Originally posted by OpusMarkII
I guess the state owns the children ,and the people are nothing more than cattle to bread .

I'm assuming that was sarcasm.

NOBODY OWNS my children, not even us, their parents.

Certainly not this tin pot state we have, now or ever.

They are their own free, individuals, not property.

The large majority of what i have read here in the support of home schooling is a marked overreaction and a perception of this new legislation as an attack on the tradition of home schooling. While this may or may not be the case it is irrelevant to the possible (and neccesary) benefits that this legislation will also bring.

Most parents that home school their children will not be doing it to cover up for abuse but some will. And that minority, as small as it may be makes it neccesary to give those in the right extra work so as to protect those that are being harmed. It is not ideal to say the least, but that is just how systems of human interaction need to work in order to protect the few that are being wronged by a mostly inconspicuous practice.

This may well have been already said but i read to about page 5 of the thread before i tired of the vehement and ill aimed complaints of pro home schoolers. For a forum aparently dedicated to objectivity it amazes me so many people are using ancedotal evidence to advance their opinon. Why WOULD you meet children abused by their parents under the cover of home schooling. The practice of doing so is marked by massive isolation and thus it renders your point moot.

To clarify i hold no opinon on home schooling being bad or good and as a libertrarian i believe it the parents (and childs) right to decide either way. Sadly human nature is not so perfect as to enable a system where we can trust all people to do right.

It may also intrest you to know i am a 16 year old that just finished his GCSES in a London inner-city state school. It really is not AS bad as it is often made out to be, and its not any worse than it was. Theres is a long history of mental, physical and sexual abuse in insitutions of education, arguable worse in public (that refers to paid for schools in the united kingdom) schools paticularly those in which studens stay there residentially.

Let us escape the tradition of believing things are worse than they ever were, it is irritating in its ignorance more than anything.

Peace

Seems like the OPs topic got a little forgotten over the pages. They seem pretty worried about the idea of this new found government intervention that includes being able to interview the child/children with no parent present.

While it would appear to be a good idea to keep an eye on the ones doing the teaching and that the child(ren) are getting to at least some predetermined level each year then all should be great. But eve the idea that you can get more honesty out of a child if there is no abusive or whatever bad way a parent cna trerat their children I would think that it would be just as easy to coach the child to say what the interviewer wanted them to say. Especially with a younger child that will have a natural fear of some strange person taking them into a room alone to talk to the about things.

I can see a situation where the interviewer says to the child that they are (work for) the government and if the child was to not answer correctly someone could get into a lot of trouble. Us grown ups have a way sometimes of talking to children in a way that kind of forces them to say what we want.

And I would imagine with many abused kids it's pretty easy to train them to keep quiet about things. Even if there as some inspector coming one day to talk to them. They are being schooled by an abusive parent. I'm sure hey could teach them that too.

Both sides of this argument/debate are looking a little funky to me. I am finding it a little disturbing that the schools are as bad as what I'm seeing in some of these posts. but I know there are schools here that have some pretty bad problems too so throwing stones is not what this glass maker thinks to wise.

At the end of the day these children that we bring into this world are our responsibility. They didn't ask to come, we brought them anyway. We own them the best we have to get them ready for when they get their shot at being an adult. If that involves home schooling then fine. But they should at least be up with other kids their age academically. f they go further then great! As long as these kids have time to be kids too.

If I was home schooling my children then I would expect to see someone about what I am teaching them. What materials am I using, etc. That makes sense to me. expect educators get evaluated so it stands to reason that I would too. But the idea that someone takes my child into a room alone and asks them questions with no parent or guardian is not going to happen. While I do not own the children they are my responsibility. And no one is going to tell me any different. I understand the post(s) earlier saying things like the "line is drawn here". Like most parents I am extremely protective of my children. I see no problems interviewing them but they will have to do it with a parent present. Anything else is a violation of my rights adn those of my children.

