It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Memysabu
We didnt need to use the nukes in ww2, we used them to test them and their affects on people.
Originally posted by Tentickles
I just love the hypocrisy of this whole conflict. We invaded Iraq and Afghanistan for "suspected WMDs" and we wont even touch North Korea and they HAVE nuclear weapons, they have the largest standing army (besides China) and are organized.
Originally posted by Memysabu
We didnt need to use the nukes in ww2, we used them to test them and their affects on people. We had already won the war, you might be in need of a history lesson. Theres a dang good film on it. Ive forgotten the name but it interviews survivors of the attack. Heck we won the minute we started dropping napalm on their wooden houses from the b2's. That I might add said we wouldnt do. Burning an innocent civilian population alive was pretty low. Dropping the nukes was even lower.
[edit on 14-6-2009 by Memysabu]
Originally posted by Tentickles
Originally posted by Ansiroth
This is a serious problem. Nuclear weapons do not need to be fired in todays age.
North Korea is living 50 years in the past.
50 Years ago:
Cold War
Nuclear Threat from Russia
Ignorant People
It goes on...