reply to post by Blaine91555
The issue of these racist paper has been on many other threads, and I think bldrvgrs response answers a lot of your accusations. I would be more than
happy to discuss this issue with you on another thread or through u2u, but I would like to focus on something else here.
Even if Ron Paul is a horrible racists, and those papers were signed by him and he believed every word written, does that mean that you refuse to
believe anything the man says, even if it is logical? I only ask because your post seems to be an attempt at derailing the thread. Instead of
arguing the merits of what Paul said as to why he voted and if those reasons were logical or not, you just call him a racist.
Do you agree that the constitution says we should stay out of other countries affairs. Do you agree that the same excuse of helping the human rights
of the people of a country have been used as an excuse for every unjust war we have been involved with in recent history? Do you agree with the fact
that our media is a corporate run propaganda machine?
These are the questions I am interested in your opinion on. Yelling racism and moving on is not an answer, and as long as people have such kneejerk
reactions, the world will never change for the better. I accept the fact for all of the reasons stated above people should have voted against this
bill. Rather that was Ron Pauls reasoning or not may be in question, but you have yet to give one reason to vote for this bill.
And yes, racism should be fought and shunned, and if Ron Paul is found to be a racist, he should be held accountable, but not at the expense of
refusing to be logical. Hate the man if you must, not the facts he uses.


