Originally posted by ArMaP
Originally posted by richierichHow else to explain the fact that even huge craters are no deeper than the small ones? The force of a
large impacting rock would tend to create a very deep craterm but no matter how big, on the moon they are never deeper than the small ones.
The "official" explanation is that a bigger impact releases so much energy that it melts the meteor and the place where it hit, so that's why
bigger craters have a shallow and flat surface.
I hope you and others will not swallow that nonsense. The release of energy from a large object does NOT abate just because it is bigger!! Amazing
what silly foolishness the NASA drones will spew.
Think about it: In every case studied, the impact crater from a large object is MUCH deeper than with a small one. To believe that a large one could
do the same damage as a small one is beyond insane.
Meteors do not MELT because they impact an object. They impact and explode...otherwise we would see the results of millions of melted asteroids all
over the place, yet we see none.
It is akin to saying that one stick of dynamite placed on the ground would leave a crater the same size as 100 sticks...and that is crazy. try it
sometime. The larger the impact and force, the deeper the hole. To think that a large asteroid would MELT upon impact and cause no more damage than a
small one is not even worthy of consideration.
Look at Meteor Crater out west in the USA...why is it so deep? According to your answer, it should be no deeper than s amll one that was impacted by
a much smaller object, right? Well, it is not!!
The ONLY explanation that makes any sense is this: There is a layer on the moons surface that goes the same depth all the way around the moon. No
matter how much of a force blasts the surface, whether it be a gigantic object or a tiny one, the depth remains the same. If this were not true, we
would see the largest craters MUCH deeper thqan the smaller ones...yet what we see, and is fact, is that at a certain depth, the moon becomes
virtually impenetrable.
The excuse given by the coverup artists cannot be verified with science or the evidence. To imagine that a huge object would cause no more damage
than a small one defies logic.
Why should the earth worry about getting hit by a large asteroid? If you are correct, there would be no big deal because the larger object would '
melt' instead of blasting a hole in the earth..right? If bigger objects have the same destructive force as a small one, then we would be silly to
worry about being struck, would'nt we?
Please give some source...some science, that shows that s large object impacting at high speed causes no more damage, depth wise, than a small one.
It cannot be found, as it goes against all physics.
If the people who believe this nonsense had to exxplain why and show proof, they would slink away muttering...because it is IMPOSSIBLE for a large
object traveling at high speed to do no more damage than a small one....UNLESS there is an armored layer that cannot be penetrated.
THAT explains it perfectly: No matter how wide the crater, no matter how big the object hitting it, the depth remains constant. That CANNOT be
explained away by saying that the larger object ' melts' upon impact...unreal. WHAT would make it melt? And how could it melt before it had a
chance to dig a hole from impact?
If you dropped a bowling ball from an airplane, and right next to it you dropped a ball bearing one inch across, which is going to be found deeper?
The bowling ball, of course. It contained enough latent energy to displace more dirt than a ball bearing weighing much less.
The moon is an armored construct. It has a layer several miles deep of outer rock and sand and such...but beneath it is an impenetrable layer made
of armor...that could withstand a trip thru the solar system, at least, and withstand bombardment from countless small and large objects hitting
it...and was placed into its present orbit intentionally.
There are more factors of evidence to support what I just said than there is all the nonsense we have been told by the liars and coverup artists at
NASA.
The next time someone tells you that small objects do as much damage as large ones, tell them that there is no evidence for that theory, and that
such has never been observed in all of history...it goes against all that is known about physics.
..... I just don't see what you people seem to see all the time. 
