Originally posted by raptorinvictus
reply to post by ghaleon12
I dont think the liberary analogy is correct. The whole point is that complex systems have a way of going on an unpredictable path and the internet
is about as complex as systems get.
What we need to find out is what 'makes' life and how does that apply to a complex system?
The point is right now the internet only stores information but does it have the potential to understand it?
The difference between knowledge and wisdom!
The internet isn't complex, its just a really really large scale LAN. Even the most basic cell is more complex than the internet and everything
else. Even if the scope of the internet is increasing, I don't see how that could translate into a living thinking being. It really doesn't work
like that. Its like saying, "Well this small pile of rocks isn't that special, but if we through more of the same on it, it'll turn into something
it isn't! We need to make this small pile of rocks huge, and then it'll come to life!"
It like thinking that telephone lines could eventually understand human language since we talk through them all the time, doesn't make sense.
"Viruses fulfill replication, mutation and selection — but people don’t consider them to be alive, because they think life has to be made of
chemicals. We can definitely make things in a computer that fulfill the criteria for life that NASA uses, except it’s not chemical."
I hate to tell the Harvard guy this, but biological viruses aren't living.
[edit on 12-6-2009 by ghaleon12]