The Government's Plan To Kill Independent Web Sites, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 169 times


reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 06:09 PM by Argyll
This system is being rolled out in the UK under the title "Phorm Scheme"

The House of Lords like it

Government advisors recognize the beneficial role that online advertising technologies like Phorm’s can have on the future of the internet.

blog.phorm.com...

However it seems that the majority of the public here in the UK definitely don't like it!!
it is the simple idea that a third party will be monitoring, even anonymously, where you go online that has spooked people. On the Virgin forums at cableforum.co.uk, 95% of those who answered a poll said they would opt out of the deal.

www.guardian.co.uk...



reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 06:32 PM by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by disgustedbyhumanity



Who do you think creates the majority of internet threats? I don't think its unemployed teenagers with a yale degree nor small marketing companies based in hong kong and singapore as microsoft will have you believe....hmmmm


reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 06:36 PM by PrisonerOfSociety
reply to post by Argyll



Good old Brown; first a NON-TRANSPARENT Iraq enquiry, when he said he would be more transparent and now he wants to charge all land-line owners in the UK, £6 per year so everyone gets broadband.

hmmm, i wonder why So they can bloody snoop even more. It's all starting to come together


reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 06:44 PM by mikerussellus
reply to post by mister.old.school




Interesting. Lets say they do pass this. What's to stop us from giving out of our own pocket to keep it (ATS) going? Or am I being too naive?


reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 08:12 PM by wylekat
reply to post by EvilAxis





The case was brought by The Times newspaper after it discovered the identity of a blogger in the police service who wrote the popular NightJack web page, which was awarded the Orwell Prize for political writing in April.


Sounds like someone didnt like the fact this person got an award- AND was probably printing the truth. I am so tired of people who tell the truth getting washed out by greed, power, and money. If the truth is to set you free- how come only liars are the free ones?


reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 09:06 PM by Genfinity
The people who want to "control" the internet........, I wish they were more concerned with controlling adult content and kiddie porn as opposed to be concerned about free speech!

Yet, we keep re-electing them. We have only ourselves to blame for this.

They cheat on their wives and we forgive it. Sex with boys? How about you taze him, hog tie him, and drag him into the wagon?

ENOUGH!

They want to take away our free speech while they cheat on their wives and take bail out payments under the table (you wonder why some of the companies "lost" their bail out money?).

I read an article today that the Pentagon has a test question about what low level terrorism is? Apparently, protesting is the answer. Not hate crimes. Who knew?

Our government is set up so that we can vote out these people. Let's start exercising that right before our elections look like something out of Iraq or Iran. Since 2000, we have been seeing signs of that already.

Still, we just type about it on the internet.

We need to make not voting uncool. Very uncool. Uncool like the KKK is uncool. Uncool like pedos are uncool.

If you don't vote, your more then uncool. Your scum. At the bottom of the bucket kind of scum.

We are letting DC take our country away from us.

Look at the Iranian protesters. Or how about the people who sacrificed themselves in China (Tee-en-eh-men Square).

People in China and Iran care more about freedom then we do. No wonder they hate us. They are right when they say we are lazy.

VOTE! Everybody. Not just every four years. When ever there is an election, no matter how minor, lose the remote and go vote.

Step away from the key board. Go vote.

Am I still on thread? Maybe I should make my own topic.

Go vote these people out before they make your vote not count.

They want to take away our right to free speech? We'll take away their right to be in DC.

If you want to be cool, go vote.


reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 10:12 PM by schrodingers dog
reply to post by mister.old.school



m.o.s., like I pointed out on my opening post there are, from a CT point of view, two seemingly divergent priorities to be reconciled within this discussion.

There ARE valid privacy concerns on the internet, some of which ARE related to "cookie" protocols. But there also is the valid concerns raised within your OP.

In essence it's almost like they're putting us in a position to choose which devil we want ...

Do we protect ourselves from the "bogeyman" spying on us at the expense of free expression or vice versa.

This is of course a contrived false choice. The reality is, as I have already pointed out, that there is already technology available to protect ourselves and our privacy without government intervention.

Also I think this legislation may be a last desperate measure from those who have all but lost the control they used to exert.

[edit on 17 Jun 2009 by schrodingers dog]


reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 10:38 PM by golemina
reply to post by mister.old.school



Great thread Op!.


From what I had already known, combined with my research on this thread, there appears to be little to fear, and no provable harm to have come from behavior-targeted banner advertising. Each "third party" advertising network I researched makes it very clear they care nothing for your name and personal details, they simply attempt to learn about what you like -- "you" being a disassociated numeric identifier -- to give you more relevant advertisements.

The cookie, in this case, contains that disassociated numeric identifier that relates to a series of collected data on the servers of the advertising networks. There's nothing personal.


Gotta call BS on this though...

You don't REALLY believe in this so-called 'benign' nature of these cookies do you?

Similarly, you don't REALLY believe you have ANY actual privacy on the Internet, do you?


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



A MUST Read, "Written By A Female Cop"
  Posted 1 days ago with 33 member flags
Know your enemy ... the Daily Mail & Viscount Rothermere
  Posted 11 days ago with 17 member flags
NBC and the Banned \'Fear Factor\' Episode
  Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags
What are Seventh-day Adventists (SDAs) REALLY like?
  Posted 11 days ago with 5 member flags