It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Ok get your tomatoes ready...
Originally posted by Tgautier13
reply to post by xxshadowfaxx
Well I'm glad you weren't following the Timewave around the time of the 2008 crash, or you would've already made up your mind a year and a half ago...
Originally posted by epsilon69
reply to post by Wobbly Anomaly
Maybe because the moon landing was a hoax. All the evidence points toward it.
Originally posted by Zagari
The start date is determined by August 6/9 1945...That was clearly the most novel day in history we know because its the point from which we discover we can destroy ourselves...
Originally posted by memarf1
reply to post by Lil Drummerboy
Also, we must remember that whatever happens July 11 may not be visible to any of us right away. It could be as simple as an irreversible decision somebody makes which drives the wave downward to the August 11 novelty date. July 11 is the beginning of a downward trend that will last exactly 1 month. So, like me, if you are going to give up on TW0 then at least wait to see what will become painfully apparent over the course of the next month, not just the beginning date. The things that will come to pass will be obvious by August 11 and probably far sooner. However, they may not manifest directly in our faces or MSM until a few days or a couple of weeks after the July 11 date.
I cannot emphasize enough, that date is the beginning of something irreversible and can be as simple as someone giving a command to do something that spirals us down that 1 month trend. You must give the entire drop a chance, not just the start of that drop. This is also my argument against shifting the graph to make it work by the way. We do not know exactly what goes on behind the scenes and just b/c we perceive something as important, the actual event may have occurred much sooner and if we knew about i twe could correspond the graph to it without shifting.
I am an amateur to this, but I am a Physicist and know a little about statistics and mathematical manipulation. That is why I have a problem with shifting the TW0.
Originally posted by Wobbly Anomaly
Would it not make sense to create a graph of novel events (not a timewave graph) one which shows events from history that we can (hopefully) agree were novel. The more novel we think they were, the bigger dip we draw.
There is enough reasonably accurate recorded history to do this and we should, in theory, finish up with something that looks like the timewave. Once we have this with, for example, 100 novel dips we can then see if our 'real' graph of events correlates with what the timewave is showing us.
Personally speaking a long list of dates is hard to visualise and certainly future dates are even more abstract. I'd really like to see a 'real' graph of agreed novel events over layed on top the timewave.
Originally posted by ZagariI believe I understood your point but you have to consider that this action wouldn't bring to a satisfying conclusion, that's my opinion.