Nasa prepares to bomb the moon, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 69 times
Topic started on 18-6-2009 @ 08:19 AM by 0010110011101

Nasa prepares to bomb the moon


www.telegraph.co.uk
Nasa scientists are preparing to launch a space mission from Cape Canaveral carrying a missile that will fire a hole deep in the surface of the moon.
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.nasa.gov


reply posted on 18-6-2009 @ 08:30 AM by 0010110011101
reply to post by Kevin_X1



This has been in the pipeline for some time, it's not the first time I've heard of this. As far as I understand it they are going to fire a projectile into the moon, about the size of a washing machine, and then another craft will capute data of what is thrown out into the atmosphere.

Official story is that they want to test for water, although I'm not sure many on here will believe that! Either way, the launch is today so hold on to your hats, should be interesting to see what comes back!


reply posted on 18-6-2009 @ 08:42 AM by gallifreyan medic
reply to post by 0010110011101





a missile that will fire a hole deep in the surface of the moon.


Fire the writer of the article,the wording is terrible.

Hmm,thoughts of what happened to the moon in the remake of
The Time Machine.


reply posted on 18-6-2009 @ 08:44 AM by 0010110011101
reply to post by booda



There is. I provided a NASA link in the OP.

Info on timings, trajectory etc, should be on the NASA site, if not I will do some digging for you.


reply posted on 18-6-2009 @ 08:56 AM by libertytoall
This is a weapons test. The idea is to be able to fire long metal shards from orbit to hit any target on earth within 2 minutes.

Some info on the technology

The time between deorbiting and impact would only be a few minutes, and depending on the orbits and positions in the orbits, the system would have a world-wide range. There is no requirement to deploy missiles, aircraft or other vehicles. Although the SALT II (1979) prohibited the deployment of orbital weapons of mass destruction, it did not prohibit the deployment of conventional weapons.

The weapon inflicts damage because it moves at orbital velocities, at least 9 kilometers per second. The amount of energy released by the largest version when it hits the ground is roughly comparable to a small nuclear weapon or very large conventional bomb. Smaller weapons can deliver measured amounts of energy as small as a 500 lb conventional bomb.

The "pole" shape is optimal because it enhances reentry and maximizes the device's ability to penetrate hard or buried targets. The larger device is expected to be quite good at penetrating deeply buried bunkers and other command and control targets. The smaller "crowbar" size might be employed for anti-armor, anti-aircraft, anti-satellite and possibly anti-personnel use.

The weapon would be very hard to defend against. It has a very high closing velocity and a small radar cross-section. Launch is difficult to detect. Any infra-red launch signature occurs in orbit, at no fixed position. The infra-red launch signature also has a small magnitude compared to a ballistic missile launch. One drawback of the system is that the weapon's sensors would almost certainly be blind during atmospheric reentry due to the plasma sheath that would develop ahead of it, so a mobile target could be difficult to hit if it performed any unexpected maneuvering.

While the larger version might be individually launched, the smaller versions would be launched from "pods" or "carriers" that contained several missiles.

The phrase "Rods from God" is also used to describe the same concept.


[edit on 18-6-2009 by libertytoall]


reply posted on 18-6-2009 @ 08:57 AM by WendyHalo
We have been crashing things into the moon for a while. Here are a few links.

Take care,
Wendy


SMART-1 to Crash the Moon 08.30.2006
science.nasa.gov...

Spacecraft to Slam into the Moon By Leonard David Senior Space Writer
posted: 07 March 2006
www.space.com...

NASA Takes Aim at Moon with Double Sledgehammer By Jeremy Hsu
Staff Writer posted: 27 February 2008
www.space.com...

The crash of Lunar Prospector into the Moon did not liberate detectable signatures of water ice. Oct 1999
science.nasa.gov...


reply posted on 18-6-2009 @ 09:01 AM by 0010110011101
reply to post by WendyHalo



OK, I didnt know that this experiment had been done 3 times before. If NASA have slammed 3 different objects into the moon for this sort of test before, why are they doing it again?

Is the difference this time that we have something up there orbiting to take more accurate measurements or what?

Or is it simply a case of if at first you dont succeed, try, try, try and try again?!?!?!
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 5 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 7 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 18 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 6 days ago with 49 member flags