Has anyone come up with the software version that has the vetted algorithms? Without knowing that, and which version of the software you are using, this toy is of much less value...as the toy it is.

Originally posted by PeaNice
I couldn't find anywhere on the website which version is used. I am sending an email to the "contact" whoever that might be to find out. Until then, the website is worthless.

Webware unless it is from a highly trusted source is crapware. A user has no idea what software is running "beneath the site" and there is no trusted source for any of McKenna's software so my contact is moot.

But at least I made the effort.

What software are you using?

Originally posted by RongoRongo

Originally posted by PeaNice
I couldn't find anywhere on the website which version is used. I am sending an email to the "contact" whoever that might be to find out. Until then, the website is worthless.

Webware unless it is from a highly trusted source is crapware. A user has no idea what software is running "beneath the site" and there is no trusted source for any of McKenna's software so my contact is moot.

But at least I made the effort.

What software are you using?

I bought my copy and use it for cheap thrills locally. It's great for party games. I was told in an email by Shuldrake that the copy I have has the corrected algorithm, he thinks, but has never received any confirmation that his corrected mathematics was {properly} implemented...or implemented at all.

The entire thing is part joke and part calamity and part scam but as I have said before, it makes for fun when everyone is drink and wants to "predict the future".

Originally posted by 08051962

What does that even mean?? "it has the bad version of the program"... what is "it"? And which version do you speak of?

No one knows for sure, that is the point I am making.

Originally posted by 08051962
Is this your way of saying: Timewave Zero isn't real and I don't believe in it?

I don't know what you do or do not believe an yes, I am saying that the TW theorem is proven many, many times, - see this thread - as crap.

The software, well, what difference does it make unless you want to be sure you are not made smelly funsies of at your party where you whip out this McKenna sham.

Originally posted by PeaNice

I bought my copy and use it for cheap thrills locally. It's great for party games. I was told in an email by Shuldrake that the copy I have has the corrected algorithm, he thinks, but has never received any confirmation that his corrected mathematics was {properly} implemented...or implemented at all.

The entire thing is part joke and part calamity and part scam but as I have said before, it makes for fun when everyone is drink and wants to "predict the future".

If you bought a copy then you are getting updates and notices and other contact so what does the author say?

Originally posted by RongoRongo

Originally posted by PeaNice

I bought my copy and use it for cheap thrills locally. It's great for party games. I was told in an email by Shuldrake that the copy I have has the corrected algorithm, he thinks, but has never received any confirmation that his corrected mathematics was {properly} implemented...or implemented at all.

The entire thing is part joke and part calamity and part scam but as I have said before, it makes for fun when everyone is drink and wants to "predict the future".

If you bought a copy then you are getting updates and notices and other contact so what does the author say?

I wish. You confuse professional software developers with McKenna who had no idea what he was doing and the moron he tricked - no pay then McKenna croaked - into developing the software.

And no one knows who wrote the algorithm although it has been alluded that it was "formulated by a supercomputer".

GIGO.

People are freaking me out, you should thank me, greatly thank me for the contribution in this thread. I dedicated a big part of my life these years in the posting of information FOR ALL OF YOU.
Evasius too was starting his threads with historical resonances.
I am one of the top 5 contributors in this thread. All my work is for you guys. But it seems never enough, we get overwhelmed by newcomers and my contribution goes by ignored.
I'm not satisfied with Evasius philosophical speeches and consciousness theories.
You guys don't know what Mckenna intended to be it, maybe its Evasius way of doing that was incomplete.
I was showing you how history repeats itself.
You guys are a delusion for me. I expected more support and more contribution.