FBI: Child Pornography Found on Alleged Museum Shooter's Computer

FBI: Child Pornography Found on Alleged Museum Shooter's Computer

www.foxnews.com

WASHINGTON — Child pornography was found on a computer belonging to the white supremacist charged with shooting and killing a security guard at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, the FBI said in court documents.

(visit the link for the full news article)

I posted this because I want to see if anyone else thinks that this child porn could have been planted there to further vilify the holocaust museum gunman? Although this guy did do something horrible, history seems to show that doing anything negative toward Jewish people will warrant the strongest reactions and actions by the USA and Israel. I wouldn't be surprised if the FBI was told to "lump in" a child porn allegation just for good measure since he desecrated the Holocaust Museum.

www.foxnews.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

Now fox will say 911 truthers are paedos or something.

the police are all dodgy so who knows?

reply to post by Yetichi


Naw, it was probably real. Although, if im not mistaken, child porn is anything with a girl/boy under 18, so if he had some vintage girls gone wild videos and a 17 year old is doing something naughty, LEO can slam him with CHILD PORN charges.

You can also get busted for having child porn in your browser history. So if somebody sends you a link to a video of a girl under 18, and click it, then immediately close the window, it's still in your history, and LEO can charge you for CHILD PORN there too. Even if you clear your history, the information is still on your hard drive. You would have to erase/write random binary on your hard drive 7x over to stop LEO from finding it and slamming you with charges.


Who knows what videos he had exactly, if any. I'm guessing this is a trumped up charge, though.

I think that is very possible but will it will come from a popular blog or another popular radio show and won't happen for some time. If there is some major Truther event or discovery in the future, the powers that be will look back for a good way to advance their attack and this pedo charge against this wacko will be perfect ammo.

Convenient, huh.

Why would this be released to the public other than to make sure this guy looks as bad as possible. There are many people who hate jews and might feel sympathy for him, but no one wants to be associated with someone caught with child porn.

Be careful who you piss off, lest child porn be 'found' on your computer (and told to the news).

they should have made it little black boys for jokes. white supremacist hides secret stash of gary coleman child porn.

reply to post by Kaytagg


in sweden they recoered data from a hard drive that had been run over by a lorry , after being written with 1 and 0, 300 times then crushed.

the only way to ever remove data is by melting it in acid.

edit:

news.bbc.co.uk...

^^ link to says just that

[edit on 19/6/09 by Harlequin]

Nah, I don't buy it.
The guy has had run ins with the law previous to this, so I doubt he'd be dumb enough to leave anything on his comp.
My guess is they went looking on his hard drive, found nothing and so planted the worst thing they could think of. Child Porn.

[edit on 19-6-2009 by Flighty]

reply to post by Primordial


My guess then, would be that the shooter is an intelligent, thoughtful person (Not to say he's a nice one).

What's more dangerous than a nutbag who shoots up a public venue?
A nutbag with a high IQ and aptitude for winning arguments or persuading people.

So naturally they have to turn him into a personality cult of hate (ironic, that's exactly what Hitler did to the jews), to stop him from undermining the governments authority.

It makes me wonder that if the FBI knew of this guy for decades that they wouldn't already have some kind of knowledge that he was collecting child porn and bust him long ago to make an example out of him.

Originally posted by Harlequin
reply to post by Kaytagg

 

in sweden they recoered data from a hard drive that had been run over by a lorry , after being written with 1 and 0, 300 times then crushed.

the only way to ever remove data is by melting it in acid.

edit:

news.bbc.co.uk...

^^ link to says just that

[edit on 19/6/09 by Harlequin]

Thanks

So, basically, if a picture of an underage girl in an explicit act has ever been written to your hard drive, for whatever reason, your fault or not, even if you're not aware of it, you're at risk of having your name plastered in the press like this guy.

One thing the powers that be do is discredit via sexual perversion. They wont come after you for anything that could lead back to them. I would not put it past them to plant child porn on him. Id think if someone was gonna go out john wayne style theyd have their personal affairs in order before doing so.

Not that he couldnt have been a pedo, I just find it odd that they wanted to see what porn he prefered when his house and computer had no part in the crime. Since they thought this guy was a 911 truther why wasnt this brought out from day one? Sounds fishy to me.

The prefered social psychological action targets females. One thing that repulses them is child porn. Psychology teaches us if you get the female the male follows and so do the children, obviously. Women dont pay attention to logic, they find it boring. So bringing up a large logical argument they would surely lose the attention of the female population.

Its like Ive told people, there are several things you can say about someone to discredit them. Call someone a rapist, a child molester, or a wife beater. Thats all you have to do, the general public will believe you and lynch them, no evidence required. Any evidence submitted to the contrary will be considered a conspiracy.

[edit on 19-6-2009 by Memysabu]

I can't even figure out why they would release this -- if it's even true. They obviously have enough evidence to convict him of murder, terrorist acts, walking into a public facility armed, etc.

I can't imagine the point of adding 1 - 3 years to his sentence for child porn.

Of course, it's common for inmates to harm and/or kill other inmates that were involved in acts against children -- so maybe they just want him killed in jail?

It's possible they planted it, or something like that. It would not surprise me in the least.

However, it is just as possible that it exists. Neo Nazis are a pretty perverse bunch, and alot of them are into kids and underage girls.

So either possibility exists here.

reply to post by Memysabu


You state that women do not pay attention to logic, that it bores them.

You care to explain this a little further? (If you are able to.) Your post has not bored me, consequently, does it follow that it is not logical?

Please explain yourself.

It appears you do not believe in sexual crimes against women and children. Why is that?

[edit on 19-6-2009 by ladyinwaiting]

reply to post by Yetichi


The first thing i thought of when i read the thread title was that the authorities may have planted it to make him look worse than he already does. However upon reading the article i see that they are not saying that it belongs to him yet .

Agents found the material on a desktop computer seized from the apartment in nearby Maryland where 88-year-old James von Brunn lived with his son and son's fiancee

Authorities will analyze who had access to the computer to determine whether the pornography was von Brunn's, or if it could have belonged to someone else, prosecutors said. No decisions on charges have been made

www.foxnews.com...

reply to post by Memysabu

The prefered social psychological action targets females. One thing that repulses them is child porn. Psychology teaches us if you get the female the male follows and so do the children, obviously. Women dont pay attention to logic, they find it boring. So bringing up a large logical argument they would surely lose the attention of the female population.

Would you care to back up your statement with facts backed up by credible research ? I would be quite interested to view your sources for this research.

my first thought was planted, I see ats is ahead of me

Social psychology 101, I made an A. Im not going to dig around for hours to take you to school. Try talking to a female you just met about science. Not going to happen without her falling asleep. Males and females are different and we think differently. Not an insult its just a fact of life.

If I was a social psychologist working for the government Id target women too. Its the easiest way to get into the household. When you realize this you can look at news and see the programming they are trying to do. I look at CNN (Which I read to see what the governments pushing) and I see it.

Look at the whole womens rights issue in Iran. Females in free countries eat that up. Makes them hate Iran and thats exactly what the government wants. Then they teach their kids Iran is bad and their BF or husband hears the same argument and you better believe he has to agree.

Most of that stuff isnt happening in Iran, so tell me why else they would target females in the USA with that propaganda? Its obvious to me. Anyhow not really what this threads about just pointing the MSM programming out.

Either youre awake at this point or youre not gonna be, thats pretty much what it boils down to.