I wonder what Jenna Bush's face, among others would have looked if they hadn't suddenly cut the cameras away from the subject, as they always do.

I don't buy that they are digital anomalies. These HD cameras may be picking up on something. Moods, spirits, vibrational levels, dimensional planes... something because it should be happening in the surrounding area and not just the faces/ eyes.

I would be convinced it was digital artifacts if someone provided an good example of it occurring away from faces.

If it is digital artifacts, then why is it replacing analog? It would be interesting, though if the camera operators would let the transformation play out from newscaster/ public figure to reptile or demon, but we won't see that happen.

I wonder If I could project my demon onto a HD camera by making angry faces and thoughts.

I remember one time a newscaster lady on Global tv in BC flashed the black eyes thing for an split second on my parent's set and I was like, wth?

I couldn't see these things on my analog signal, just my parent's digital subscription. I would see people's face scrambling, just their faces and it was downright bizarre. It's not supposed to happen IMO.


[edit on 13-6-2009 by star in a jar]

Originally posted by star in a jar
I would be convinced it was digital artifacts if someone provided an example of it occurring away from faces.

If it is digital artifacts, then why is it replacing analog? Digital looks terrible, yet interesting, if only the camera operators would let the transformation play out from newscaster to reptile or demon, but we won't see that happen.

Many of the threads of this type rely on youtube videos. Most youtube videos are encoded at 320x240, and a very low bitrate, I believe less than 350kbps. The low bitrate will cause artifacts within the image. You can see this most clearly in scenes with action, or high detail such as fire.

Even DVD quality, which IIRC, is 720x576 (PAL), and often around 4000kbps can show these artifacts at times.

Most footage on line is somewhere between these two levels of quality, and is just not acceptable to make any kind of judgment from. Serious researchers should be using at least HD at a very high bitrate, but I've not seen any videos in HD that show the same 'reptilian' effects.

Digital is replacing analog in part because it is much less bandwidth intensive, and still is capable of delivering quite high quality. I forget the details, but in the same space broadcasters output an analog TV channel, they could fit multiple channels in digital.

For starters: The reptilian-hybrid “elite” is the greedy New World Order/Illuminati scum that are actually on the way to destroy the whole world. I hope they – and all those who help cover up the issue and their crimes – will simply get what they deserve, probably in 2012. And I don’t think it’ll really help them to hide in those underground bunkers they’ve zealously been building.


[edit on 13-6-2009 by CoolBlackHole]

I just want to add, that in the case of the 'reptilian morphing', I believe that part of the problem is the codecs used to encode the video. One way they save space, in simple terms, is like this.

If a section of a frame differs very little from that same section in the previous frame, then (in simple terms), it will just use the same section from the prior frame. Now, as you use lower and lower bitrates, the threshold for this will become higher, so even sections that changed quite a bit will use parts from the prior frame. Often to compensate a blurring effect is used. This would be my most likely explanation for the way the faces shift a bit sometimes.

look, the jenna bush vid may be easily explained away as codec issues /artifacts

But...those double eye lid things? man that stuff is weird

i just don't see why a PROGRAM would only cause issues with peoples eyes, and never any other part of their body

why do the good vids always center around the eyes?

why aren't there any videos of noses, ears, ties, t-shirts, and background objects having bizarre side effects?

just an honest question

Sorry if the technical details are a bit too much, but really they have to be understood to understand the effect. Here is a shot from the first video:



Now, if you look where I have put lines in the right hand side, this corresponds to the blocks in the image. This is a clear indicator of poor video quality. You see the way that section appears to be shifted?

This is part of what I was trying to explain, about how internet videos will use sections from a prior frame to save space. Videos tend to be broken down into blocks of 8x8, 16x16 and such, and it shows that in that frame, it has used some blocks from prior frames, making it look shifted. This is a clear indicator to me, and to others who understand digital video, that the source video was just not high enough quality.

ya and since the "apollo moonwalks" were in such low quality, we should not believe them or accept them as evidence right?

sorry dude, these videos are pretty good quality

except that jenna bush vid, that ones complete crap (and i agree thats most likely artifacts)

the 2nd and 3rd videos are very clear and good as far as i am concerned, i can see the freckles on the guys skin...

so the words "low quality" is an opinion based on reference really

i just want to know why these artifacts only center on the eyes AND BOTH eyes too! not just one eye like i would expect from "digital artifacts" but instead it affects both eyes and does not even screw up his nose at all

I take the view that the term 'reptilian' when applied to politicians and celebrities it refers to their cold hearted and self serving mindsets.

Also there is the possibility that the societies we have allowed to develop has facilitated the concentration of psychopaths at highest levels of government and commerce. Psychopaths display a number of reptilian like features and is an apt description of them.