Are the soldiers who protect America bad?, page 8
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9    10    11  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 27 times


reply posted on 20-6-2009 @ 08:08 PM by Eight
Originally posted by ofhumandescent
If you are a Christian one of the commandments said, "thou shalt not kill".

Period, no if ands or buts and it's the shortest and most direct of all the "commandments".

Frig, I'm not even "Christian" and I can see the logic.


There is no logic, only hypocrisy.

Yes, God said "Thou shall not kill." But God violated his own commandment when he ordered the destruction of entire cities, just to allow the Jews to have a homeland in the Middle East. Also the with the Bible, I can confirm that this same God ordered the killing of thousands of people. Isn't this hypocrisy?

You should know that Christianity is the cause of more problems and wars than anything else and IMO the Bible is always a poor tool to use to justify one’s position, especially on the issue of killing.




Killing in the name of a god, a country, a law or for any reason is wrong.No one has the right to take the life of another nor make another's life unbearable.


So explain the Salem Witch Hunts and the Crusades.



The act of war is the mass murdering of fellow human beings and I don't care or want to hear "Well their doing it" two wrongs don't make a right and if you condon war or murder of any kind you have gone over to the dark side and have sunk to the level of those who practice and condon the taking of another's life.


This is the first thing that comes to anyone’s mind when war is the issue. You mention war and visions of death, horror, destruction, pain and suffering is the only thing you see.And rightly so because these things are the reality of war.




[edit on 20-6-2009 by Eight]

[edit on 20-6-2009 by Eight]


reply posted on 20-6-2009 @ 08:10 PM by badmedia
reply to post by brackforce



Wrong. If Jesus fulfills the laws, and he does not kill people then obviously the law is to not kill people.

In fact, rather than take up evil and fight for his own defense, he refuses to become evil in himself and do such things. Even going so far as to heal the man who's ear was cut off.

Killing people = a path of death and destruction.

What is the status quo of this world? To get people to kill to save themselves. What does Jesus say? If you do things to save yourself, you actually condemn yourself because you will be walking a path of death and destruction rather than following the example.


Matthew 10:28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

Matthew 10:39He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it.


Why are you justifying such actions? As a means of saving your own life and body. And this is the status quo for getting people to walk a path of death and destruction. Make them feel as if their lives are in danger, and in response they will take up that path. It's a deception.

You'll never live in a society that doesn't include evil things if you yourself do evil things. Your very presence would negate the society.



reply posted on 20-6-2009 @ 08:25 PM by badmedia
Originally posted by Eight
There is no logic, only hypocrisy.

Yes, God said "Thou shall not kill." But God violated his own commandment when he ordered the destruction of entire cities, just to allow the Jews to have a homeland in the Middle East. Also the with the Bible, I can confirm that this same God ordered the killing of thousands of people. Isn't this hypocrisy?

You should know that Christianity is the cause of more problems and wars than anything else and IMO the Bible is always a poor tool to use to justify one’s position, especially on the issue of killing.


Try reading 1 Samuel. God was the one who judged the people. The people of Israel wanted a king to judge them instead, and so they rejected god in favor of governments and kings. To which god replies - this is the manner in which you will be ruled, and it talks of the kings and such which basically take and take from the people.

Furthermore, the reason Jesus had to do what he did in the first place was due to the misunderstandings of the people on the laws. Thus, he fulfills them in order to bring proper understanding of things.

The reason it is said to be ok for god to do such a thing, but not for people is that god being "all knowing" would be the only one who could properly judge such a thing.

I am not a Christian, but I am a big fan of Jesus and do understand what he is saying and such. It doesn't even matter to me if he is real or not, either way he was right and spoke the truth. If not real, whoever wrote the story had the wisdom.



So explain the Salem Witch Hunts and the Crusades.


Matthew 7


20Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.

21Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.

22Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?

23And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

24Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock:

25And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock.

26And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand:

27And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.


Iniquity means sin. What he is saying is look at their fruits to know if they are good or bad, not what they say. So, you would be looking at their actions.

Just because many people will do things in his name does not mean they are correct. And that is what he is saying. He says many will point out the wonderful things they have done in his name, but he will say he knows them not because the things they did were sins. Their actions were not good, and no amount of lip service changes that.

The start of that chapter starts out - judge not, yest you be judged. And that pretty much rules out your example as being a reflection of Jesus. He would tell those people - I know you not.




This is the first thing that comes to anyone’s mind when war is the issue. You mention war and visions of death, horror, destruction, pain and suffering is the only thing you see.And rightly so because these things are the reality of war.

The causes of war are as various as the causes of disputes between married couples, some of the causes for war are nationalism, imperialism, militarism and of course, lets not forget human nature. So in a way it is useless to hope that reasons for going to war, one day will be totally eliminated.


People do it out of ignorance. They believe themselves to be flesh, and so they do things which save the flesh. As they do not know the truth, they fear. And because of their fears, such as 9/11, they will support wars and the path of death and destruction in order to save that flesh. Get someone to fear for their life, make them think that is the end, and they will stop at almost nothing to save themselves.


John 3

6That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.

7Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.


Know thyself. If you think you are flesh, then you do not know yourself. You think of your posessions as being "you". your indicated possession. Your body? Your flesh? Such is not you.

