Timewave Zero - Countdown to Transition, page 231


Pages: <<  228    229    230    231    232  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 568 times


reply posted on 27-1-2013 @ 03:39 AM by Zagari
reply to post by Kitora



it is business that makes it continue...The date has no meaning whatsoever. I asked for the reason but they say it is anyone's guess, another word for, " We invented it " .


reply posted on 28-1-2013 @ 04:49 PM by Wulfric



reply posted on 30-1-2013 @ 08:47 AM by Zagari
reply to post by Wulfric



So, there are many alternatives proposed, such as the third one, that 9/11 was the zero date...Interesting but not very original. Oh, they say July 8 2018 is because of 9/11...
edit on 30-1-2013 by Zagari because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 5-2-2013 @ 06:21 PM by Zagari
Timewave in itself, the design of it, with no dates attached to it, is true. It is the very real design of time. We now know about the design of time, that time is fractal, that events are connected by a 64 day phenomenon, but we cannot attach the correct dates to it.
All about the Eschaton and the philosophy of Mckenna is true, and we will , we WILL see the Eschaton one day, probably in the next 6 years, anytime by now.

Its like an eruption, that we expect, but we cannot anticipate, because as of now, events are not very intense and rapid, there is still a lot of habit. But when events will become more and more intense, we will experience the birth of a new phenomenon, the Eschaton.

We should continue listening to Mckenna 's videos. They still talk about a future we will see, that this generation will certainly see, and soon, not late in the century.

My research officially never stopped. I am still analizing repetitions and resoances in time and history.
I am still using the 64 days phenomenon, where big events are supposedly distanced from each other by 64 dates. Its like a re-charge time, or for novelty jumps, a charge time.

I still think timewave is true, we simply do not know much about it anymore. Its all back to scrap now.

We should at least continue to watch for resonances, because the cycle is not broken yet, we are still inside a timewave, inside Evasius's train ( see earlier posts in this thread ), we are still sitting in the train, on a ride to the unknown, we do not know when we will arrive to destination. But there IS a destination for history and this is what we should understand and remember.


reply posted on 5-2-2013 @ 06:28 PM by unityemissions
reply to post by Zagari



IF you attach no dates onto it, it's meaningless. There is no context to link it to space-time, so what's the point? There is none.

I would generally agree that we'll see some incredible changes within the next six years. We must. I think we've already fallen off the "climate cliff" and will have to introduce some radical innovations in order to find a habitable landing.

I don't think this has anything to do with the timewave. The fractal is beyond our comprehension.
edit on 5-2-2013 by unityemissions because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 5-2-2013 @ 11:34 PM by AceWombat04
reply to post by Zagari



In my opinion, the entire basis of McKenna's theory, the very premise on which the 64 day cycles were predicated, led inexorably to the 2012 date being the singularity. He quite adamantly asserted this many times. That did not happen as described within any context McKenna or others who embraced his theory expounded upon. Thus, the entire theory unravels. TimeWave has been debunked quite satisfactorily by this topic and the failure of the date to produce anything in my opinion.

Saying that the underlying premise is true without any evidence of that premise being the reality (because the basis of such evidence was the 64 day cycles and resonant events leading toward the singularity on the prescribed date, not some future, unknowable point in time,) would be an example of moving the goal posts and cognitive dissonance on my part in my view.

Is it possible that something like TW is true and somehow underpins the nature of time and that McKenna perceived some facet thereof, just imprecisely? Perhaps. I am open to that possibility. However, that moves into amorphous, pliable territory that we can easily shape into anything we want without the ability to prove or test it, and thus believing that it is or must be the reality because of an unwillingness to acknowledge the failure of McKenna's theory as described by him is, for me, a self deluding trap I am not inclined to fall into.

You have the right to your beliefs however, of course, and I respect them.

Peace.
edit on 2/5/2013 by AceWombat04 because: Typos



reply posted on 10-2-2013 @ 01:07 PM by AdAstra
reply to post by Zagari



I just noticed in another thread that last year you said February 23, 2013 was "the real end date".
How do you feel about it now?

www.abovetopsecret.com...
Pages: <<  228    229    230    231    232  >>    ^^TOP^^



Pane andov - expected cosmic events in 2012-2013
  Posted 8 days ago with 9 member flags
Near Earth Asteroid Sept 14 2012
  Posted 6 days ago with 8 member flags
Let\'s take a look at the PoleShift/PlanetX doomsayers, shall we?
  Posted 19 days ago with 7 member flags
2012 Is not the End.
  Posted 3 days ago with 4 member flags