Woman Ordered to Pay $1.92 Millon to multi-billion dollar U.S. corporation for Illegal Downloading, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 01:29 AM by ofhumandescent
reply to post by jd140

Do you live near a cell tower?

Music should be free.

I can see a good heart surgeon say being worth millions, the guy has to go into a chest cavity and fix a heart and if that heart belongs to your wife, husband or child you better hope he/she knows what the heck they are doing.

Many musicians are worth tens to hundreds of millions of dollars.

Go to knowyournetworth.com...

This is absolutely insane folks.

Just because you can sing and shake your booty you can make millions.

Are singers worth that much more than teachers say?

If you said yes than you are part of the reason our entire education system sucks big time.

The American value system is absolutely insane.


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 01:35 AM by jd140
reply to post by ofhumandescent



They are worth that much because they have a commodity people want. If people don't like what they are selling then they don't buy it.

Its pretty simple really.


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 01:36 AM by Hastobemoretolife
reply to post by jd140



It's happened with many artist, but also what happens is the major record labels that make up the RIAA are notorious for signing top notch talent and shelving them, leaving them to rot, happened to band I was acquainted with.

IP laws need to be drastically reformed. Downloads have no effect on how many albums an artist sells. It's a changing paradigm and the record companies are trying to milk it for all its worth while they still can.

My point and case is Lil' Wayne, he said something that ticked off all the DJ's and they leaked his whole album and Lil' Wayne still sold a million copies the first week.

The RIAA is losing money because they no longer hold a monopoly on the recording medium because of the internet. People have a wide range of music to choose from now.

They aren't losing any money from downloads. Like I said if I did download music and they brought me to court for sharing the music, I would ask them to show me the formula they used to come up with how much money they lost.



reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 01:38 AM by othello
reply to post by Hastobemoretolife



thanks for answering my question about youtube.I have another question about this court case.Why go after a woman who can't pay and leave the website where she downloaded it from alone?I know she is in the wrong but shouldn't the website where she downloaded the stuff be equally responsible? Ok last question if you are watching or listening to something on the internet(be it music or a movie) is it concidered downloading?I mean downloading is when you are copying something to your computer right?


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 01:40 AM by jd140
reply to post by Hastobemoretolife




Regardless on how much you think its not right what they do. The fact is that as of right now, at this moment, it is illegal to download music from the internet without paying for it.

The law is the law, no matter how much you disagree with it. She broke the law and is now paying the price. It sucks, but it is the law.


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 01:58 AM by Hastobemoretolife
reply to post by jd140 and othello



But this is the thing, she only downloaded the music, she didn't redistribute the music.

This court case has now set a precedent that if you go to a website and it is playing music and it downloads it to your computer you can now be sued for illegal downloads, because it got downloaded to your computer.

IP laws do not address the digital medium. It say right in the article the RIAA has brought 30000 lawsuits just like these and only 2 have ever gone to court.

There is no clear law, this is a case of judicial activism. The judge should have thrown this case out it shouldn't have ever gone to court.

Take the case of last.fm they were court ordered to pay for broadcast license even though the artist didn't bring up a suit. It was the RIAA that brought up the suit.

The justice system in this country is screwed, this woman should have never even gone to court. The precedent has already been set. The judiciary in this case made a mockery of our justice system.

And further more how did the RIAA get her information? They got it illegally just like ever other suit that was brought up. That is why only 2 out of 30000 have ever gone to court.

This court case has just set a very very bad precedent.

Edit to add - She did share the songs.

[edit on 19-6-2009 by Hastobemoretolife]


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 02:31 AM by JustAThought
Originally posted by jd140
reply to
post by ofhumandescent



They are worth that much because they have a commodity people want. If people don't like what they are selling then they don't buy it.

Its pretty simple really.


No it's because they are using broadcasting to reach millions of people. If a surgeon could do operations on millions of people through a broadcasting system he would be worth the same.


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 07:37 AM by ofhumandescent
reply to post by jd140

Your value system runs different than mine.

To me a heart surgeon who can repair a aeorta valve, a teacher who shapes my children's education and the back room cancer researchers are worth way more than say Beyonce jiggling around.

Now come on Beyonce is worth 315 million dollars. Do YOU really think this is logical and sane?

The The median expected salary for a typical Surgeon - Heart Transplant in the United States is $416,227. www.chacha.com... (My heart surgeon's wife says that is about right).

Teachers and child care workers don't make near what they are worth as they shape our next generations thinking.

A warped value system is part of the reason our planet is so fuc&%d up.

Just because "that's the way it is and that's the what people buy" doesn't make it logical or correct.

Again, the asylum is being run by the inmates and that's part of the reason for the massive amount of injustices.

If you ever find yourself needing a valve replacement you might be thinking differently on what people are really worth.

Music and art should be free.

Charging someone (a common smuck) millions of dollars for a few songs is absolutely insane and unjust. She was charged that because she tried to screw a big corporation and not the singer personally. America is run by the large corporations.

We are allowed to steal from each other but boy don't get caught stealing from one of the "little kings/corporations".

These "stars" are controlled by major corporations and they have a strangle hold on the common man.

You have never ran a yellow light, or broken any "laws"? (Running a yellow may now net you a pricey ticket because of all the cameras going up at intersections).

