Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by grover
Why do ALL of your threads/posts have a clear politically biased slant?
I have only ever heard the typical "neocon" spokes people claiming they wanted him out of office, I really have heard nothing from Republicans
wanting him to stay?
Though I do see their point, him being ousted would make it appear Obama did something to help this ... um, like inviting him to a 4th of july
cookout.. but in reality the people of Iran are just getting tiered of the same ol' BS, much like America was with Bush. "Change" I believe is
what we called it in America. 
(PS a Neocon is considered a Liberal infiltrator of the Conservative political base with Socialist views and strong Religious views..)
I am sure there are a few hyper Religious Conservative (Not to be confused with true conservatives) that wish he would stay, and that Israel would
attack them, and that WW3 would break out and Jesus can come down and ... you know the story. 
I think my point is.....
What's your deal?
I think his deal is that in some matters it is very hard to decern the difference between conservative, neocons what ever. The conservative base at
large voted in BUSH twice, even though he possessed the alleged "LIBERAL" qualities you tout. Frankly it is hard to buy the sell you are trying to
make with your post, the patriotism, nationalism, milatarism and social agenda seemed to fine by conservatives HERE for years.
Further more it is not very conservative (RESPONSIBLITY), to lay blame of BUSH'S or the GOP'S disfunctions at the gates of liberalism. It is often
used by... CONSERVATIVES
to explain or deflect the poor performance of their largest party. Its BS and sooner you
CONSERVATIVES actually take stock and inspect the real world results of your recent
applied ideology, the better.
The religious, militaristic, nationalistic, social hierachal, war/threat of force equates safety mindset that MAKES BUSH a LIBERAL, has nothing to do
with liberal idealism.
More often than not Conservatives here try to strattle the line and blame all the woes of the country on an ideology ( damn LIBERALS) that has only
held power for less the 1/3
of the last 30 years.
ALL of you conservatives are going to be SOL until you reevaluate the things you claim to believe and the practice of such ideas. A fair share of the
recent problems AMERICA has faced were initially set into motion by these ideas.
Graham Leach Blily - great example of let the producers produce conservative cornerstone gone to pot. Which equates to letting the financial
institutions to insure their own holdings with credit that is based upon credit. At the core of the idea was to let business do business, leave um
alone and they will compete to win which will raise ALL SHIPS... Yet now it seems the only CONSERVATIVE explaination for the disaster is
BARNEY FRANKS and PELOSI - granted there is certainly blame to be laid.
I'm not speaking for Grover, but I can see where he is coming from.
