posted on Jun, 17 2009 @ 02:47 AM
ok - as " time wave zero " seems to be the latest ` big stir ` in the 2012 cult - it is prudent to have a closer look at just how 2012 and TWZ
became intertwined
the answer ?
its a arbitrary " correlation " decided on a whim by the creators of the ` program ` -
read the creators own admission
here
the time wave is zero at only one point , when x=0 . for x> 0 the value of the wave is positive , the zero point is the point in time
CHOSEN to correspond to the value zero for x , the usual point used is 6 am on December 21st 2012 ( known as the zero date ) thus the time
wave has a positive value for all points prior to the zero date , is zero only at the zero point and is undefined after the zero point
rather than being the ` end point ` 2012 is actually the START of the TWZ process
so its utter dishonesty to set a capricious start date - for a sequence that infact works back wards
then turn around and claim that it actually " runs " forwards - and that there is some significance to the 2012 ` end point `
the math of TWZ is actually quite revealing once you peer past the hype –
the simple summary is that you start with a series of numbers – and run them through a repetitive equation
that’s it – all there is to it
the resultant graph looks pretty and has recurring patterns – but they mean nothing , because its simply a recursive sequence – its INTENDED TO BE
THAT WAY – USING THE SAME NUMBERS AND SAME EQUATRION – YOU CANNOT GET ANYTHING ELSE
even the ` starting data ` is arbitrary – you could use ANY set of numbers – and you would get a similar graph – from the same equations and yes
it would have recurring patterns too and if you set the y axis of the graph to an arbitrary calendar – it produces ` resonances ` if you cherry pick
events
and all ` correlations ` of events are simply forced fit patter finding – any even that ` matches ` a date is used – however vague or tenuous the
` connection `
and anything that doesn’t match is ignored
the entire ` science ` of it is UTTER TWADDLE – they started off with a conclusion , and manufactured the data to ` prove ` the claim true .
and now there is thread after thread on ATS