Proud To Be American? You Should Be Ashamed, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times


reply posted on 15-6-2009 @ 02:25 PM by ManBehindTheMask
reply to post by whaaa



yes i had to edit my post bud, lol i realized that your name was similar to someone else tho NOT the same person, so forgive my slip there!


reply posted on 15-6-2009 @ 02:26 PM by apacheman
Aye, there's the rub: what to do that is effective in bringing about the sort of change we want. Pretty much everyone I know is aware of the situation and how screwed we all are, but no one can figure out what to do about it.

The problem, I think is sheer numbers: 340 or so million Americans. To get to 10% you need 34 million focussed on one thing. That's a lot of people. Getting that many coordinated is a more than monumental task. It is a time-consuming task. And most Americans are smart enough to realize that in the process, if anyone or any group became truly effective, they would be attacked in multiple ways and isolated, thus rendering them safe for TPTB. You know the drill: financial, sexual, drug, and political allegations that destroy the reputation and consume all the resources, ultimately ending in "suicide" or bancruptcy.

Who or what do you target? If you march in a commercial district the cops will arrest you and/or beat you. If you march in a wealthy neighborhood, same, except the people you want to influence aren't there because this is just one of their residences. The corporate elite are remote and mobile, with many layers of protection. They can safely ignore any sort protest if the people peacefully march.

So again: what can be done?

The only things I see as effective are difficult in the extreme to accomplish: a general strike might work, but what are you striking for? Higher minimum wage? Affordable healthcare? Lower taxes? Higher taxes? Better schools? It's pretty frustrating...none of those things solves anything, really. If you can't define and agree upon what you're striking for and provide a plan to get there, it's a pointless endeavor.

Here's my one thing, one idea to unite behind and strike for that might actually create the sorts of change that we all want:

Cap wealth.

Limit wealth to one billion dollars per individual, counting cash, stocks, bonds, cars, furs, jewelry, homes, boats, etc., in the total, no matter where in the world it is located.

Tax everything above that at 100%. Give those currently over four years to disburse their excess wealth within a set of guidelines. Mandatory commercial retirement when the cap is reached. Remember, the thing that most distinguishes the super-wealthy from the rest of us is not their intellectual or business acumen superiority, but rather their callousness and ruthlessness. They are replaceable; quite easily, in fact. After a billion dollars, they can work philanthropically or play or actually (god forbid) raise thier children and be with thier families.

That's my take: I've spent a great deal of time thinking about this and actually writing a law, the Maximum Individual Wealth Act, MIWA for short, that explicitly defines what, who, and how. Penalties are genuine, too: loss of citizenship and the privelege of doing businessin or for the US, its territories or possessions, visiting or living within the same, as well as economic sanctions.

Other than that, the only thing I see that will effectively change anything is collapse a la USSR, and who what sort of change we'll get then...



reply posted on 18-6-2009 @ 01:50 PM by holyTerror
Originally posted by Tentickles
reply to
post by holyTerror



So youre saying it isnt your problem then? That if this doest effect your money you should keep on watching TV ignoring the fact the government has become a tyrant and imperial dictator ship over our economy?


That's not what I'm saying at all.

1. Of course it affects my money. People losing their savings affects every American in one way or another. We can't have an economy without individual spending.

2. You cannot equate my watching TV with me ignoring the state of the government. TV isn't a distraction for me, or a time-waster, it is entertainment, pure and simple.

3. How do you know I am ignoring the government? I'm on ATS, for one. I read all the same headlines and articles everyone else does. I am familiar with the government's tyranical rule, I actually experience it first-hand each time I receive my paycheck.

I understand you weren't trying to insult me, but please leave my TV watching out of this argument.


reply posted on 22-6-2009 @ 02:32 AM by Question
I invite you to please take a look at the following:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

There may not be many of us willing to do something, but we're there, and some of us are planning to do something about it.


reply posted on 22-6-2009 @ 02:37 AM by Question
reply to post by badgerprints



Half of this country did NOT vote for this, please, for the love of god, get your facts straight. Half of REGISTERED voters, voted for this. There's a HUGE difference. I have done the numbers myself, and trust me, they don't come close to 50% of the population.

Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



On why America is in denial and Ron Paul will not be elected
  Posted 18 days ago with 21 member flags
Study says racists and conservatives are dumb
  Posted 7 days ago with 16 member flags
Is ‘anti-Canadianism’ the new ‘anti-Americanism?’
  Posted 17 days ago with 8 member flags
Clarification on the definition of "natural born citizen"
  Posted 15 days ago with 7 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 16 hours ago, 68 replies
Official Maine Caucus Results Thread!!
  2012 US Elections, Posted 6 hours ago, 56 replies