Secret US Military Autonomous Robot Project, page 1

reply to post by zetabeam

---

You aren't actually serious are you?

This:



is an autonomous armed robot??

Really?

Why is it's colouring the same as surrounding areas?

Why is it's Bilateral symmetrical head not very symmetrical with it's neck structure??

Time to step away from the computer me thinks!

reply to post by Chadwickus

---

Amazing .... you're actually saying that you can't see ANY definitive structure in the images ?
And the devices colouring is NOT identical to it's surroundings. It can be clearly seen to be an independent object and NOT an extension of it's background.

reply to post by zetabeam

---

You're really clutching at straws here.

Zoom out, I can see lots more blues, blacks and yellows that are the same shade as what you're showing all over the place, camouflage is it?

Why isn't there any roads or buildings nearby?

And I'll ask again, why is it's Bilateral symmetrical head not very symmetrical with it's neck structure?

reply to post by Chadwickus

---

Sorry to disagree but there's no "straw clutching" going on here at all.
The head has obvious symmetry as there can be seen a central tubular/cylindrical protruberance with an identical structure to either side of it giving the symmetrical shape.

I assume that you've taken a look at the original image using GE ? If so, how can you NOT see that the device is clearly independent of it's background and is most certainly NOT an image artifact or pixellation.
The object has too many well defined structural features visible to show that it is an independent object.
There is a central main body comprised of a larger, lower green platform with a smaller yellow platform above it. The head is clearly joined to the main green/yellow body platform by a thin neck. On either side of the main body are what appear to be cylindrical attachments. Mounted on the right side (looking at the image) is another structure shaped similar to a pawn from a chess set.
In total, there are too many detailed structural features visible to say that this is just a figment of my imagination or the result of an image artifact. The device is solid, real and exists.

reply to post by zetabeam

---

Cool.

So can you answer my questions?

reply to post by zetabeam

---

You've presented the facts well, now go find something with some substance and truth instead of some really shocking screen caps that could be anything, just imagine what it would be like to come to this site with something real, this is almost as bad as faces on the Moon/Mars a load of rubbish, go and find something real, not just rubbish, peace

reply to post by Chadwickus

---

The only question remaining was "why aren't there any roads or buildings?".

I completely agree with you on that point and yes, I looked around for any sign of them and found no traces whatsoever. So for the device to be where it is, it had to be either airlifted there or had to arrive at that location under it's own power. Airlifting seemed to be illogical because if it's what it seems to be - a self contained and mobile device - and undergoing tests in the rugged montains, it makes more sense to see how the device copes with that sort of terrain under it's own power. If it arrived at that location under it's own ability, does that mean it's under remote human control or is it autonomous and able to navigate on it's own ? If what I believe I'm seeing is a highly advanced military device undergoing field tests, I have no direct proof but get an impression of autonomy ... which obviously leads to the suggestion of some form of AI capability.

reply to post by Pockets

---

Ok, no probs ... your opinion is every bit as valid as mine ... so thanks for your time.

reply to post by zetabeam

---

You are mental, how you get that this is a "Secret US Military Autonomous Robot Project" from that picture is beyond me it really is

reply to post by Pockets

---

"Mental" ??? .... sad that you have to so quickly move to attack mode when you are presented with something that you personally don't agree with.

reply to post by zetabeam

---

not exactly an attack more light ribbing, I pity the fool who thinks that this is a robot

reply to post by Pockets

---

And I reached the conclusion that it most likely had to have US military involvement because of the type of device it appears to be; the apparent technology involved; the fact that the Nevada Nuclear Test Site is only 30kms away and primarily because the entire Groom mountain range has been annexed by the US military and is out of bounds to the public.

reply to post by zetabeam

---

Hahahah, device, take a step back and look at the thing, it is not a robot or a device

reply to post by Pockets

---

Ok, I'll take the "light ribbing".

In that case, could you please tell me what you see in those images ? And have you looked at the original using GE ?

reply to post by Chadwickus

---

who knows...could be a alien

lighten up everybody, disclosure is set to happen this weekend after all, finally

reply to post by zetabeam

---

No I don't use google earth, I do not see any ed209 style robots in the picture, all I see is a couple dark patches and a green bit, nothing that would make me say robot, tried finding it on wikimapia but can't see anything

reply to post by zetabeam

---

Having another look at your coordinates I remembered a fancy new feature the new version of google earth has; Historical Imagery.

It seems your robot hasn't moved or changed for at least 2 years.

That's a bit odd don't you think?

You can see for yourself, the historical imagery is under the view tab.

reply to post by Chadwickus

---

Ok, I've just installed GE5 as I was using an earlier version that did not have the historical feature.
I've now rechecked the object and found that the original image was taken May 26, 2007. Now the interesting thing to note is that between that date and the current image, not a thing has changed as you mentioned. But what you didn't mention was that NOTHING else has changed either ... not the local vegetation; not the local background ... and even the shadows on the before and after images are IDENTICAL. This immediately tells me that the original image taken 2 years ago has NOT been updated ... so we are looking at the same image over that 2 year period.

If you think my analyses is incorrect, please feel free to find anything in the local area which has changed during that 2 year period ... even if it's only a bush or shadow.

reply to post by Pockets

---

So basically you're saying that you discount my images outright ... and doing so without even bothering to examine the source ?

Judge Has [not] Ruled, Obama [not] Off Of Ballot In Georgia! (erroneous news report)
  Posted 13 days ago with 122 member flags

WWIII - USS Enterprise, a dying Legend to be the FALSE FLAG !! ??
  Posted 14 days ago with 64 member flags

A Gigantic Pyramid on Ocean Sea Floor in Bermuda Triangle?
  Posted 8 days ago with 45 member flags

"The Internal Working Components of One type of UFO".
  Posted 12 days ago with 37 member flags

A new find, is hollow Earth real?
  Posted 16 days ago with 34 member flags

A Disk in the waters around the Mysterious Johnston Atoll, in the middle of Pacific Ocean.
  Posted 18 days ago with 23 member flags

At a certain distance from Earth in space no living being can not survive ,even in a spaceship.
  Posted 9 days ago with 20 member flags

Is the wind alive, a living organism? (speculative)
  Posted 18 days ago with 19 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: