I think you're missing my point, what I am saying is there is nothing new about designing a 10t concrete penetrating earthquake bomb. Barnes Wallis did it in WWII, here is 2009 the new US bomb is announced as if it was a first, yes the new bomb is more powerful, penetrates deeper (sounds like the wife's ideal man) but it's nothing new.

The Grand Slam bomb would penetrate concrete, 4.5m of heavily reinforced concrete, even deeper on ordinary ground, and it's earthquake effect was what caused the damage, please check out my original references or other material on these bombs.

A bomb of this size capable of penetrating through that much concrete adding a warhead just adds icing to the cake. That kind of weight penetrating that deep indicates an enormous amount of kinetic energy, enough to a lot of damage without even exploding. The fact that it then explodes after the penetration is probably going to be downright devastating in a tunnel or bunker where the explosive force has less place's to go.

Now if only they'd get going on the rods from god concept, now that would be one hell of a bunker buster.

oh super, more weapons....

Im sure im not the only one here who thinks that weapons of this scale should never be made, im not taking about householders having firearms for protection. This thing's goal is to do major annihilation.

no weapons would mean peace. #, rich politicians and criminals sure dont want that, divide and conquer.

don't worry, every civ has a rise and fall, we are going to hell faster every day, probably exponentially...peace will come after though.


excuse typos, insert copius amounts of sarcasm where you would deem fit.