|
reply posted on 12-6-2009 @ 11:24 PM by voodmon
|
Well it's friday night anyway, so, there, i was on my deck videoing the sun just before it disappeared behind that damn tree, but nasa say's no
flares yesterday, but the sun was flickering like morse code, soo? what is that object out there, we all know planet X cometh, hercolubus the red
planet, my understanding is that it was or is inhabited by those that created us, re, re that which is written in stone all over the world, so?
metallic puzzles me, anyway food for thought , enjoy the summer, enjoy life as we know it, live every day as if it is your last..and! do not feed the
darkness, they feed on fear..cheers
[edit on 12-6-2009 by voodmon]
[edit on 12-6-2009 by voodmon]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-6-2009 @ 02:56 PM by daz__
|
yes been lookin at this for the day and still have not found a decent link to the information. I have no reason to not believe so far. At the same
time the only inforation I have read is from one ufo site and one paranormal site with the ufo site being privy to the better part of the information.
the search feature at IPAC/Caltech does not seem to be working for me so it is hard to find any records of the find there. any one else having
problems using their search program?
daz__
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-6-2009 @ 04:16 PM by Uni77
|
reply to post by my3911
wow. Have you tried zooming in?
Looks as if theres 2.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-6-2009 @ 05:31 PM by daz__
|
On close inspection I noticed that the article is from a Ronald Nussbeck.
There seems to have been something going on with him before on ATS where he was offering 10000 dollar's for anyone who could debunk his ufo
pictures..
This is probably hedding nowhere.
ATS Link
peace
daz__
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 13-6-2009 @ 06:15 PM by rehab
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-6-2009 @ 11:02 PM by RonnieUFO
|

The image taken of Planet X by 2 MASS the all sky survey in the astrophotography was taken in about 1999. If the planet is traveling at one fifth the
speed of light it would be here in 2012 sometime. The 2MASS images replaced all other astrophotos according to Caltech. The size of the planet would
be larger than Earth based on the distance the image was taken at and from the looks of the trail left behind it and the fact that it faces Earth and
the fact that there is nothing but empty space between it an our Sun makes me think its on the way here. Looking at a 2 MASS image is like looking
back in a time machine, what you see in the photo happen 10 years earlier. It was always predicted that Planet X would come from the Southern
Hemisphere. I believe it was the Naval Oberservatory who said it best, some planet of large mass moved through our solar system and tilted the large
gas giants. Even if it's not Planet X it certainly is interesting to say the least.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-6-2009 @ 11:08 PM by RonnieUFO
|
Actually, Ronald Nussbeck did offer $10,000.00 to any scientist who could debunk any of the images, see article "Debunkers fail in $10,000.00
challege". Fact: six scientists challenged for the money and all fail to prove in any way shape of form the images were not real. Here is the link
www.ufodigest.com...
He put his money where his mouth is and the debunkers crashed and burned...........
I really like a guy who can back up what he says!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2009 @ 01:40 AM by Ayrton
|
I have posted the blacked out - blurred wikisky, googlesky, WWT pictures in a couple of threads now, also someone did it one page1 here with the
youtube link from the averbury cropcircle.
Now what I find interesting is that no one here wants to discuss why 3 companies have blacked out the identical part of space in constellation
virgo.
And I`m not even saying that this thing will be here for Xmas 2012, but it sure is interesting. Even the "heat" waves visible in google/sky IRAS
allude to a dwarf star.
I enhanced the brightness of the printscreens.
[edit on 14-6-2009 by Ayrton]
[edit on 14-6-2009 by Ayrton]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2009 @ 05:10 AM by 01000001
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2009 @ 05:50 AM by wmd_2008
|
Originally posted by Ayrton
I have posted the blacked out - blurred wikisky, googlesky, WWT pictures in a couple of threads now, also someone did it one page1 here with the
youtube link from the averbury cropcircle.
Now what I find interesting is that no one here wants to discuss why 3 companies have blacked out the identical part of space in constellation
virgo.
And I`m not even saying that this thing will be here for Xmas 2012, but it sure is interesting. Even the "heat" waves visible in google/sky IRAS
allude to a dwarf star.
I enhanced the brightness of the printscreens.
