It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Real UFO Hunters

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 15 2009 @ 03:08 PM
link   
I just had a thought while watching some abduction videos on why someone
has not put together a team to simply monitor people who are having
frequent abduction scenarios. At the very least have some cameras in hotspot
areas where people claim to be abducted in their home. It would just take getting
10 or so volunteers who are having frequent abduction experiences in their home
to put up cameras etc so an investigation can be done with the footage then get a
team involved in hopes of catching them in the act. Sounds like a very easy test
that could produce the proof we have been looking for. I know if I was being taken
this would be one of the first things I would do to find out what in the world is going on.




posted on Jun, 15 2009 @ 03:24 PM
link   
because i'm sure nobody is convinced enough that they are actually being abducted. having people film you wile you sleep only to see you freak out a bit in your sleep would be disappointing for believers. and the opposite for disbelievers, although it would be enlightening for both groups.

I can bet people have tried this independently to no results.

besides, if aliens want the cameras off i'm sure their is no issue in doing it


[edit on 15-6-2009 by Kevin_X1]



posted on Jun, 15 2009 @ 03:29 PM
link   
Guess I was not clear. I mean the abductee themselves go out and buy some small cheap cameras that you can mount in any room. If they feel they had an experience they simply review the tape to see what happened. I only say to get an actual team there once there is enough tape to see a pattern to predict the next abduction.



posted on Jun, 15 2009 @ 04:44 PM
link   
I've heard stories, I can't remember where so don't ask, that this was tried before and it failed. It seemed the "visitors" are able to anticipate countermeasures and can disable surveillance equipment through as yet unknown means. That only makes sense if they are trying to conceal their activities. Some accounts have them passing through solid walls so shutting off a video camera(s) would not pose a problem I would think. As for having a team conduct surveillance, that is also impractical from both a planning and execution perspective. Some abductions occur months or even years between incidents so predicting any pattern is almost impossible. Even if they did, it is just as likely that any surveillance team could be dealt with as effectively as a video camera, ie: put to sleep for the duration of the abduction or perhaps opening themselves up for an unwanted abduction experience of their own.



posted on Jun, 15 2009 @ 04:59 PM
link   
I agree that those are some good points, but to me it still makes sense that if we truly want to get some real answers we need to find a way to catch them in the act. Im sure if you have enough people doing it someone will stumble on some type of weakness that we can exploit.



posted on Jun, 15 2009 @ 05:16 PM
link   
I think it's a great idea. Perhaps this is what you would see.



This is a clip from a TV show in the US (I think it was House).
It just reminded me of what it might look like (if were real).



posted on Jun, 15 2009 @ 05:18 PM
link   
lol imagine capturing the real thing!



posted on Jun, 15 2009 @ 05:50 PM
link   
There was a thread on here where someone did set up a team, I think it may have been one of the mods.

The person watching over the potential abductee suddenly felt ill and wandered off to the bathroom.

People have tried cameras and either they stop working or the abductee gets up in the middle of the night and switches it off. But has no memory of this the next day.



posted on Jun, 15 2009 @ 06:22 PM
link   
Like anything else. You keep experimenting to find their weakness. We know they are not gods so they must be vulnerable to something.



posted on Jun, 15 2009 @ 07:33 PM
link   
I would put a couple of decoy cameras and one that is not known to anyone who is there at the time.



new topics

top topics



 
1

log in

join