Don't have to be a Christian to know and understand such things, just need to seek.


reply posted on 20-6-2009 @ 08:32 PM by hotpinkurinalmint
reply to post by network dude



Give me one specific instance of how I am better off because of something the US military did in the past 50 years. I can give you several reasons why we are worse off because of the US military's thirst for blood and tax dollars.


reply posted on 20-6-2009 @ 08:44 PM by hotpinkurinalmint
reply to post by jerico65



So we need to spend $10 billion a month in Iraq for cross-over research? Could we not just directly fund this research by giving more money to agencies like the NIH?

Even though enlisted soldiers' salaries are not that high, there are people other than enlisted soldiers that profit off the military. Haliburton made a killing as a result of the Iraq war. So did many defense contractors. I live in a military town and know tons of ex-soldiers with minimal skill sets that get paid fairly well to work for defense contractors.



reply posted on 20-6-2009 @ 11:50 PM by jeasahtheseer
Originally posted by EYEOFEAGLE
Do you remember that day? You know September 11, 2001. Wow, what an aweful day for the America. What were you doing on that day and how did you feel when you got your briefing or saw the news when you woke up that morning?

Well, I remember just fine. Can you imagine how I felt? I had been in war before and then here and there and every time I was absolutly terrified before every vacation. But that day, that day was different. That day the there was no fear, only who and where. Every man and every woman that wears that uniform, no matter if you are a Marine, Army, Air Force or Swabby, ( sorry doc, you know you deserve it) know what that feeling is and they know why they are wearing that uniform. They just know. And until you know what this feeling is you have no reason, ( you have the right ) but you have no reason to spit on they who wear the uniform. A war criminal yes, after he or she is proven guilty in a court of law but not a second before. In their mind they are wearing that uniform for you and the person next to you and the person next to them.

JUST REMEMBER PEOPLE, DON'T EVER TRY AND TELL SOMEONE HOW TO DRIVE A 911 TURBO IF YOU HAVE NEVER BEEN BEHIND THE WHEEL OF ONE. IT IS ONE OF THINGS THAT WORDS JUST CAN NOT DESCRIBE.

And if you are one of the punks that do decide to try and spit on a serviceman or woman, DO NOT LET ME SEE YOU DO IT. Let's just say I have alot invested in them!


Semper Fi,

Eye of Eagle


I


good post i completely agree. i'm willing to bet that a good portion of the the people that say all that stuff don't even know one single person in the military let alone serve in it and they form all their opionons from reading ats and other sites and watching the news.

[edit on 21-6-2009 by jeasahtheseer]


reply posted on 21-6-2009 @ 04:18 AM by Bunken Drum
reply to post by JaxonRoberts
Re: "representatives and ambassadors of the US" Are you suggesting that I can't tell the difference between fear & good manners? Re: "Never get in front of the Yanks" As I understand it from serving British soldiers, that expression has nothing to do with ferocity or tenacity, but rather indiscriminate shooting of anything that moves. Thus if one is deployed ahead of US forces, one must worry about being shot in the back by them. The point I was trying to make is that trigger pulling is not evidence of courage, whereas in many instances not taking precipitate action is much more difficult & thus may well indicate courage. More broadly, who is braver, the person who sees a threat & goes to fight, or the person who can live with the threat & seeks a negotiated solution? Imho it is simply not true that only those in uniform are brave, & thus anyone who attempts to characterise a person as cowardly for criticising military personnel is @best disingenuous.



reply posted on 21-6-2009 @ 06:42 AM by mf_luder
reply to post by Bunken Drum



I wasn't going to grace your rubbish with a response at first.

But believe me when I say I in no way need any kind of weapon to prove my courage or who I am and I can "slap people around" just as well as any man from wherever it is you hail from.

To address the little "don't get in front of the yanks" comment - I hit what I was aiming at over there - and it didn't include friendly forces. So take your veiled little attempts at insults elsewhere. They remind me of nothing more than sad rhetoric we are all tired of hearing over and over again.


reply posted on 21-6-2009 @ 07:12 AM by Eight
reply to post by badmedia




To avoid derailing this thread, you or I can start a thread in the theology forum and debate this topic which is clearly about religion.


reply posted on 21-6-2009 @ 07:31 AM by mf_luder
reply to post by Drexl



and I suppose you would valiantly run out into the middle of an artillery barrage?



[edit on 21-6-2009 by mf_luder]
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9    10    11  >>    ^^TOP^^



Sno-Trains..A short History..(with short video)
  Posted 16 days ago with 16 member flags
Pictures: Civil War Sub H.L. Hunley Finally Revealed
  Posted 10 days ago with 5 member flags
Neuroscience the new face of warfare: experts
  Posted 6 days ago with 5 member flags
Congress Passes Bill That Opens US Skies To Unmanned Drones
  Posted 5 days ago with 4 member flags
The Latest in Terminator Tech
  Posted 4 days ago with 3 member flags
U.S. Navy to test 32 megajoule EM Railgun in the coming weeks
  Posted 3 days ago with 3 member flags

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

This Hoax Effects Everyone!!!
  Political Conspiracies, Posted 12 hours ago, 55 flags
My opinion about this site's purpose
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 45 flags
Rothschilds Want Iran’s Banks
  World War Three, Posted 13 hours ago, 32 flags
I'm sick of all the KOOKS!
  Rant, Posted 13 hours ago, 22 flags
New Topic Fire-hose censoring
  Rant, Posted 8 hours ago, 12 flags