[edit on 14-6-2009 by Ayrton]
[edit on 14-6-2009 by Ayrton]
ARE YOU REALLY THAT THICK!!! The three you mention get the pictures used in their program from the one source some of these images are over 10yrs
old. When you log on to google sky,wwt etc YOU are NOT controlling a telescope its just a large database of images used to crete what the night sky
looks like its NOT REAL TIME images ie if you point to say the Orion Nebula its not pointing a scope it uses the pictures in the database.
When these programs say real time they mean if you go out and look at that position in the sky the stars etc they show you will be at that
position.
PlanetX , Nibiru are whatever you want to call it is BS.
Re the $10,000 challenege the IDIOT set I would like to know what rules it was under , was it independant.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 14-6-2009 @ 06:00 AM by Ayrton
|
1. There is no need for insults.
2. I`m perfectly aware of the fact that it`s not real-time.
3. With just calling the images BS you don`t really present any arguments WHY it is BS.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2009 @ 07:01 AM by wmd_2008
|
reply to post by Ayrton
Have a look at various sites re Nibiru, Panetx , 2012 etc even the ones on here,first every one seems to have a different theory its in the
Northern sky ,Southern sky, its a brown dwarf star, its acomet planet its a spaceship sized planet etc etc.
If its supposed to be here REAL AMATUER ASTRONOMERS would have pictures of it by now.
Second if we have PROOF I will wait till 21/12/ 2012 I will send you a quick U2U apology before we all die  
If we are still here 22/12/2012 day after its suppsosed to be here I will send you a quick u2u PMSL at the BS YOU BELIEVE IN! how's that!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2009 @ 09:38 AM by paradiselost333
|
reply to post by rehab
"close"...not close at all  no realy i could look up the distance but why? it is just how far light travels in 4.2 years
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2009 @ 10:34 AM by ablue07
|
reply to post by paradiselost333
This is wild. The scientist says it's an artificial object! "sort of like stainless steel" The gold object following this "thing" look like a sun
cruiser I've seen on the SOHO website. Not to get off topic: there are allot of anomalies around the sun. At any rate thanks for the post I'm pretty
much in awe about this thing. Golly "like stainless steel" amazing!!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2009 @ 10:55 AM by ablue07
|
reply to post by wmd_2008
You write as if you know for sure that all of the many takes on this Planet X thing are B.S. I don't know how you know that. You may want to take a
class in being civil while communicating. I find know it all's with attitudes very distasteful.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2009 @ 11:35 PM by Watchdog-Finland
|
lol!!!!!!!! ok guys and gals time to brake the ice WEEEEEA RE ALL GOING TO DIE, some time in the future, but as i know it that is not Nibiru, and
allso what i know every knew planet is first named Planet x    and for the rest of you so calld experts that say nibiru is real, lol by
now it would have to be like a second sun and light up the sky, does pics with nibiru in it are so far fakes, or lense flares, there is no Nibiru
comming , lol u can wait many major lawsuits after 2012, to dos what has traumatized and destroyed ppls lifes, so stop the chit about nibiru its not
real
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 15-6-2009 @ 01:40 PM by coney
|
I've been hearing lately that Nibiru is on the other side of the sun, which is why we can't see it right now.
The planet has a 3600 year orbit, right? It was here 1600 years BC, so it's about due.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-6-2009 @ 01:44 PM by Watchdog-Finland
|
reply to post by coney
then the suns gravity would
1.pull it towrds the sun
2. pull it away and shoot if out of its orbit ^^ simple astro physic math
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-6-2009 @ 07:43 PM by paradiselost333
|
reply to post by wmd_2008
Originally posted by wmd_2008
ARE YOU REALLY THAT THICK!!! The three you mention get the pictures used in their program from the one source some of these images are over 10yrs
old. When you log on to google sky,wwt etc YOU are NOT controlling a telescope its just a large database of images used to crete what the night
I dont think he was saying that! they Are real images are they not!! nobody was saying it was real time are You That tHick  just blind
disbelief....see you in 2013
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 05:51 AM by DocEmrick
|
reply to post by my3911
That video is very interesting. I never really believed in Nibiru, or any of Stitchin's stuff, but I do find it odd that 3 star mapping programs
block out the same area of space from view.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |