reply to post by Tentickles
While I have been an avid viewer of ATS for well over 10 years or more, this is my first post, as I feel this particular subject screams for my input.
I Apologize to anyone who may take offense in my post, as I mean none at all, but I have a cold hard fact to share with the ATS community as well as
all who read this (including the NSA, CIA and every letter of the alphabet orginization reading this).
As one poster mentioned, the pharmaceutical companies are increasing in both volume and demand across the globe. Manufacturing in America is almost
gone and in a short time it will be as extinct as many long lost animals, of which only remain in pictures.
There is (sadly) a viable solution and its a cold hard fact that will be hard to take in. Know first, I appreciate life, all life, all mankind and all
animals and insects alike. I understand their place and their purpose. I also understand that mankind has overcome the natural process of "survival
of the fittest" that nature shows us on a daily basis, so please do not judge me by what I am about to imply, state and impose.
The current global scenerio has a solution, but its an awful cold one. It's implications however are far too great to ignore and I seek debate from
all who read this, as I am in no way saying this is THE solution, it's the only obvious one that can resolve most of the current (global) issues, so
here we go:
Question #1: Who (as in what global entity) holds the largest manufacturing infrastructure?
Question #2: Who (as in what global entity) has the most problem with over-population?
Question #3: Who (globally) could benefit immensely (as in sustainability of life) from the eradication of such entity?
I'll not mention the entity as it becomes obvious to those who can see what I am implying. The solution then? Our (as in globally) top geneticists
need to build a virus from the gene level to target said entities. The virus will result in death of all who come in contact with such virus and have
a certain specific genetic trait and in particular, a certain specific gene.
As I said, this is a cold hard fact, but lets ponder this for a moment. By eliminating this entire entity, we open up enough resources and
infrastructure to provide jobs to the entire world, including those countries that have none of the above. Ethiopia could eat for once, families in
Burma could have the same chance at food and medicines that the top countries of the world have access to. The benefits of this could go on for days
just listing them all. For once in the known history of the world, the entire planet could have the same opportunities as the Americas and other
stabilized, democratic countries get to share in.
One might think for a minute that perhaps Russia would not accept such a scenerio but they too would jump on board if included. So would S. Korea,
Japan, and all of the middle east. Why the middle east? Because they stand to profit just as much as every other country. Currently many people are
finding that even obtaining a license or a passport (in the U.S. and the UK) has become increasingly difficult. The U.S. has already begun to
eliminate the "n'er do wells" and terrorism will phaze out as soon as the rest of the world is on board.
The infrastructure, the land, the services being provided by the entity stipulated, will still be available, but only to those who want to "work
it". This means it will take a massive amount of bodies to match the worlds demands, which are available in other countries being denied that
opportunity. Africa will have a chance to be as prosperous as the rest of the leading entities. Such as Zaire, Guatamala etc. The list goes on and
on.
As the world crumbles under economic collapse, can we really not lay this on the table, as war has proven to be the most effective means of economic
recovery?
Ponder it please.
