 |
reply posted on 27-5-2004 @ 08:30 PM by thematrix
|
CPU speed isn't needed really, just lots of ram.
I'm currently trying to see how If I can rerecord it as a I/O bitstream.
I slowed the thing down to be over 6 hours to hear the paterns better and see if there are underlying paterns.
I spent the first 5 years I was online using a analogue modem, and I'm very familiar with the audible sound of digital signals.
BTW, anyone know why the hell Aracebo is STILL down?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-5-2004 @ 09:30 PM by spwan
|
what if the US government has set up a secret socity on a distance planet already and are trying to communicate back about their progress.
- Spwan
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-5-2004 @ 12:12 AM by EmbryonicEssence
|
Spwan,
Very interesting thought. The question is, are they being helped (not human), or are they actually there on their own?
[Edited on 5-28-2004 by EmbryonicEssence]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-5-2004 @ 06:33 PM by Viendin
|
*Bump*
Sorry, I couldn't stand to see this sink beyond the horizon line yet..
Really nothing new? I could have been sure this was going somewhere..
And a note to anyone who wishes to slow down further than the 5782 area, using the 'Audio Recorder Program' that comes in pretty much any windows OS
and can be accessed through Start>Programs>Accessories>Entertainment>Audio Recording, or some name like that, you can select an option to 'delete all
information after this point', which will cut the 5782 seconds down to whatever point you are at. I took mine to 10 seconds, and then you can just
slow it down further.
Happy Hunting.. I hope we get some news someday..
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-5-2004 @ 07:02 PM by Mindsmog
|
I too would like to see if the experts have come to any conclusions?? or additional info/thoughts?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-5-2004 @ 07:13 PM by thematrix
|
I stretched it to be over 12 hours, It looks like there are at least 2 data streams, but only ONE data stream is audible, the other one is visible in
Audition, but out of human hearing range.
I'm first going to split them both up to audible ranges(to see if the 2nd range is also a datastream.) and then pass it trough some decoding software
to catch the raw data it seems to put out.
Its a pitty the wav file has 8-bit encoding though, who knows how much info is lost because of that :'(
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-5-2004 @ 12:50 PM by Sinobyte
|
Id be interested in hearing more about this as well. I wasn't ready to read through all 9 pages. I'd greatly appreciate some type of update on this
though.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-6-2004 @ 01:16 AM by antipigopolist
|
[edit on 20-10-2004 by antipigopolist]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-6-2004 @ 04:59 PM by sifr
|
SETI (the SETI Institute) would also have to ship equipment and personnel down to Arecibo and connect it to the telescope.
SETI@Home would have to switch from passive to active observation, for which the SERINDIP system isn't really equipped.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-6-2004 @ 02:01 PM by evilroadrage
|
Well....it's the 11th. One quick question for everybody? Has anybody gotten in touch with the original postee on this topic and ask him where he got
that sound, and if it's still going on?
That's All! Thank you.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-6-2004 @ 02:40 PM by pumpkyn
|
I am curious is there any correlation with this strong EM signal and the current volatile weather conditions that are being experienced around the
world?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-6-2004 @ 04:36 PM by 0951
|
Hmm, like others here, having messed about with the file for a bit, I'm tending to think it's got a terrestrial origin, and a somewhat mundane one
at that. The apparent RF signal strength is another factor in my thinking that too.
My SMP workstation is ‘electronically’ very noisy (RF noisy – quite aside from actually sitting next to it) – and I get artefacts from it’s harmonics
all over the place when I try to use my scanner when it’s on. Recordings from it have had a similar quality to this wav file.
Accepting that changing the wav file is probably more entertaining than it is useful … Spectrogram is good fun to mess about with (demo only, no
connection with company etc…) www.visualizationsoftware.com...
I came across the site during the Aphex Twin "Equation" malarkey, which was pretty cool too -
www.wired.com... .
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-6-2004 @ 10:09 AM by spangbr
|
the person who started this thread was banned for a hoax on the science board:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-6-2004 @ 11:07 AM by neonine
|
if i may be of any help just contact me
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-6-2004 @ 11:41 AM by minimi
|
Yeah - Is this just another Attention seeking Energy_wave thread?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |