ABC turns programming over to Obama; news to be anchored from inside the White House, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 62 times
Topic started on 16-6-2009 @ 08:05 AM by bakednutz

ABC turns programming over to Obama; news to be anchored from inside the White House


drudgereport.com
On the night of June 24, the media and government become one, when ABC turns its programming over to President Obama and White House officials to push government run health care -- a move that has ignited an ethical firestorm!

Highlights on the agenda:

ABCNEWS anchor Charlie Gibson will deliver WORLD NEWS from the Blue Room of the White House.

The network plans a primetime special -- 'Prescription for America' -- originating from the East Room, exclude opposing voices on the debate.
(visit the link for the full news article)

Mod Edit: Removed all caps.

[edit on 16-6-2009 by Gemwolf]












UPDATE:

ABCNEWS Senior Vice President Kerry Smith on Tuesday responded to the RNC complaint, saying it contained 'false premises':

"ABCNEWS prides itself on covering all sides of important issues and asking direct questions of all newsmakers -- of all political persuasions -- even when others have taken a more partisan approach and even in the face of criticism from extremes on both ends of the political spectrum. ABCNEWS is looking for the most thoughtful and diverse voices on this issue.

"ABCNEWS alone will select those who will be in the audience asking questions of the president. Like any programs we broadcast, ABC News will have complete editorial control. To suggest otherwise is quite unfair to both our journalists and our audience."


[edit on 16-6-2009 by bakednutz]


reply posted on 16-6-2009 @ 08:06 AM by MOFreemason



reply posted on 16-6-2009 @ 08:19 AM by Gemwolf
reply to post by MOFreemason



The general rule is that 1 News (BAN) thread is allowed and one discussion is allowed in the general forums about the same topic (If it's alternative news).

[edit on 16-6-2009 by Gemwolf]


reply posted on 16-6-2009 @ 08:26 AM by Sky watcher
reply to post by bakednutz



First they shut down profitable Republican auto dealerships country wide. Only one is owned by a Democrat for looks. Now we have this. Obama is the Anti-Christ and Acorn is his army.

When will America wake up and stop this?


reply posted on 16-6-2009 @ 08:46 AM by 0nce 0nce
reply to post by Sky watcher



I just woke up...

I read one word wrong. It says "the media and government becOme one", and read "the media and government becAme one". Big difference.


reply posted on 16-6-2009 @ 09:12 AM by Sky watcher
Originally posted by 0nce 0nce
reply to
post by Sky watcher



I just woke up...

I read one word wrong. It says "the media and government becOme one", and read "the media and government becAme one". Big difference.


ya me too. I know that we all want good cheap health care but regulating the cost is the way, not to completely let the government run it. The government screws everything up.

Not to mention they have no money for it so we are going to be taxed up the wazzu to fund it. People who have money would be taxed big time to pay for illegals health care. Hospitals are already over ran with them now. I know, My fiancées a nurse at a major hospital. The Mexicans are flooding the place, especially with new born baby's.

I know that I don't want to be paying for them.


reply posted on 16-6-2009 @ 09:23 AM by bakednutz
reply to post by 0nce 0nce



I think your wrong about health insurance companies being the only ones who care. Do you realize what it will cost the American taxpayer to do this? I think the majority of the American people oppose, or would oppose this if they knew the true cost, and the impact it would have on the quality of health care a pt receives. Do you want your healthcare rationed like all of the other socialized healthcare systems around the world? And dont let Obama fool you by telling you it is not socilaized medicine because that is exactly what it is. If Obama did not want to decieve the American people this would not be happening or they would allow opposing view points during this broadcast with an equal amount of time.

Main Stream Media- Is it the next industry to receive government bailout money? Then Obama would have his wish, control everything and everyone.


reply posted on 16-6-2009 @ 09:27 AM by centurion1211
Originally posted by 0nce 0nce
-post removed-

Oops, never mind, I read the original news story wrong.

