MSM outlet reports "Is there a Mars Conspiracy"!, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 66 times
Topic started on 15-6-2009 @ 11:44 AM by Dermo
Im not too sure if "The Times" is a big media outlet across the atlantic in the America's but in the UK and Ireland it is one of the most circulated and trusted Newspapers.. And from personal experience, I have found that their political opinions are more factual and less bias than most. I know it is sold in multiple countries, is also a major Business reporter and its online variation is HUGE.

Earlier today I spotted this on the front page of its .co.uk website, It has since been replaced by other headlines but is still in the main section.

Link

Also, the TimesOnline.co.uk homepage also gets over two million views a day!!!!! That is a potential two million instant viewers today and the possibility of an awful lot more over the next week... and that is just on the .co.uk URL.

Now, while the paper itself is not responsible for the original research, it has taken much of its information from research done by a NewScientist consultant.

I firmly believe in microbial life of some description on Mars but that is not the point of this post, The story is basically pointing out that there is no possible way NASA could be stupid enough to cause the problems it has with the hardware it has landed on Mars and is therefore covering up its actual findings.

I think this is another big deal in the "Disclosure" stages.. simply because its become almost common place for people to read this type of information from outlets they trust without blinking an eyelid.. and it has been happening more and more recently.

Wasn't that the supposed reason for the "cover up and slow disclosure" in the first place.. If there is such a "conspiracy"... In my opinion, if this was actually taking place, it wouldn't be a conspiracy but for our own good.. As we all know, a person is intelligent but people are absolutely stupid.

Anywho.. here's the thought provoking quote that grabbed my attention..


Some pesky scientists have just pointed out an appalling design error in NASA’s latest attempts to find life on Mars. This is beginning to look like a conspiracy. Does someone not want us to find life on Mars?

NASA has tried looking for signs of life on Mars precisely once, in the 1976 Viking mission. The result was positive. The reason nobody says there is life on Mars is that another experiment, part of the same mission, couldn’t find any carbon-based “organic” chemicals in Martian soil. This, NASA decided, overruled the other result: with no carbon present, there could be no microbes living on or under the surface of Mars.

Last year, the Phoenix lander repeated the carbon search and failed to find organic molecules. The problem is, we know that there ought to be organic molecules on Mars. Asteroid and comet impacts will have put them there. So what’s going on?


Hmmm?


[edit on 15/6/09 by Dermo]


reply posted on 15-6-2009 @ 03:11 PM by nunya13
reply to post by sandman692



As the article and the OP pointed out, those "excuses" such as two different teams using different measuring systems, used to explain mission failures, happen too often for them to just chalk it up to human error.

Those "excuses" for why a mission "failed"; therefore, finding were inconclusive, they "lost" a rover that could give us vital information somehow, or a mistake in using two different measuring systems caused a catastrophic failure could just be a cover in order for them not to tell us what they found.

Think about it, they HAVE to say they lost the rover or made a mistake resulting in the inability to produce results/findings because if they didn't use those excuses they would have to produce results.

Scenario: A rover is on Mars and captures some Earth shattering, mind boggling information completely challenging everything we have ever known or thought about existence. You can't just give this information out to the public on a whim. But the public knows you sent a rover to Mars and is anticipating finding out the results. So you just tell them you lost the rover due to a stupid human error that an extremely intelligent person getting paid buttloads of money made. Oops! Sorry, there's no information to give.

Too quaint in my opinion, considering we are dealing with people who are literally rocket scientists.



reply posted on 15-6-2009 @ 03:40 PM by smurfy
reply to post by Elliot

Did not the late Father say that he witnessed the Crucifixion
by the Chronovisor?,and that would have been years before he died.



[edit on 15-6-2009 by smurfy]


reply posted on 15-6-2009 @ 03:50 PM by kiwifoot
reply to post by Dermo



That's crazy, the reponse to your thread,

I posted the exact same article on the 120609

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Nobody cared!

I guess ABN sucks!

[edit on 15-6-2009 by kiwifoot]


reply posted on 15-6-2009 @ 03:55 PM by sean
reply to post by sandman692



You want to talk about black holes. I have been telling people for years that NASA and the military is the biggest black hole ever! They keep sucking up our money for a bunch of useless crap.


reply posted on 15-6-2009 @ 04:17 PM by Elliot
reply to post by smurfy


Father Ernetti faked the picture of the crucifixion and was proved to have lied over his picture of the dying christ.

He did this to try to prove a belief that turned out not to be true.

No life on Mars? Are we really so sure about that or does NASA just not want there to be life on Mars?


[edit on 15-6-2009 by Elliot]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Life Spotted on Venus - Russian Scientist
  Posted 18 days ago with 100 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 13 days ago with 60 member flags
Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 4 days ago with 59 member flags
New UFO footage from my hometown
  Posted 16 days ago with 34 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 7 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 14 days ago with 28 member flags