Many people out there do not think the public school system is doing a very good job educating the children. happen to believe they fall short but I also believe that there are kind of supposed to. There is not enough time in the day to teach everything and some of that education even of a public school student falls on the parents. Creating an awareness of the world around us and how it works is a 24/7 project. Kids need us as parents as well as the school system to teach them about what is going on in the world and why. Getting more than one source of information on any given subject can be a great thing. It takes more than a school to teach all the things a child will need to prepare them for the world. The one plus I see in educating outside the home is they get more than one person and their ideals on a subject. But I'm sure a parent that is willing to take the steps to educate their children at home thinks about things like that. At least I hope so.

Anyway, opinions are like noses, everyone has one and they all smell (I'm sure a few of you are snickering thinking about a similar saying :lol. This one is just mine. Parents, if you're going to teach them teach them well. And I do hope that they are getting some views besides one persons. It helps with all that forming an independent opinion stuff

What the hell?

A bad parent is a bad parent no matter what. Doesn't matter if they home school you, send you to a public school, or feed you with a golden spoon. Removing RIGHTS such as teaching your own children is ONLY bad. There is nothing good from it, besides the one case in a million (like everything in life).

If a parent knows best for their children, they do. If they do not, they do not. Public education will not change that 99% of the time.

I do not believe that my government (in the US) is concerned about the well-being of children, and here's why:

Years after my own experience of being taken away from my parents' home for truancy by the Department of Human Services (posted a page or two ago) ended and I was an adult, I tried to draw their attention to something that I thought actually deserved it.

I learned that my cousin (we'll call him Jerry) had a daughter who was living with his mother and sisters, because he could not afford to take care of her himself and her own mother had run off. There were at least 8 people living there.

Jerry's little girl was 8 or 9 years old. I learned that since Jerry's mother and sisters (all very overweight and lazy) made the little girl carry baskets of laundry up a hill to another relative's home regularly. She had to stay there and wait for the laundry to be done, fold it all, and carry it all back down the hill.

I only know this because I witnessed it one day and my mother (who lives nearby) told me that Jerry's daughter does it all the time. The other children who lived with them were not given any chores, they played outside while she did all their laundry. My mother also told me that she had seen Jerry's family being verbally/emotionally abusive to his daughter when my mother saw them at church every week.

The girl's biological mother was black, while Jerry's family is white. It occurred to me that this fact may have something to do with them treating her so differently than the other kids, and that made me uncomfortable.

My mother was concerned as well, but she was afraid to "start drama" with them. I decided to call my old DHS social worker directly and ask her to look into the situation, I believed that if she paid them a visit perhaps they would realize their wrong-doing wouldn't go unnoticed.

The social worker told me quite simply "there is nothing we can do". She refused to even investigate.

Come to think of it, that's not the only time I have heard DHS social workers say that...

When I was 14 and in a group home, I was in my room one night around Christmastime in Pennsylvania (very snowy) and I heard someone crying (not unusual in placement), but I realized it was coming from outside.

Out the window I saw a little boy, wearing no shoes or coat, crying on the sidewalk. I told the woman who worked at the group home and she brought the boy inside. We learned that he had woken up to find that he and his little sister were alone at home.

The woman called another group home employee to come in, so that she could take the boy home. When she did, she found out that his mom had left the kids with a 15-year-old babysitter so she could go to a bar.

When she returned home (intoxicated), the kids were asleep and she thought it was okay to drive the teenage babysitter home. The mother told the group home employee that she thought the kids were safe "because we have a dog".

This outraged the woman who worked at the group home, and when she came back to work she called the emergency DHS social worker to report the incident. She was told by the social worker that nothing could be done, the social worker knew who the boy's mother was, she worked at a hospital, she was a "good person".

The social worker said that if the group home employee had called before bringing the boy into the group home, she would have been instructed to leave him alone and "let one of the neighbors take him home". This further outraged the group home employee, but she could do nothing.

No, I do not trust that DHS operates objectively and without bias. And since I have a history with them myself, I am certainly not going to let them have any interaction with my children whatsoever.

Please, do not try to tell me that the government or all of its employees have the best interests of children at heart.

