AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Science & Technology discussion forum.  (rss)


Introducing the Warpship!


<<  1    2    3  >>



reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 02:19 PM by jkrog08


reply to post by Astyanax



I do not think you would encounter that paradox if you were simply moving a region of space. You would certainly get to things much quicker but not hit them before you get there IMO.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 02:26 PM by mystiq


Hyperspace seems better bet for space travel, possibly connected to the blue clowdy thing I saw in the night sky. Though that could have been a worm hole. That is far better than going around and advertising that your the new kids on the block with bicycle tires! We could attract some bad attention back home because of this kind of thing.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 02:32 PM by Gorman91


reply to post by jkrog08



I think it's in Europe. but not CERN.

Europe is turning into the future of power research.

news.bbc.co.uk...

The BBC series:


www.youtube.com...

[edit on 17-6-2009 by Gorman91]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 02:34 PM by thegagefather


The aliens may have us beat in technology..

But at least we're still blowing them away in bad assery.




   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 02:40 PM by MysterE


Originally posted by thegagefather
The aliens may have us beat in technology..

But at least we're still blowing them away in bad assery.




bad assery! Thats great! I might start a thread based soley on those two words! Thanks for the smile thegagefather!

-E-



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 02:41 PM by Gorman91


reply to post by thegagefather



bare in mind that we have described aliens, their crafts, and their ways the same for thousands of years. Yet we've been advancing exponentially. We'll beat them on time to get to places.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 27-6-2009 @ 10:18 PM by Cyberbian


Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by Cyberbian



That's because we have yet to fully know how. We know how to create it, just not if it would work... because we have yet to make it. Until we start spending money to test such designs, we never will know. But theoretically, what I described could work. There's no reason why it couldn't. It'd just be trillions of dollars and need mass and energy enough to create a small star. LOTS of time and effort. But hey, they already are building a fusion power facility that creates a small star. Who knows how far it will be in a decade.



Again, NO! Please enroll for a reading comprehension class.

The article clearly states THEY HAVE NO IDEA HOW TO FORM THE BUBBLE!

NO IDEA! That means they don't even know where to begin looking. It is totally beyond the current ablility to conceive of any wildly, remotely possible way, none, zero zilch. Nada!




[edit on 27-6-2009 by Cyberbian]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 27-6-2009 @ 10:18 PM by Cyberbian


Sorry double clicked.



[edit on 27-6-2009 by Cyberbian]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 27-6-2009 @ 10:23 PM by warrenb


TBH, I was really expecting something cooler looking.

I guess I've been spoiled with all the SCI-FI and CGI in movies and TV



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-7-2009 @ 11:29 PM by muzzleflash


Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by sharps



The poster didn't say dark matter was a farce, they said most of modern physics was a farce. So I would still like to know how this poster knows more than those who have actually studies physics.


Because every year they disprove something from a few decades ago. And that keeps happening every year. Its a Pattern.

One that repeats itself so often, its safe to say, modern physics is mostly inaccurate.

Why would I waste years on a PhD for something that will be obsolete by the time I graduated?

And that is why I went with History and Philosophy

Sorry to get so off topic there, but i felt it was relevant enough to go ahead and post it. Since it was about physics.

BTW - My main influences are Carl Sagan and Michio Kaku, if that matters.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


<<  1    2    3  >>

















































ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.068 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.