reply to post by Sam60
After looking at the evidence I put forward, and researching it further, you still feel that the conclusions I put forward are incorrect, then there
is nothing I can do about that. I honestly say, good luck with your investigations.
Skepticism is a necessary thing to finding fact, and we should all question the evidence before us to reach our own conclusions. Skepticism is
necessary for science, so I have immense respect for it.
However, appealing to the ad hominem attack by effectively calling me a liar, and addressing nothing of the explanation I give, is...sloppy, and
ineffective. If your goal is to prove to others the existence of extra-terrestrials, or even just expose some form of conspiracy to hide the truth,
then rational questioning of proposed evidence is the only real route. Otherwise, you convince only those who wish only to prove conclusions already
made. If that is your goal, mission accomplished.
But if you want honest questioning and debate of my argument, I welcome all comments. If I still can't convince you, then that's my fault for not
defending my stance well enough.
I would like to note that I expressed no opinion towards contact from extra-terrestrials nor conspiracy theory to cover-up any of such, and attacked
no one's character in my explanation for the 6/11/09 light over NM and AZ. I would appreciate the same respect afforded to me.
From now on, I will not comment further on any further questioning of my character in this fashion, but still welcome open discussion of my
explanation.