AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the 9/11 Conspiracies discussion forum.  (rss)


911 Truth - Somebody Please Give It To Me!


<<  13    14    15    16  >>



reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 03:26 PM by weedwhacker


reply to post by titorite



Hey weedwhacker as a commercial could you tell me and all of us here if commercial planes are painted with radar reflective paint...


No...they are not. Just look at the AAL paint scheme! There's hardly any!

That paint scheme concept grew out of the fact that the paint contributes a lot of weight. Less paint, and depending on the airplane, you can save thousands of pounds. Plus, it is their iconic 'logo'.

The weight savings (and consequential fuel savings) are offset, though, by the man-hours needed to polish the aluminum skin, to keep it looking pretty. You will note, on the more modern jets, pieces that are composites (carbon fibre, epoxy honeycomb, etc.) are painted...because in their natural state they are usually black, or dark grey.

The metal structure of the airplane is what reflects RADAR to return a 'primary' target.

EDIT tags...

[edit on 6/19/0909 by weedwhacker]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-6-2009 @ 07:20 AM by Ponyo


Somehow the 9/11 triggers terror action by other so-called-muslims in my country, before that there was none as far as i remember. Im a Muslim, 9/11 really doesnt effect our life so much (except that suddenly theyre Balinese and christian groups who hate us) here but many of my families abroad were sent back to my country because suddenly they were seen as the real terrorists (eventhough theyre just Normal muslims like me and have nothing to do with 9/11) :-/



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-7-2009 @ 10:47 PM by dazbog


Originally posted by grapesofraft
reply to post by Solar.Absolution



Who in there right mind in the 1970's would hae built a tower too withstand more than one jet impact at a time. What would be the freakin' odds of that happening?

[edit on 18-6-2009 by grapesofraft]


grapesofraft

I find your feigned innocence quite offensive. As others have stated, there are dozens of threads
here that might be helpful to you.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-7-2009 @ 12:30 AM by psikeyhackr


Originally posted by grapesofraft
Who in there right mind in the 1970's would hae built a tower too withstand more than one jet impact at a time. What would be the freakin' odds of that happening?

[edit on 18-6-2009 by grapesofraft]


Is it possible to buld a skyscraper that size which could not withstand multiple airliner impacts? It was only supposed to sway 3 feet in a 150 mph wind. The design problem is making skyscrapers handle the wind from any direction. A plane only applies force in a small area whereas the wind spreads the force out.

Your question presumes an airliner could destroy it but after SEVEN YEARS we don't even have a table specifying the steel and concrete on every level. The south tower was only deflected 14 inches by the impact and then oscillated for four minutes. This BELIEF that the plane could bring the building down is a lot of emotional nonsense.

psik



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


<<  13    14    15    16  >>












































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.035 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.