The Fathers that translated the Bible were of ONE opinion...they didn't simply translate into their OWN thinking.
Okay, if we're talking solely translation, then riddle me this: if those translating were of ONE opinion, why are there about 15 different english translations?
If we're actually talking about those responsible for compilation as well as translations, are you honestly saying there were no disagreements at the Council of Nicea? Everyone just got together to make a list of the things that they all already agreed on? Highly doubtful.
I knew it was only a matter of time before that 2 Timothy verse reared its ugly head. You see, that was written in a letter to Timothy. At the time that it was written, the letter certainly was not considered scripture, nor were any of the other letters of the new testament, nor even any of the new testament. So if you're going to use that verse, then really you're using it to mean 'all Old Testament scripture is given by inspiration blah blah'.
And if you're not going to use it that way, then I might as well write another book to the bible which includes in its texts 'All of this stuff is true, including this extra book even though none of the other bibles have it. Seriously, this book comes from God too, trust me'. And then use that 'verse' as proof of my book's authenticity.
Honestly, using the bible as proof of the bible is about as specious as it gets.


