It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
also, if you truly believe Osama was not behind the attacks on 9/11....then you're living in a little tiny hole...with tin foil on your head.
Religious extremists attacked us on September 11th, 2001.
Stop thinking the government was behind it.
Yes, Bush was fully aware of the attacks.
The man that f'd up Iraq carried out the largest attack on the US in ...history? Think again...please...THINK.
Originally posted by Sevrens83
Honestly, I believe this thread is more about the psychology of the human mind rather than part of the 9/11 conspiracy. But then again, all conspiracies are closely related to psychology.
Maybe the ACLU should be assigned to head the new independent 911 investigation?
Originally posted by SPreston
Come on Dave. Everybody knows that Al Jazeera is a CIA mouth organ half-filled with former BBC journalists. Why else did they come out with pronouncements and videos and audios exactly when Dubya got himself in trouble and needed them most?
Osama has been dead since December 2001 and you know it, and the Bush Regime knew it. They never went after Osama because it is a waste of time and manpower to chase after a dead man who could be buried anywhere.
Originally posted by impressme
How about posting some sources instead of your rants and un informed information.
I hate to be the one to tell you but you are WRONG!
With an ego the size of Mount Everest, Osama bin Laden would not have, could not have, remained silent for so long if he were still alive. He always liked to take credit even for things he had nothing to do with. Would he remain silent for nine months and not trumpet his own survival? [New York Times. July 11, 2002]
I don’t need to be entertained by lies, and stop referring all 911 truths come from self serving con artists, selling T-shirts. Where do you get this garbage?
Another lie that was told to you and you did not bother researching the truth.You should stop watching to much Fox News, they are the biggest lying propagandas network in existence.
Only you make that assumptions no one else has. Where is the logic in that?
No need to curse. Only the disinfo web sites have it wrong.
Originally posted by jprophet420
Whenever people claim that the conspiracy is too big to cover up, I love to bring up the Manhattan project and Pearl harbor. 2 known coverups that involved thousands upon thousands of people.
Originally posted by twitchy
Can you or anyone please explain the above image Dave?
...and whenever they bring THOSE up, I remind them that the coverups was immediately and glaringly obvious to anyone and everyone, including the people who were involved in the hands-on work to get the project going.
According to French intelligence sources, Bin Laden ALSO died in 2006 from Typhus. How could he have died in 2006 if he died in 2001?
Dude, I just finished telling you that Bin Laden released a broadcast on Al Jazeera admitting he was behind the attack. What do YOU call it, if not "unable to remain silent", "taking credit" and "trumpeting his own survival"? That's certainly what it sounds like to me.
Ahem...from all the conspiracy websites selling books, DVDs, T-shirts, hats, decals, etc. You walked right into that one.
The fact that NATO invoked article 5 after Sept 11 is in the public record and it cannot be refuted. It's the whole reason French troops, German troops, British troops, etc etc etc are in Afghanistan now. If you don't know what article 5 is then it's your responsibility to find out what it is before posting, not simply say "it's a pack of lies".
The Open Chemical Physics Journal
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
It ought to be plainly obvious that there are a LOT of reports and rumors floating around coming from "unconfirmed reports released by undisclosed sources" about bin Laden. It doesn't mean any of them are actually true.
I am only going by YOUR claims that everyone from the FAA to NATO to Al Jazeera to the Boy scounts are actively trying to cover up the "secret conspiracy". In case you haven't realized...and apparently you haven't...the more people you accuse of being involved in the conspiracy and/or coverup, the more the tally adds up.
18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism.'
The problem is that these self serving con artists are putting out garbage on these conspiracy websites for their own financial gain and you're swallowing their poison
becuase they're intentionally not telling you enough for you to make an honest assessment. You're just the victim in this, as well.
If I can tickle your ear just enough so that it will finally dawn on you that something just doesn't sound right with these conspiracy stories being passed around the Internet, then I'll be happy.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
claiming that the BBC making a mistake in their reporting...