It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Secret US Military Autonomous Robot Project

page: 1
0
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 13 2009 @ 02:35 AM
link   
I've located what appears (to me) to be a secret US military robotic research and field test. The device in question is easily seen and appears to be constructed of very advanced technologically and apparently is fully autonomous. It was located using GE and was found high up in the Southern Groom mountains of Nevada. It's design is also unlike anything that I'm currently aware of in the public domain which is why I believe it to be a military project.
I've uploaded a number of images to my Photo Album for anyone interested to examine and would appreciate comments/feedbacks (only constructive, please). All images are completely untouched and original EXCEPT for contrast, brightness, sharpness and colour saturation tweaks to try to enhance details of the device. Some of the images have been annotated to highlight interesting/unusual structural components.

GE coordinates:
37° 4'33.21"N
115°34'28.81"W

Please feel free to ask any questions that you like and I will try to supply additional explanations.




posted on Jun, 13 2009 @ 02:51 AM
link   
reply to post by zetabeam
 


You aren't actually serious are you?

This:



is an autonomous armed robot??

Really?

Why is it's colouring the same as surrounding areas?

Why is it's Bilateral symmetrical head not very symmetrical with it's neck structure??

Time to step away from the computer me thinks!



posted on Jun, 13 2009 @ 02:54 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


Amazing .... you're actually saying that you can't see ANY definitive structure in the images ?
And the devices colouring is NOT identical to it's surroundings. It can be clearly seen to be an independent object and NOT an extension of it's background.



posted on Jun, 13 2009 @ 03:04 AM
link   
reply to post by zetabeam
 


You're really clutching at straws here.

Zoom out, I can see lots more blues, blacks and yellows that are the same shade as what you're showing all over the place, camouflage is it?


Why isn't there any roads or buildings nearby?

And I'll ask again, why is it's Bilateral symmetrical head not very symmetrical with it's neck structure?



posted on Jun, 13 2009 @ 03:17 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


Sorry to disagree but there's no "straw clutching" going on here at all.
The head has obvious symmetry as there can be seen a central tubular/cylindrical protruberance with an identical structure to either side of it giving the symmetrical shape.

I assume that you've taken a look at the original image using GE ? If so, how can you NOT see that the device is clearly independent of it's background and is most certainly NOT an image artifact or pixellation.
The object has too many well defined structural features visible to show that it is an independent object.
There is a central main body comprised of a larger, lower green platform with a smaller yellow platform above it. The head is clearly joined to the main green/yellow body platform by a thin neck. On either side of the main body are what appear to be cylindrical attachments. Mounted on the right side (looking at the image) is another structure shaped similar to a pawn from a chess set.
In total, there are too many detailed structural features visible to say that this is just a figment of my imagination or the result of an image artifact. The device is solid, real and exists.



posted on Jun, 13 2009 @ 03:26 AM
link   
reply to post by zetabeam
 


Cool.

So can you answer my questions?



posted on Jun, 13 2009 @ 03:36 AM
link   
reply to post by zetabeam
 


You've presented the facts well, now go find something with some substance and truth instead of some really shocking screen caps that could be anything, just imagine what it would be like to come to this site with something real, this is almost as bad as faces on the Moon/Mars a load of rubbish, go and find something real, not just rubbish, peace



posted on Jun, 13 2009 @ 03:37 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


The only question remaining was "why aren't there any roads or buildings?".

I completely agree with you on that point and yes, I looked around for any sign of them and found no traces whatsoever. So for the device to be where it is, it had to be either airlifted there or had to arrive at that location under it's own power. Airlifting seemed to be illogical because if it's what it seems to be - a self contained and mobile device - and undergoing tests in the rugged montains, it makes more sense to see how the device copes with that sort of terrain under it's own power. If it arrived at that location under it's own ability, does that mean it's under remote human control or is it autonomous and able to navigate on it's own ? If what I believe I'm seeing is a highly advanced military device undergoing field tests, I have no direct proof but get an impression of autonomy ... which obviously leads to the suggestion of some form of AI capability.



posted on Jun, 13 2009 @ 03:39 AM
link   
reply to post by Pockets
 


Ok, no probs ... your opinion is every bit as valid as mine ... so thanks for your time.



posted on Jun, 13 2009 @ 03:39 AM
link   
reply to post by zetabeam
 


You are mental, how you get that this is a "Secret US Military Autonomous Robot Project" from that picture is beyond me it really is



posted on Jun, 13 2009 @ 03:41 AM
link   
reply to post by Pockets
 


"Mental" ??? .... sad that you have to so quickly move to attack mode when you are presented with something that you personally don't agree with.



posted on Jun, 13 2009 @ 03:44 AM
link   
reply to post by zetabeam
 


not exactly an attack more light ribbing, I pity the fool who thinks that this is a robot



posted on Jun, 13 2009 @ 03:44 AM
link   
reply to post by Pockets
 


And I reached the conclusion that it most likely had to have US military involvement because of the type of device it appears to be; the apparent technology involved; the fact that the Nevada Nuclear Test Site is only 30kms away and primarily because the entire Groom mountain range has been annexed by the US military and is out of bounds to the public.



posted on Jun, 13 2009 @ 03:46 AM
link   
reply to post by zetabeam
 


Hahahah, device, take a step back and look at the thing, it is not a robot or a device



posted on Jun, 13 2009 @ 03:46 AM
link   
reply to post by Pockets
 


Ok, I'll take the "light ribbing".

In that case, could you please tell me what you see in those images ? And have you looked at the original using GE ?



posted on Jun, 13 2009 @ 03:51 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 
who knows...could be a alien


lighten up everybody, disclosure is set to happen this weekend after all, finally



posted on Jun, 13 2009 @ 03:51 AM
link   
reply to post by zetabeam
 


No I don't use google earth, I do not see any ed209 style robots in the picture, all I see is a couple dark patches and a green bit, nothing that would make me say robot, tried finding it on wikimapia but can't see anything



posted on Jun, 13 2009 @ 04:05 AM
link   
reply to post by zetabeam
 


Having another look at your coordinates I remembered a fancy new feature the new version of google earth has; Historical Imagery.

It seems your robot hasn't moved or changed for at least 2 years.

That's a bit odd don't you think?

You can see for yourself, the historical imagery is under the view tab.




posted on Jun, 13 2009 @ 04:36 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


Ok, I've just installed GE5 as I was using an earlier version that did not have the historical feature.
I've now rechecked the object and found that the original image was taken May 26, 2007. Now the interesting thing to note is that between that date and the current image, not a thing has changed as you mentioned. But what you didn't mention was that NOTHING else has changed either ... not the local vegetation; not the local background ... and even the shadows on the before and after images are IDENTICAL. This immediately tells me that the original image taken 2 years ago has NOT been updated ... so we are looking at the same image over that 2 year period.

If you think my analyses is incorrect, please feel free to find anything in the local area which has changed during that 2 year period ... even if it's only a bush or shadow.



posted on Jun, 13 2009 @ 04:39 AM
link   
reply to post by Pockets
 


So basically you're saying that you discount my images outright ... and doing so without even bothering to examine the source ?



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join