reply to post by silo13
That's not a contradiction. That's a distinction between punishment for an action taken, and a punishment levied for the way you were born/developed
- which is out of your control. It was a distinction I had hoped to make clear - because some people often can't tell the difference between someone
who's turned on by children, and someone who rapes children. While I personally agree that either form is grotesque in the highest degree, I cannot
justify the persecution of someone for being born a certain way. Just like I find the act of cannibalism grotesque, I cannot justify the
criminalization of someone behind their desk gettin it on to a fantasy picture - even if I also think Dahlmer got off easy with bludgeoning death for
his crimes. (It should be noted he had severe mental issues. I believe it was reported that he got sexual gratification from his cannibalism, but it
wasn't quite like a purely sexual fetish)
I don't have the statistics on hand, and I'd be much obliged if anyone feels like posting them - be they contradictory or confirming - but as I
understand it, a large portion of the people convicted of pedophilia aren't really even pedophiles. They're adventure seekers, experimenters, etc.
Many men experiment with homosexuality, though they are not homosexual themselves. Some are caught within rules - such as the poster above regarding
the Arizona case where the sexual contact was consensual between persons of similar age - but outside of existing laws.
The issue is complex. It's not cut & dry, and cut & dry solutions aren't working. They won't work. Replacing a current cut & dry policy with a new
(and more brutal) cut & dry policy isn't going to work either - and may make the situation even worse.
Because yeah... we've seen how well crackdowns and mandatory minimums other unrealistic, unjust, and oversimplified stuff works with the War on
Drugs... having unforeseen consequences down the road, such as wasted tax dollars, dirtier drugs, terrorism funding... etc... amirite?




