too enthusiastic - try to be more sober instead.
[edit on 22-6-2009 by necati]