reply to post by silo13
I understood it as a contradiction over the behavior of pedophiles who couldn’t control their compulsions vs. couldn’t or wouldn’t control the
behavior stemming from the compulsion.
If you desire something you know is wrong, harmful, or immoral, there are steps you can take to mitigate your urges. You can make yourself avoid
situations you know accommodate the things you desire, you can exert sheer willpower, and you can strike a balance of consciously change your
lifestyle to accommodate your level of personal willpower. It takes responsibility and knowing yourself... knowing your limitations, an seeking help
or counseling or hospitalization if you find you cannot resist them.
I
really loath this word in this context.... but even in a "crime of passion" where the urge overcomes their reasoning, they are still
responsible for their actions - because they KNOW they are a pedophile, and they know how strong those urges are, and they didn't take adequate
measures to prevent them.
This doesn't mean that they can help being a pedophile though. There's a great many pedophiles out there who have never touched a child sexually,
who would commit suicide before allowing themselves to do it... though they've fantasized, RPd, or drew art about it. A great many who suffer with
this struggle - and they prevent their urges from harming others. Some of which their family or friends might not even know who they are, they've
learned to suppress it so well.
That's why I make a clear distinction, and why I am adverse to "kill em all" banter. Because while I recognize that something must be done to
protect children from the unrepentant and proud pedophiles you mentioned to another poster... I just can't justify the mistreatment of those who do
recognize the harm in pedophilia, and take the difficult steps to keep it within the realm of fantasy only.
It's all too easy for heated emotions and bigoted rhetoric to get out of control and hurt those who are only guilty of having the misfortune of being
born the way they are.
Ok I want to avoid mixing apples and oranges here so Ill bypass the cannibalism reference
I only offered it because it seemed a fairly substantial (for a niche) fetish concerning a similarly (or as best I could find) extreme taboo.
I most definitely would (if I had the right to make the law) persecute those same people, with death, if they acted on their *compulsions* and raped a
child.
You don't have to address the point if you don't want to, but for other's reading, the factors behind what determine human sexuality are extremely
varied and diverse - ranging from genetic, developmental, and environmental - most profoundly at a young age, but can be acquired later in life as
well. As a fetish community when they started having an affinity for their fetish and you'll get a wide range of answers - with a majority typically
leaning between early childhood and puberty. So it's perhaps a misnomer to consider pedophilia a "fetish". It is for some, but for others (as
mentioned by another poster earlier) it's more of an orientation with clear and consistent brain structure differences that aren't present or as
pronounced with "fetish pedos". Some are "born with it", and some aren't.
As for the text I quoted... I certainly sympathize with the sentiment, but considering how many innocent people have been released from death row over
the last 10 years, and how many are pending retrials in light of new evidence... I can see a lot of innocent people getting caught up and killed in
the fervor. Be they pedophiles who have never, or would ever, harm a child - or some poor SOB who got way too drunk one night and had his girlfriends
daughter crawl into bed with him either out of revenge or spite or "love" or whatever. Perhaps it could be a setup by one partner as a ways of
gaining leverage in a messy divorce.
That kind of stuff happens quite regularly. My sister's ex is now a convicted pedophile because her daughter from a previous boyfriend (at a very
young age) happened to say some things which his parents interpreted as "molestation" - and they sent her to a specialist who pretty much goaded the
kid into saying what they wanted her to say. She was just happy for attention. It was enough to build a case, and get him convicted. Though it was
eventually overturned... his reputation and life is ruined... and he'd be dead now between a one strike rule and the impassioned unthinking
vigilantism which seems to be displayed here.
I don't think execution is a viable across the board policy, especially not the first strike, and certainly not hasted and fueled by hate-filled
righteousness the kinds of attitudes some have displayed here.
If you’re convicted of an act of pedophilia - you’re a pedophile. Sorry, there’s no *let me try it just once to find out* clause in my book.
I understand what you're getting at, but understand where I'm coming from. By the same token, and for argument's sake, if you're male and enjoy
getting pegged by a guy once in a while, that doesn't necessarily make you gay. Gay men are attracted sexually to males. You can be totally straight
and be unattracted to other men - yet still enjoy being dominated and submitted by "the real thing". Perhaps you have a thing for humiliation, and
the more unttracted you are - the hotter it is for you. Perhaps you just enjoy the sensation, and tolerate the guy for the pleasure of your
partner.
Human sexuality is extremely diverse - and subtle differences can make worlds of difference. For example, homosexuals, transsexuals, and transvestites
are NOT the same - thought they're all lumped together because most people don't take the time to see beyond "WUT? peenor goes where!?"
It's the same with pedophilia. Now if someone rapes an 8 year old kid, they SHOULD be charged with pedophilia... but that doesn't necessarily mean
that they are sexually attracted to children. They might just be a rapist, who are often motivated by domination and power, and a rape would have
occurred whether the victim be 8 years old, 28, or 78.
While it would certainly feel righteous to agree that the punishment should be the same regardless - there has to be some progress made towards
understanding and differentiating between these sexual motivations, finding the root causes of them, and applying justice appropriately and
rationally.
I can assure you, the *just once* argument makes no difference at all to a child who's been raped.
Regardless, it's better to try to recognize the differences in motivation, the difference between an act of pedophilia - and a pedophile - and try to
understand why these people are the way they are. They're not going to go away on their own, and the best shot we have at preventing future incidence
is through understanding. Power comes from knowledge, not the executioners axe. By painting all acts of pedophilia with the same broad stroke of
social labeling and punishment - we're merely obscuring the roots of the different sexual motivations - ensuring it's perpetuation, rather than
perhaps working on models for preventative measures.
... and you can't change who someone is by threat of death.
But, in saying that I respect your right to your opinion
Likewise.
Never deny your fellow man the right to their opinion, for it ultimately enslaves you to your own opinions by preventing you from changing them... to
paraphrase Paine.
but in possession of ~ an open mind.
Hah... I believe that is perhaps the first time on ATS I have ever been accused of having an open mind.