It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

U.S. scientists unveil NASA’s secrets about cities on the Moon and microbes on Mars

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 04:29 PM
link   


The former manager of the Data and Photo Control Department at NASA’s Lunar Receiving Laboratory during the manned Apollo Lunar Program, Ken Johnston, has released quite a number of sensational statements recently in the USA. The specialist said that U.S. astronauts found ancient ruins of artificial origin and a previously unknown technology to control gravitation when then landed on the Moon. Astronauts took pictures of the objects that they found, but NASA ordered Johnston to destroy the images. Johnston did not follow the order. He said that the U.S. government had been keeping this information a secret for 40 years.

Source
english.pravda.ru...

It's old but very interesting that this testimony came from an actual NASA employee.




posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 04:56 PM
link   
sounds cool. I'd love to see those pictures though, you know, for proof.



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 04:59 PM
link   
reply to post by Chovy
 


lol yeah I know, there's a huge lack of proof with conspiracy theories it's a shame.



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 05:03 PM
link   
I am very surprised i haven't heard of this before good article and something else to add to all the info and pics that are so questionable especially if he worked for NASA as manager of the Data and Photo Control Department he would be the one to know these things and be able to tell us if they were doctored as speculated in the many blurred out photos. S&F for you my friend



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 05:05 PM
link   
There's a good (and 58 pages long) thread about this:
NASA Scientist Fired - Promises Disclosure by Zorgon
Thanks for sharing



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 05:05 PM
link   
The only thing is.. pravada.ru is probably the worst "News" site for making up or exaggerating news.

Its hard to take anything seriously when it comes from that website unfortunately.



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 05:12 PM
link   
Sorry guys didn't even realise provada was some disinfo site, it's the first time I came across it and saw some cool stories and thought I'd share.



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 05:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Scope and a Beam
It's old but very interesting that this testimony came from an actual NASA employee.


On what basis do you believe Johnston was the NASA guy in charge of the photo archives? On his say-so alone?

My investigation indicates an entirely different status, but let's start modestly.



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 05:35 PM
link   
reply to post by JimOberg
 


On the basis that I wasn't aware that pravada is a load of BS, it's the first time I'd been on it forgive my ignorance.

[edit on 11-6-2009 by Scope and a Beam]



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 05:53 PM
link   
reply to post by Scope and a Beam
 


I wouldn’t really call Pravda disinfo. I would call it sensationalist tabloid style fiction.

"Pravda" translates from Russian to English as "The Truth". The strangest thing about Pravda, or perhaps the most ironic is that in it's history as Soviet Propaganda and now a corporate internet tabloid (now published in Serbia) it has rarely if ever lived up to it's name.



posted on Jun, 12 2009 @ 05:56 AM
link   
reply to post by Scope and a Beam
 

I dont think that NASA guy was as senior as that.
I think he held quite a junior position.
His mate Hoagland's also full of it.


[edit on 12-6-2009 by Sam60]



posted on Jun, 12 2009 @ 07:03 AM
link   
SNWS warning on that link for those at work, there's a boob on the left side of the page



posted on Jun, 12 2009 @ 08:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by Sam60
reply to post by Scope and a Beam
 

I dont think that NASA guy was as senior as that.
I think he held quite a junior position.
His mate Hoagland's also full of it.


[edit on 12-6-2009 by Sam60]


Yeah, wasn't he, like, 27 years old, with no college degrees, then? Good candidate for chief scientist of the photo archives, for sure.



new topics

top topics



 
4

log in

join