After reading a couple of comments I think it necessary to remind people of one of the little problems that officials had after 911 with the "hijackers." After the list of names was published of the perpetrators of the hijackings, a number of people on the list contracted various news agencies to report "Uh excuse me, it wasn't me ... I'm still alive." In fact I believe one the hijackers identified was in fact a pilot for the Saudi airlines and still working for them (if someone has access to this story, please fact check that for me.. the mind is rusty).

So it is entirely possible that six of the people identified as 911 hijackers could have been interviewed after 911 -- even if you accept the official story at face value. Just really sloppy investigation work by somebody. i would probably suspect that these are the people referred to in the quote.

Question for Big Unit: You seem very certain in your beliefs about the events of 911 - what evidence has led you to that conclusion?

For me - I have no idea exactly what happened that day for certain.
I've read a lot about 911 & there's some crazy extreme theories out there; but at the end of the day, I get the feeling that the official 911 government report / story is not the full truth of what happened that day.

It's just that due to all the conflicting pieces of evidence including that from some very well respected experts in their field, I feel it's enough to throw some doubt onto the official 911 story.


I guess what I'm trying to say is:
In a court of law the defendent is only found guilty if the evidence can prove beyond all reasonable doubt that they are guilty.

With the official 911 story about the Al-Qaeda hijackers etc - there's absolutely plenty of reasonable doubt.

So what exactly is it that makes you so certain the official story is 100% true?
What evidence has led you to that conclusion?

whats so hard to believe? doesnt it make sense that if its a false flag then maybe the guys are alive? how could you find proof that osama was treated in one of our hospitals in dubai and met with cia but you dont believe the hijackers were not really on the plane?

maybe im misunderstanding you but its like saying look at the massive amounts of fluoride the govt is pumping into our drinking water!! then saying oh this is utter bs because we are also entertaining the idea that they put the chlorine in there too

---

---

I could go either way on this one.

Can any of us WITHOUT A SHADOW OF A DOUBT say "the hijackers" were on any of the planes?

The same people that said they were on the planes are the ones that said the buildings fell without the aid of demo charges.

I wont go into wtc7.


Can we honestly say that the "hijackers" werent on the planes?

I think this is fairly well a bunch of pointless crap either way UNLESS it can be LEGITIMATELY tied to something else important.

Remote controlled jets?

Out on that too. Way too much other legit stuff to question without asking "did the hijackers wear clean underwear that day?".

********* STOP THIS NONSENSE **********

One more off-topic or uncivil post and a 3 day posting ban is headed your way !!!!!

The comments by Gage are perfectly aligned with evidence that has been uncovered.

Some of the names of the hijackers were names of people that are still alive and nothing to do with 911.

Perhaps those were the names the real hijackers gave when they got on the planes, maybe they stole those identities - the point is - the official story never changed, and they didn't investigate properly.