911 Official Story is officially confirmed a story, page 2

reply to post by GoodOlDave

Again, GoodOlDave the post is not about me. We are debating a topic in here, not just having a rant, or an opinion session, or what you think about 911 conspiracy people.
If you want to debate me then man-up, step up to the plate and present your evidences with credible sources, to back your OS. If you are not willing to do that then you are wasting my time.

According to French intelligence sources, Bin Laden ALSO died in 2006 from Typhus. How could he have died in 2006 if he died in 2001?

Sources please? Or, we will assume this is your opinion, which doesn’t hold any truth.

Dude, I just finished telling you that Bin Laden released a broadcast on Al Jazeera admitting he was behind the attack. What do YOU call it, if not "unable to remain silent", "taking credit" and "trumpeting his own survival"? That's certainly what it sounds like to me.

Give me a direct link to your source.

Ahem...from all the conspiracy websites selling books, DVDs, T-shirts, hats, decals, etc. You walked right into that one.

Walk into what?

The fact that NATO invoked article 5 after Sept 11 is in the public record and it cannot be refuted. It's the whole reason French troops, German troops, British troops, etc etc etc are in Afghanistan now. If you don't know what article 5 is then it's your responsibility to find out what it is before posting, not simply say "it's a pack of lies".

This is what is called a Red Herring. However, since you brought NATO and article 5 these countries agreed on the alledge information, which later turn out to be false such as WMD and I should not have to sources this because everyone in the world knows this. Furthermore, France and Germany were NOT happy with the alleged info that all the allies of NATO went with.

What dose this have to do with proving the OS is true? How dose “article 5” disprove creditable science that proves the WTC were brought down by the use of military grade explosives. Thermit and Thermate, was found in the WTC dust.

The Open Chemical Physics Journal
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

www.bentham-open.org.../2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

See, GoodOlDave this is how a debate works you have to present creditable evidences to support your argument.

It ought to be plainly obvious that there are a LOT of reports and rumors floating around coming from "unconfirmed reports released by undisclosed sources" about bin Laden. It doesn't mean any of them are actually true.

I am only interested in facts, not undisclosed sources, or rumors.

I am only going by YOUR claims that everyone from the FAA to NATO to Al Jazeera to the Boy scounts are actively trying to cover up the "secret conspiracy". In case you haven't realized...and apparently you haven't...the more people you accuse of being involved in the conspiracy and/or coverup, the more the tally adds up.

This is your opinion only. your DESPERATE attempt to discredit me is ridiculous I have NEVER made any such claim that (Al Jazeera to the Boy scounts are actively trying to cover up the "secret conspiracy.") This is YOU using Disinformation techniques.

18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism.'

www.whale.to...

The problem is that these self serving con artists are putting out garbage on these conspiracy websites for their own financial gain and you're swallowing their poison

Again, this topic is not about me, or what you think about people who do not believe in the OS fairytale or where we go to obtain our information so please stay on topic.

becuase they're intentionally not telling you enough for you to make an honest assessment. You're just the victim in this, as well.

I am not a victim, and I will be the judge of what reading materials that I deem credible for my assessment or what I consider factual. It is so funny the OS is (not telling you enough for you to make an honest assessment.) that is what you should have figured out that is missing in the OS.

If I can tickle your ear just enough so that it will finally dawn on you that something just doesn't sound right with these conspiracy stories being passed around the Internet, then I'll be happy.

How about tickling your own ears by staying away from disinfo sites and doing some real research into 911. Stop parroting FOX News and opinions from a corrupt Neocons Republican party. There are more 911 disinformation web sites than there are of creditable truth web sites, one only needs to use common sense.

[edit on 17-6-2009 by impressme]