Cheney tied to theft and possible murder, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 69 times


reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 11:12 AM by jd140
reply to post by dariousg



1.We don't use the term GI anymore.

2. We are called soldiers, marines, etc

3. We are as much American Citazens as anybody else. Some in my opinion are more worthy of that term then you or me.



reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 11:58 AM by antar
reply to post by neil a



Yes, even after reading the links posted I still do not see this as anything which could be considered more than a quagmire of deflection for other more impressive situations yet to be discovered by the GP.

Mr C. does NOT deal in the lowly world of cash as we know it. If he is above anything it is the false flag of monetary cash flow and stagnation.

This man deals in Power not petty cash theft.

The bones were thrown to the loyal.


reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 12:00 PM by PINDARFOX12
reply to post by neil a



this is not surprising to me at all.



reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 12:10 PM by grapesofraft
reply to post by PINDARFOX12



Well of course not, because people like you think that Dick Cheney is the devil. If I created a thread that said Dick Cheney decapitated his wife and ate her brain you would believe it.

All the guy has done is serve the country for most of his life. Then he gets blamed for 911 when their is no proof he had a hand in any of it. Name one thing that links him to being behind 911 or anything else that is criminal.


reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 12:13 PM by jd140
reply to post by grapesofraft



Dude, you are about to get 99% of the ATS members flaming you. Back up know and choose your fights carefully.

Right now they are calling each other on the phone and are about to suffocate you with a virtual dog pile.

Edit while you still can.


reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 12:16 PM by grapesofraft
reply to post by jd140



LOL, well it will give them something to do for the day. You know they need a good enemy to beat up on or they are not happy.

It just gets under my skin that people believe anything bad they hear about Cheney or Bush without any proof other than some guy said it was true.

How would they like it if I said something bad about them and everyone believed it without evidence?

Anyway, thanks for the warning. Just think how many points that will rack up for the OP, maybe he will stop to thank me.

[edit on 17-6-2009 by grapesofraft]


reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 12:18 PM by Hefficide
reply to post by grapesofraft



Just for the record I never said that Dick Cheney was the devil.

I did imply that the devil has to wear sunglasses over the weekend to hide the black eye that Dick gave him during one of their many lovers spats.

I am actually impressed. I don't think I've ever really seen anyone defend Cheney before.

He's a bad man. He's a greedy man. I would say that he's got so many skeletons in his closet that the Smithsonian calls him when they need spare parts for their collection.

yeah.


reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 12:25 PM by grapesofraft
Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to
post by grapesofraft



Just for the record I never said that Dick Cheney was the devil.

I did imply that the devil has to wear sunglasses over the weekend to hide the black eye that Dick gave him during one of their many lovers spats.

I am actually impressed. I don't think I've ever really seen anyone defend Cheney before.

He's a bad man. He's a greedy man. I would say that he's got so many skeletons in his closet that the Smithsonian calls him when they need spare parts for their collection.

yeah.


LOL, liked the devil joke. Nice one. Kind of reminds me with the South Park with the devil and Sadaam.

You can say he is a bad and greedy man, but it is just an opinion. There is no proof that he is either, other than a bunch of people blamining him for things that they had no proof that it happened that way or that it happened at all.

I could say bad stuff about anybody, but it doesnt make it true.

[edit on 17-6-2009 by grapesofraft]


reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 12:30 PM by Hefficide
reply to post by grapesofraft



And thanks to things being classified and some executive orders we will probably never know exactly what Dick was or was not guilty of. But in a court, with reasonable doubt as standard? I don't think he'd see a conflict of interest or even a crimes against humanity trial as a walk in the park (assuming a level playing field for the court proceedings).



reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 12:37 PM by grapesofraft
reply to post by Hefficide



Well if anything, the playing field would be tilted against Cheney, because the Congress and President are Dems.

The thing is they cannot take him down for "torture" because obviously Pelosi did not see it as torture when she was breifed on it. So if he is guilty then she is an accessory to the crime.


reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 12:38 PM by Hefficide
reply to post by grapesofraft



Granted. We'd gut our own government if we were to pursue Iraq based convictions.

But still, the whole point of this thread, in a way, was to show that Cheney is above the law. We've just proven that regarding one issue.


reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 12:42 PM by grapesofraft
reply to post by Hefficide



This whole thread is just about throwing around some wild, unsubstantiated accusations against Cheney without any proof whatsoever. If there is one shred of proof that the OP is correct anywhere in this thread then point it out to me.

Also, we did not just prove Cheney is above the law. We proved that the Dems will not hang one of their own out to dry in order to pursue the matter. I personally think if there was a trial he would be found not guilty.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^