Some of our "laws" are unjust and wrong.

The lady should have been made to pay $1.00 a song period.

But then again, I think music and art should be free and shared.

Next "they" will start taxing water and air and I guess you would go along with that too because "it's the law".


[edit on 19-6-2009 by ofhumandescent]


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 11:24 AM by jd140
reply to post by ofhumandescent



Look you can cry about it all you want. It won't change anything. Whaa Whaa Beyonce makes more then my heart surgeon, Whaa Whaa".

I think the heart surgeon is charging way to much to save someones life. One is for entertainment and the other is for life. Charging half a million for heart surgerory is a rip off.

One can choose not to buy a 12 dollar CD. That person cannot choose whether or not to need heart surgery. They either get it or die. Yep half a million just so that they can live.

Does that sound right in your book?

edit to add- yes I have broken the law. When I get ticketed I don't complain about the price. I accept my punishment and pay it. I don't try to get out of it by showing up to court and hoping the officer doesn't. I take responsibility for my actions.




[edit on 19-6-2009 by jd140]


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 11:28 AM by jd140
reply to post by InfaRedMan




A lack of reading comprehension is a bad thing.

I have already stated that the fine was steep. She did break the law though.

I have also said that artists are paid poorly.


I have pretty much said everything you stated.


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 12:46 PM by Daedalu
Stop buying there music and movies for just one month and it will bring them to there knees!
Tactics like these are uncalled for. They are not even going after the people who are putting up the sites, and they The RIAA are putting up sites to bait kids to download so they can go after there family's

They also claim that there system is perfect , well there are many programs out that can mask and ghost MAC address. I am not going to post them here as not to show people where they are.
We know that they have the power to go after and stop the sites that are hosting the music and the movies, but they do not. No it is easier to get the government to let them go after people who do not have the money to defend there case! Now I do not condone stealing anyone's product, ever . But I do not condone what the RIAA is doing now to there own customer's.

As they state now if someone hacks your router and downloads off your internet you are the one that has to pay the fine,even though you did not let it happen and a crime was committed to get it done! Now think about that.

It is like saying when you friend comes to your house and his car is stolen from your front yard you are the one that is responsible for the crime. Look this up and see. Call your cable company and ask them about this law . Then you will see. I did and was shocked by what I was told! And I was also told that Congress last year put this law into effect just before the change of presidents .
People really need to check on this so they will know what is up and how they are using this to there advantage .
Also all the RIAA has to do is contact the Cable company and say they want the name and address of this person and all your info will be given to them. And you will be given a notice that you have 24 hours to prove you did not do this and that no one used your equipment to download and or you will be shut down in 24 hours, this is without due process of law. You are also told to delete any software that let you download files on the internet, ie a bit torrent program. And it is stated in the letter that you will have to pay $250.000 dollars for what they said you did or they will prosecute in a court of law, but that is after you have been shut down from the internet and all of your communication's have been taken from you.

And how are you going to prove that you did not do this? There is no way to prove a negative and no matter how much you claim that you did not do anything you will be charged!

Check for your self and see!
There are cases going on here in the mid west where hundred's of cable users are getting these letters from there cable company's.
One lady that got one is 87 years old and is in big trouble, but the system was put in by her grandson who is in Iraq , and was done so he could talk to his Great Grand mother. It has been proven that she does not know more that how to turn on the system to get the email and chat with here Grand Son.
So the ones who think this is a good thing and the RIAA is just trying to stop some real bad people then check and find out for your self, then come back here and post!


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 06:24 PM by ofhumandescent
reply to post by jd140

Making half a million a year not per surgery.

And a heart surgeon making under half a million a year is not as ludicris as a singer or actor making tens of million a year.



reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 11:44 PM by jd140
Originally posted by ofhumandescent
reply to
post by jd140

Making half a million a year not per surgery.

And a heart surgeon making under half a million a year is not as ludicris as a singer or actor making tens of million a year.





One is making money entertaining and the other is making money from sick people.

Seems to me the immoral one is the person charging someone a small fortune to save their life.


reply posted on 20-6-2009 @ 12:20 AM by R3KR
You want to read something really sad, try this...

www.todays-woman.net...

They should have asked all the people accusing her of wrong doing if they have ever song happy birthday in public, if they have its illegal !!!

Happy Birthday is copyrighted, by guess who - Time Warner !!!!



[edit on 20-6-2009 by R3KR]
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Alaska: Samantha Koenig Kidnapped last week.
  Posted 2 days ago with 111 member flags
Blue Spheres Fall from the Sky in the UK
  Posted 15 days ago with 81 member flags
The Chinese have seen the dragon in the sky !!
  Posted 2 days ago with 68 member flags
Strange Sounds in Sky Explained by Scientists
  Posted 11 days ago with 59 member flags
She Dialed 911. The Cop Who Came to Help Raped Her.
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags
Anonymous: Revealing The Arcane Legal Trick Behind ACTA
  Posted 12 days ago with 42 member flags
Anonymous reveals Haditha massacre emails | RT
  Posted 7 days ago with 33 member flags

ATS Live North America is broadcasting in 44 minutes.
Today's Show: ATS Live: 96: Super powers, Falklands Woes, Stan Deyo Interview, Syria, Telepathy, The Devils Chord.