Fight it. I should have been home schooled. Collective education makes all kids one way and one thought, eliminating diversity of imagination. I was lucky enough to not care enough for school. What irony. The one who doesn't care is the smartest and most creative in the class. It's built so that only the drones get to the top.

Originally posted by FlyersFan


As for child abuse ... the greatest number of abuse cases come out of public schools. THAT is a fact.

I have seen the truth of that for myself. I have Asperger syndrome, and very few teachers have any clue what that is. Basically, it is on the high-functioning end of the autistic spectrum. In other words, my IQ is well above average (140) and I can learn just fine, but social cues sometimes go right over my head, and I quite often have incredible difficulty verbalizing what is in my head. I can write it just fine, I just have more trouble speaking it. As a result, I was routinely a target for teacher (and principal) screaming fits - complete with the finger in my face and the forceful muscling around that you only see on movies dealing with corrupt or "outmoded" reform schools.

The thing that everyone needs to remember is this: What is a government? A government is a collection of humans with control over the lives of other people who are just as human as they are. All the laws they pass accomplish nothing more than to take control out of the hands of one group of people, and put it into the hands of another. That's it.

IMO the government should have a monthly examiner come to the home of the child...THAT'S IT. None of this other bull

Originally posted by Gorman91
Fight it. I should have been home schooled. Collective education makes all kids one way and one thought, eliminating diversity of imagination. I was lucky enough to not care enough for school. What irony. The one who doesn't care is the smartest and most creative in the class. It's built so that only the drones get to the top.

Quite true, Gorman. My father is still a music teacher. My mother never went to college, but she's smart enough in her own way too. I really wish I had been homeschooled. That is why now I work hard to educate myself. In other words, I'm home-schooling myself, so to speak. We all need to do that, and it's surprisingly easy to do. All you need to do is follow these steps:

1. Turn off the TV

2. Buy a book.

3. Read it. If after you finish it you don't fully understand it, read it again.

4. Buy another book.

5. Repeat steps 1 thru 4 on a constant basis.

Don't just go for the fictional stuff (although you can learn some interesting stuff from those too). Find bookstores that sell college textbooks and buy some. You can even get home-schooling materials from American Opinion publishing - run by the John Birch Society. I know there are other sources for home-schooling materials, I'm just not sure what they are! The point is, turn the TV off (it can't help you) and open a book!! READ! READ! READ!!

Originally posted by rentacop1976

My reference to the Amish is quite deliberate. While I don't agree with their refusal to use modern technology, I have to admit that many of their methods are effective, and that in an overall sense, they are probably the most content of any of us in the world.

Indeed, I envy their sense of community and that they are so self-sufficient. Don't forget that their children are usually bi-lingual also, speaking English as well as some dialect of German, I believe.

As a teenager, I was ashamed to learn that there's a touch of Pennsylvania Dutch (as my grandmother called it) in my genealogy from my father's father's side of the family, but I've come to respect their culture and their way of life, as well as having it as part of my own family's heritage!

I wonder how (if at all) home education regulations affect them.

Originally posted by manbird12000
...What he means by "My children belong to me" is that the ONLY authoritative power over his children that is higher than his is GOD.

..... and for some people...even HE isn't above.

He may not own them but they DO belong to him before ANYTHING else under God.

And what he means by "the line has been drawn" is that his life IS his child. A Father has NOTHING to loose when his future blood is threatened.
And that is a DEADLY person to deal with on a level of horror most people won't expect.

Trust me, I'm sharpening my Hatchet just thinking about it..

Note: substitute "Hatchet" with any other item that wreaks death and destruction when used.

Only a kid or non parent would say what you just said.

Perfect. I forget the author, but I heard a quote awhile back that went something like "Having children is like letting your heart go out into the world on its own." I think it's just a nicer way to sum up what was said above. I never joke about killing people, I have never threatened anyone...but if you put my kids in a threatening situation you will be met with blind rage. That said, I'm not sure if forcing my kids to go to public school calls for said rage. I would just need to be more diligent at home to compensate.