Originally posted by Big Unit
Dod Bonez just say there were squibs? Squibs?
Nope, sure didn't. You will not find that word anywhere in my post. What you are doing by twisting or putting words in my mouth is being
dishonest.
Originally posted by Big Unit
Operations Northwoods was a scheme that involved the death of zero Americans.
No where in my post did I say Americans were going to die from Operation Northwoods. You are, once again, twisting or putting words in my mouth.
Dishonest.
Originally posted by Big Unit
Compressed air. Just like every expert in the world says.
Oh really? Every expert in the world? Please show a list of names of every expert in the world that has publicly stated the plumes are compressed air.
Please make sure the list is considerably larger than the lists of architects, engineers, scientists and physicists at 9/11 research organizations.
Please also show any other building collapse (besides controlled demolition) that exhibits these plumes.
Originally posted by Big Unit
This is a perfect example of how charlatans like Bone-Z try to mislead others. He takes a picture of the WTC and shows only the very top portion of
it, then puts another picture of something that looks about 7 stories tall.
Debunkers occasionally state that since the top of the south tower tipped over, then it can't be a controlled demolition and that it tipped due to
weakening by fire. The purpose of the comparison is to show that the way the south tower started to collapse (top tipping over) is not unprecedented
in controlled demolitions.
Surely, Big Unit (Troy), someone as smart and "not fooled" as you knows Newton's Laws of Motion? Sticking with the first law, which is also
referred to as the law of inertia:
1. A body at rest stays at rest, and a body in motion stays in motion, unless it is acted on by an external force.
In other words, a body (the top of the south tower) would stay in motion (continuing to tip over and fall to the ground) unless acted upon by an
external unbalanced force (explosives being detonated (the plumes) in the lower part of the tower allowing the tipping top block of building to stop
tipping and fall straight down to
appear as if it's crushing the structure below).
Originally posted by Big Unit
that in itself wouldnt be considered a top down demoliotion
Top-down demolitions are not unprecedented. In fact, take a look at the image in the upper left corner of my collage:
Those two apartment towers in the upper left are top-down demolition as evidenced by the plumes being detonated up top first and then middle and
bottom ones after. No two demolitions are the same. Everything in a controlled demoliton relies on timing and delays of the explosives.
Originally posted by Big Unit
You do realize the DNA of nearly every passenger on the plane that hit the Pentagon was recovered?
You do realize that you're blindly taking the government at it's word without so much as one question asked?
Originally posted by Big Unit
You know he only shows a still photo of that other building?? I can tell you why. Because he would never link you the youtube of the building being
demolished.
Perhaps because there may not be a video? I've had that image for many years and don't know if there is a video to go with it.
Originally posted by Big Unit
Becuase you hear the loud bang bang bang bang bang as the detonations are going off.
There are several witnesses that heard the "boom boom boom" detonations going off as both towers collapsed. For instance, south tower survivor Brian
Clark or by-stander David Long. Then there's all of the firefighter and first responder testimony.
Originally posted by Big Unit
You'll see the flashed of light going off. flash flash flash
Many people, including lots of firefighters saw the flashes of the detonations going off. I posted the oral histories and a video of some of the oral
histories being read. Your fault for not taking the time to read.
Originally posted by Big Unit
This is another tool of manipulation that Bone-Z uses.
No manipulation. Just
your lack of research and knowledge of what happened on 9/11.
Originally posted by Big Unit
I try to wake up members of the truth movement. I rarely succeed.
That's because all available evidence goes against everything you have to say. Not to mention you don't even know the half of what you're talking
about and are wrong on just about everything you say.
Originally posted by Big Unit
Usually I'm called a disinfo agent. Or I'm asked who is paying me
Well, for instance when you make the false claims that nobody heard the "boom boom boom" from the detonations going off in the towers or saw the
flashes, that is completely false either by purposeful deception or lack of research. Or when you make the claim of no wargames/exercises on 9/11 and
I and others have proven you to be wrong. What do you expect to be called?
Originally posted by Big Unit
With a little research you can have figured this out yourself. My suggestion to you. Quit wasting your time reading conspiracy sites, they are conning
you with lies and misinformation.
Says the person who doesn't know enough about 9/11 to know the names of people who heard the detonations going off, or the firefighter accounts of
the flashes and other explosions going off. Or your dishonest claim below about no wargames or exercises. You've got much to learn.
Originally posted by Big Unit
Here's a link to another phone call to one of Gage's architects. It's 10 minutes of pure stupidity
The only part of that video that relates to the word "stupidity" is the interviewer that telephoned architect Barry Koren. You are the maker of the
video and your name is likely Troy.
I've downloaded the video as evidence and contacted Richard Gage. Gage will be contacting Koren to make him aware of the video. You could be facing
charges of impersonation, fraud, defamation and slander.
How dare you call an architect and claim yourself to be from AE911T and persist to interrogate him. And you have the audacity to say that truthers
manipulate and lie? The credibility you think you might have had here is now gone.
Originally posted by Big Unit
Are you aware that the experts at the scene of WTC7 knew it was coming down.
The only reason one might think that it was coming down would be because the towers came down. That is the only reason. However, for WTC7 to fall the
way it did (straight down), every single support column had to have been severed at exactly the same time:
WTC7 fell straighter and more perfect than the building it's being compared to. Fires don't do that otherwise demo companies would be using fire
instead of wasting money on explosives and manpower.
Originally posted by Big Unit
3. Exercises never took place that day. No training took place that day.
You are the epitome of the definition of the word "wrong" and/or "unresearched".
In the following video at 6:10, Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney asks Secretary Donald Rumsfeld about the wargames and General Richard Myers responds
and talks about the wargames and training exercises:
www.youtube.com...
As I've already stated, you have alot to learn and research. You should go take some time away now from these forums and research, research research!
