It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Amagnon
Your idea of democracy exists NOWHERE in the world as a form of government for a nation - does that mean that there isn't a single democracy in the world?
Originally posted by Manouche
reply to post by jsobecky
It's a very dangerous path I think. Not the one I want to go by.
Originally posted by jsobecky
reply to post by Manouche
What is competency? Basic knowledge of the issues and the candidates' stances on the issues. Knowledge of the structure of gov't., etc.
Originally posted by Voxel
Originally posted by jsobecky
reply to post by Manouche
What is competency? Basic knowledge of the issues and the candidates' stances on the issues. Knowledge of the structure of gov't., etc.
You are dancing around the problem. What knowledge of what issues do you test for?
How can you test people on the basics of our form of government when the educational system has been corrupted so much that it purposefully hides the truth from the curious student?
Originally posted by Manouche
jsobecky,
"knowledge of the issues and the candidates' stances on the issues".
How do you measure that ? What is a satisfactory level of knowledge ? And who decides ?
Instead of coming up with an answer which is about punishing people because of their lack of knowledge, why don't we put our effort in educating people, inviting them to think, to contribute in a intelligent manner and developping our human civilisation ?
I know. It's far more difficult. What is worth is usually difficult.
What is our goal ? Castigate, polarize, divide, make guilty, dominate ?
Or improve our society, spread knowledge, education, enlightment ?
Originally posted by Manouche
reply to post by thisguyrighthere
If you are willing to be part of a fair civilian [civilized] society, you accept your views will sometimes be the majority or the minority. If you don't accept that, advocate a totalitarianism ruled by your group.
Originally posted by Alternative Thinker
If the voters where educated...
The test I was talking about was not meant to create eliteism but to force people to know why, they vote what they do
and I know that but it's a real flaw that the person or party with the most money to advertice, and the best karma when beeing taped is the ones who end up with the most power.
They all convert to "Catch 'em all" parties, and adjust their politics to whatever the majority of the voters want, not caring about their old ideologies.
Originally posted by Manouche
Instead of coming up with an answer which is about punishing people because of their lack of knowledge, why don't we put our effort in educating people, inviting them to think, to contribute in a intelligent manner and developping our human civilisation ?
Originally posted by jsobecky
reply to post by Voxel
Another excellent justification for a test. Voting should be a life skill, the same as balancing your checkbook or cooking. You cannot use a lousy education system as a reason not to strive for a better-educated voter. Maybe this would be a motivation to improve the failing education system.