It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera
Two narrow-angle cameras (NACs) on the Lunar
Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) will make high
resolution black-and-white images of the surface, capturing
images of the poles with resolutions down to 1 m
(3.3 feet). Up to 10% of the lunar surface will be imaged
with the NACs. A third, wide-angle camera (WAC), will
take color and ultraviolet images over the complete lunar
surface at 100 m resolution. These images will show
polar lighting conditions, identify potential resources and
hazards, and aid selection of safe landing sites.
LRO will spend at least one year in low polar orbit around the Moon, collecting detailed information about the Lunar environment. The LRO payload, comprised of six instruments and one technology demonstration, will provide key data sets to enable a human return to the Moon.
Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
You must think it a bit odd no photos of a flag on the nearside - or any of the past Apollo equipment has been seen? Does this not skewer NASA into the realm of just being a tad deceptive?
Originally posted by easynow
so this means they will have 10% of the surface overall and only the polar regions in high resolution pictures ?
the 100m resolution is probably for Google Moon.
any idea what the ratio was on the past L.O. missions ?
Originally posted by zorgon
But jack from Pegasus has good reason to believe he knows where the missing Lunokhod 1 Russian rover is (based on a laser signal return) so we submitted that. Will report if we have any success.
So I figured it was my duty to hold up the end of the conspiracy nuts
That's the problem, full coverage with high resolution takes time, and apparently they are not interested in it.
There is no need for that, I think Clementine photos have full coverage at 100 metres per pixel or even 10 metres per pixe.
No, but I will check.
the picture is shown out of context.
Originally posted by easynow
reply to post by no1dea
the picture is shown out of context.
the full picture of the moon shown....puts that anomaly in the correct perspective if you ask me.
NASA is even using the same color perspective now in their videos
@ Zorgon..
pay no attention to trolling. Pegasus website is awesome ! i have learned alot from the information you have provided and will always be thankful you took the time to do this for everyone.
[edit on 21-6-2009 by easynow]
Originally posted by Sam60
reply to post by watchZEITGEISTnow
Regarding the flag pictures, I wouldn't think they could take a picture from orbit with sufficient resolution to visualise the flag.
Or, do you disagree?
This is the best we can get from Google Maps, and it's even resized to at least 200%.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/ad279909e57fdf92.jpg[/atsimg]
Now imagine that small flag that was left on the Moon, do you still expect to see it on satellite photos?
...we clearly see what appears to be a huge tower or statue, buildings, and, of course, road (10 miles long).
Originally posted by Sam60
Regarding the flag pictures, I wouldn't think they could take a picture from orbit with sufficient resolution to visualise the flag.
Or, do you disagree?
Originally posted by Sam60
I think we'll find it's not possible as yet.
Originally posted by Raider of Truth
Why is everyone saying they are bombing the moon? lol!
Originally posted by drsmooth23
Essentially, from a summer solstice view; from stone henge or such, the sun MAY appear to be in between earth and the "center" of the milky way.