I had a taste of private and comprehensive schooling, and found both to be a huge waste of time and in many ways an impediment to an inquisitive
instinct and appetite for learning and knowledge.
I spent my formative years at a private boarding school for boys which did nothing for my social skills or self-esteem. Religion, pugilism, cold
outdoor swims, bad food and petty rules enforced by a hierarchy of resentful pupils and corporal punishment were the orders of the day. As the only
vegetarian in the school, my lunch consisted of one apple and a slice of white bread with margarine.
I avoided many of the unappealing "character building" activities by hiding for several hours each day, apparently without ever arousing the concern
or interest of any teacher.
Only looking back after several years "in the real world" did I realize what an oddball selection of institutionalized social misfits and repressed
homosexuals most of the teachers were.
When I left, I was physically, socially and academically malnourished and my parents paid handsomely for it.
Generally parents opt for home schooling to provide a nurturing, personally tailored education that even the best schools struggle to provide.
I know a city and a country dwelling home schooled family. In both cases, it involved a major parental commitment but produced highly accomplished,
socially competent children with a unique perspective on life. I believe society as a whole benefits from individuals who have not been through the
homogenising process of state funded education.
Certainly it's true that children must understand and adapt to the social world around them, but equally there's an argument for protecting them
from being consumed by it.
State schools shunned for home education Guardian, Friday 8 February 2008