-added

I personally wouldn't mind a government run health care. Actually, I think the only people that really care are health insurance companies who fear they will have major competition. It will put a lot of health care insurance companies out of business, but I'm pretty certain it wont put ALL of them out of business.

[edit on 16-6-2009 by 0nce 0nce]




In answer to this naive viewpoint, let me re-state what should be the obvious.

You think you want government run healthcare? Want to see a preview of what it would be like? You could go to Canada and watch them ship a lot of their cases down to the U.S. since they can't get timely care there, especially for time critical cases.

Don't feel like making a tip to Canada, then go visit your local DMV, or any other government office that deals with the public. There you will see the tax-paid employees slowly shuffling around while trying to do the least work possible in an 8 hour day. I work for one of the states and I see it every day.

Want people like that making life and death decisions for you or your loved ones? That's exactly what you'll get with government healthcare.



Now back to the OP, to me this is the worst sign of all of what's been going since obama assumed the throne. The news media is supposed to be the watchdog for all of us over government. When they join hands like this, how will any of us have a chance to know the truth?

Just remember as you watch this all unfold. It isn't Republicans taking your rights and freedoms. It is the democrats using the "mandate" many of you so blindly gave them because you (thought you) wanted change.



[edit on 6/16/2009 by centurion1211]


reply posted on 16-6-2009 @ 09:31 AM by bakednutz
reply to post by centurion1211



Funny, your exactly right about government anything. I work for a state government as well and everyone does as little as possible, just enough to get by. Healthcare run by the government would suck at best, kind of like going to a vet to get your checkup or your surgery or any healthcare needs taken care of.

[edit on 16-6-2009 by bakednutz]


reply posted on 16-6-2009 @ 10:30 AM by 0nce 0nce
Originally posted by centurion1211
In answer to this naive viewpoint, let me re-state what should be the obvious.


Thanks for insulting me and my opinion, I appreciate it.

Now let me answer to your idiotic viewpoint;

"Health care" means "health insurance" it does not mean that every hospital is going to be run by the government, it means people will not be left for dead just because they can't afford help. The private sector would still exist, it will just have help from the government.

I'm not a greedy scumbag, I am willing to be taxed to help people who need help. If you saw someone get in an accident, would you help them? If you found out they were an illegal immigrant and or couldn't afford your help, would you still help them? I would.

A government assisted health care system would actually lower health care costs FOR ALL OF US. For example; If someone got in an accident and an ambulance arrives to take them to the hospital, they will end up having to pay hundreds of dollars for that ambulance ride. People without insurance or a way to pay for that ride will force the hospitals to tax SOMEBODY. That is why the cost for an ambulance ride costs so much, there are so many people who can't afford it, or without insurance, that the price gets raised so that the people who actually can afford it, or have insurance, will be able to make up for the difference.

We are already getting taxed for other peoples health problems through high health care costs. High health care costs are a disguise to pay for other people's bills. A government health care would lower costs for health care because they wouldn't be forcing people who can afford it, to make up the difference. It takes a brain to understand that so I don't expect everyone to "get it".

Basically what I am saying is, we already pay for other peoples health care bills. Heath care costs so much because that is how they pay the bills for people who can't. A government health care system will force everyone to "pitch in" through taxes, to pay the bills. That means people who need health care more than others won't be forced to pay more to cover the costs for other's, and it means health care will be less expensive over all because they will no longer need to raise costs to pay for others. It's all linked together.





[edit on 16-6-2009 by 0nce 0nce]



reply posted on 16-6-2009 @ 10:40 AM by Digital_Reality
reply to post by centurion1211



You don't have to go to Canada. You can look right here in the good Ole USA at Medicaid and military healthcare.

I'm not sure what makes them think if they cant handle it on a small scale that they do a better job on a larger scale.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 5 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 6 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 17 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 14 hours ago, 68 replies