29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition

is this, YOUR pathetic attempt at logic?

"no squib remains"_javascript:icon('')

There is NO testing results to dismiss the claim of explosives...that is the ONLY way it can be dismissed, NOT by someone saying "they didn't want to waste the taxpayers money"...and YES...that is the reason NIST gave for NOT testing for explosives

I want my 20 million back

or maybe Giuliani should have shared his knowledge of the towers going to collapse, as his interview clearly states, when he was being evacuated, BEFORE the collapses

reply to post by 1SawSomeThings

---

And again, you are wrong. The "real" investigation started on the afternoon of 9/11/01. From the moment the airline tapes of the calls made by the flight attendants as to who the hijackers were, were played for law enforcement, the investigation was started. A few hours of computer work would link the names, tickets purchased and the means used to pay for said tickets. A few more hours of work would start turning up associates and other connections. A detailed investigation of the remains of the building wasn't necessary to figure out who had attacked us.

I am still waiting for a truther to define what a "real" investigation is.....

reply to post by 1SawSomeThings

---

You mean that you dont like that mechanical engineers shouldnt have been involved in investigating the collapse of a building? Thats an interesting viewpoint.

reply to post by hgfbob

---

If we were beyond that technology...it would have been in widespread use by the commercial demolition industry.